10-Q 1 d75473_mer10q.htm BODY OF FORM 10-Q                          MERCHANTS BANCSHARES, INC

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q



[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended

September 30, 2010


or


[    ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from

 

to

 

 

Commission file number:

0-11595

 

Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

 

03-0287342

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

275 Kennedy Drive, South Burlington, Vermont

 

05403

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

802-658-3400

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ X ] Yes    [    ] No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[    ] Yes    [    ] No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer [    ]

Accelerated Filer [ X ]

Nonaccelerated  Filer [    ]

Smaller Reporting Company [    ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[    ] Yes                    [ X ] No


As of November 1, 2010, there were 6,179,019 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.





MERCHANTS BANCSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION


 

Item 1.

 

Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes to Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

 

5 - 14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations

 

14 - 27

 

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

28 - 30

 

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

31

 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

31

 

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

31

 

Item 3.

 

Defaults upon Senior Securities

 

31

 

Item 4.

 

(Removed and Reserved)

 

31

 

Item 5.

 

Other Information

 

31

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

31 - 32

 

Signatures

 

33

 

Exhibits

 

 








MERCHANTS BANCSHARES, INC.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(In thousands except share and per share data)

 

 

September 30
2010

 

December 31,
2009

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

    Cash and due from banks

 

 

$

30,764 

 

$

26,832 

    Interest earning deposits with banks and other short-term investments

 

 

 

7,239 

 

 

47,714 

        Total cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

38,003 

 

 

74,546 

    Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Securities available for sale, at fair value

 

 

 

502,467 

 

 

407,652 

        Securities held to maturity (fair value of $950 and $1,248)

 

 

 

865 

 

 

1,159 

            Total investments

 

 

 

503,332 

 

 

408,811 

    Loans

 

 

 

906,906 

 

 

918,538 

    Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

 

 

10,090 

 

 

10,976 

            Net loans

 

 

 

896,816 

 

 

907,562 

    Federal Home Loan Bank stock

 

 

 

8,630 

 

 

8,630 

    Bank premises and equipment, net

 

 

 

13,757 

 

 

13,090 

    Investment in real estate limited partnerships

 

 

 

5,201 

 

 

5,220 

    Other assets

 

 

 

16,556 

 

 

17,389 

            Total assets

 

 

$

1,482,295 

 

$

1,435,248 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Demand deposits

 

 

$

136,636 

 

$

119,742 

        Savings, NOW and money market accounts

 

 

 

565,927 

 

 

529,034 

        Time deposits $100 thousand and greater

 

 

 

121,702 

 

 

134,147 

        Other time deposits

 

 

 

248,384 

 

 

260,396 

            Total deposits

 

 

 

1,072,649 

 

 

1,043,319 

    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term debt

 

 

 

175,133 

 

 

179,718 

    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, long-term

 

 

 

54,000 

 

 

54,000 

    Other long-term debt

 

 

 

31,158 

 

 

31,215 

    Junior subordinated debentures issued to unconsolidated subsidiary trust

 

 

 

20,619 

 

 

20,619 

    Other liabilities

 

 

 

29,236 

 

 

15,365 

            Total liabilities

 

 

 

1,382,795 

 

 

1,344,236 

    Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Preferred stock Class A non-voting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Shares authorized - 200,000, none outstanding

 

 

 

-- 

 

 

-- 

    Preferred stock Class B voting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Shares authorized - 1,500,000, none outstanding

 

 

 

-- 

 

 

-- 

    Common stock, $.01 par value

 

 

 

67 

 

 

67 

        Shares authorized

10,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Issued

As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

6,651,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Outstanding

As of September 30, 2010

5,852,748

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

5,815,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Capital in excess of par value

 

 

 

36,303 

 

 

36,278 

    Retained earnings

 

 

 

71,299 

 

 

63,552 

    Treasury stock, at cost

 

 

 

(16,989)

 

 

(17,798)

 

As of September 30, 2010

799,012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

836,390

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Deferred compensation arrangements

 

 

 

6,212 

 

 

6,246 

    Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

 

2,608 

 

 

2,667 

            Total shareholders' equity

 

 

 

99,500 

 

 

91,012 

            Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 

 

$

1,482,295 

 

$

1,435,248 


See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements




1




Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)


 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(In thousands except per share data)

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Interest and fees on loans

$ 11,584 

 

$ 12,079 

 

$ 34,675 

 

$ 35,791 

    Investment income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Interest on debt securities

3,562 

 

4,458 

 

11,115 

 

14,480 

        Interest on interest earning deposits with banks and other
         short-term investments

23 

 

42 

 

68 

 

56 

            Total interest and dividend income

15,169 

 

16,579 

 

45,858 

 

50,327 

INTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Savings, NOW and money market accounts

358 

 

429 

 

1,116 

 

1,492 

    Time deposits $100 thousand and greater

312 

 

541 

 

1,003 

 

1,888 

    Other time deposits

682 

 

1,265 

 

2,219 

 

4,371 

    Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, short-term and
     other short-term borrowings

374 

 

201 

 

1,164 

 

 333 

    Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, long-term

500 

 

500 

 

1,484 

 

1,470 

    Other long-term debt

216 

 

649 

 

645 

 

2,468 

    Junior subordinated debentures issued to unconsolidated subsidiary trust

297 

 

298 

 

891 

 

893 

            Total interest expense

2,739 

 

3,883 

 

8,522 

 

12,915 

    Net interest income

12,430 

 

12,696 

 

37,336 

 

37,412 

    (Credit) provision for credit losses

(400)

 

600 

 

200 

 

3,500 

    Net interest income after (credit) provision for credit losses

12,830 

 

12,096 

 

37,136 

 

33,912 

NONINTEREST INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Changes in fair value on impaired securities

247 

 

-- 

 

458 

 

-- 

    Non-credit related (gain) losses on securities not expected to be sold
     (recognized in other comprehensive income)

(336)

 

-- 

 

(627)

 

-- 

    Net impairment losses

(89)

 

-- 

 

(169)

 

-- 

    Gain (loss) on investment securities, net

685 

 

261 

 

1,897 

 

56 

    Trust company income

539 

 

441 

 

1,590 

 

1,255 

    Service charges on deposits

1,219 

 

1,490 

 

3,853 

 

4,217 

    Equity in losses of real estate limited partnerships

(408)

 

(542)

 

(1,263)

 

(1,466)

    Other noninterest income

1,079 

 

952 

 

3,182 

 

2,875 

            Total noninterest income

3,025 

 

2,602 

 

9,090 

 

6,937 

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Salaries and wages

4,097 

 

3,675 

 

11,704 

 

10,300 

    Employee benefits

1,047 

 

1,091 

 

3,420 

 

3,685 

    Occupancy expense

920 

 

894 

 

2,761 

 

2,680 

    Equipment expense

741 

 

693 

 

2,131 

 

2,109 

    Legal and professional fees

596 

 

553 

 

1,851 

 

1,899 

    Marketing

332 

 

363 

 

1,013 

 

1,142 

    State franchise taxes

298 

 

266 

 

872 

 

866 

    FDIC Insurance

345 

 

393 

 

1,065 

 

1,649 

    Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO") expenses

91 

 

87 

 

(299)

 

305 

    Other noninterest expense

1,536 

 

1,788 

 

4,572 

 

5,045 

            Total noninterest expense

10,003 

 

9,803 

 

29,090 

 

29,680 

Income before provision for income taxes

5,852 

 

4,895 

 

17,136 

 

11,169 

Provision for income taxes

1,350 

 

1,181 

 

4,219 

 

2,486 

NET INCOME

$   4,502 

 

$   3,714 

 

$  12,917 

 

$   8,683 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

$     0.73 

 

$     0.61 

 

$     2.10 

 

$     1.42 

Diluted earnings per common share

$     0.73 

 

$     0.61 

 

$     2.10 

 

$     1.42 


See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements




2




Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)


 

Three Months Ended
September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

(In thousands)

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

Net income

$ 4,502 

 

$ 3,714 

 

$ 12,917 

 

$   8,683 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Change in net unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale, net
     of taxes of $(463), $1,825, $956, and $3,092

(860)

 

3,389 

 

1,775 

 

5,743 

    Reclassification adjustments for securities gains included in net
     income, net of taxes of $(240), $(91), $(664) and $(19)

(445)

 

(170)

 

(1,233)

 

(37)

    Change in net unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of taxes
     of $(125), $(162), $(387) and $(43)

(232)

 

(301)

 

(719)

 

(79)

    Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes of $21, $25, $63 and $74

39 

 

46 

 

118 

 

138 

Other comprehensive income

(1,498)

 

2,964 

 

(59)

 

5,765 

Comprehensive income

$ 3,004 

 

$ 6,678 

 

$ 12,858 

 

$ 14,448 


See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements




3




Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30,

 

2010

 

2009

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$   12,917 

 

$    8,683 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

    Provision for loan losses

 

200 

 

3,500 

    Depreciation and amortization

 

3,978 

 

1,124 

    Stock option expense

 

68 

 

45 

    Net gains on sales of investment securities

 

(1,897)

 

(56)

    Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities

 

169 

 

-- 

    Net gains on sales of loans

 

(12)

 

-- 

    Net losses (gains) on sale of premises and equipment

 

23 

 

(199)

    Gains and expense recoveries on sale of other real estate owned

 

(537)

 

-- 

    Equity in losses of real estate limited partnerships, net

 

1,263 

 

1,466 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

    (Increase) decrease in interest receivable

 

(440)

 

166 

    Decrease in other assets

 

669 

 

433 

    Decrease in interest payable

 

(105)

 

(369)

    Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

 

13,565 

 

(3,655)

    Decrease in deferred gain on real estate sale

 

(317)

 

(317)

        Net cash provided by operating activities

 

29,544 

 

10,821 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

    Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale

 

44,952 

 

36,222 

    Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale

 

160,731 

 

81,633 

    Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity

 

294 

 

431 

    Purchases of investment securities available for sale

 

(300,652)

 

(27,740)

    Loan originations less than (in excess of) principal payments

 

9,442 

 

(82,993)

    Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock, net

 

-- 

 

(107)

    Proceeds from sales of loans, net

 

290 

 

-- 

    Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment

 

 

252 

    Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned

 

1,801 

 

    Real estate limited partnership investments

 

(1,244)

 

(974)

    Purchases of bank premises and equipment

 

(1,955)

 

(1,246)

        Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(86,337)

 

5,478 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

    Net increase in deposits

 

29,330 

 

100,005 

    Net decrease in short-term borrowings

 

(364)

 

(30,882)

    Proceeds from long-term debt

 

-- 

 

1,225 

    Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase-short term

 

(4,221)

 

28,895 

    Principal payments on long-term debt

 

(57)

 

(51,170)

    Cash dividends paid

 

(4,593)

 

(4,532)

    Sale of treasury stock

 

-- 

 

    Increase in deferred compensation arrangements

 

155 

 

135 

    Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of withholding taxes

 

-- 

 

532 

    Tax benefit from exercise of stock options

 

-- 

 

51 

        Net cash provided by financing activities

 

20,250 

 

44,262 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(36,543)

 

60,561 

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period

 

74,546 

 

36,256 

Cash and cash equivalents end of period

 

$   38,003 

 

$  96,817 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

    Total interest payments

 

$     8,628 

 

$  13,284 

    Total income tax payments

 

6,600 

 

2,495 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

    Distribution of stock under deferred compensation arrangements

 

455 

 

400 

    Distribution of treasury stock in lieu of cash dividend

 

577 

 

579 

    Transfer of loans to other real estate owned

 

629 

 

-- 

    Increase in payable for investments purchased

 

14,655 

 

5,466 


See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements




4




Notes To Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements


For additional information, see the Merchants Bancshares, Inc. (“Merchants”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 16, 2010.


Note 1: Financial Statement Presentation


Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. All adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim consolidated financial statements of Merchants as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been included. The information was prepared from the unaudited financial statements of Merchants and its subsidiaries, Merchants Bank and MBVT Statutory Trust I. Amounts reported for prior periods are reclassified, where necessary, to be consistent with the current period presentation.


Management’s Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates include those used in determining the allowance for loan losses, income taxes, interest income recognition on loans and investments and analysis of other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities. Operating results in the future may vary from the amounts derived from Management's estimates and assumptions.


Note 2: Investment Securities


Investments in securities are classified as available for sale or held to maturity as of September 30, 2010. The amortized cost and fair values of the securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:




5





(In thousands)

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 

Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 

Fair
Value

As of September 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for Sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$

250

 

$

1

 

$

--

 

$

251

U.S. Agency Obligations

 

71,581

 

 

623

 

 

--

 

 

72,204

Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") Obligations

 

6,567

 

 

341

 

 

--

 

 

6,908

Residential Real Estate Mortgage-backed Securities ("Agency
 MBSs")

 

150,238

 

 

7,003

 

 

73

 

 

 157,168

Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("Agency CMOs")

 

254,405

 

 

2,666

 

 

700

 

 

 256,371

Non-agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("Non-
 agency CMOs")

 

7,365

 

 

4

 

 

300

 

 

7,069

Asset Backed Securities ("ABSs")

 

2,656

 

 

14

 

 

174

 

 

2,496

 

$

493,062

 

$

10,652

 

$

1,247

 

$

502,467

Held to Maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agency MBSs

 

865

 

 

85

 

 

--

 

 

950

 

$

865

 

$

85

 

$

--

 

$

950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for Sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$

249

 

$

1

 

$

--

 

$

250

U.S. Agency Obligations

 

40,512

 

 

38

 

 

172

 

 

40,378

FHLB Obligations

 

13,017

 

 

270

 

 

38

 

 

13,249

Agency MBSs

 

182,569

 

 

8,437

 

 

11

 

 

190,995

Agency CMOs

 

151,241

 

 

2,374

 

 

574

 

 

153,041

Non-agency CMOs

 

8,086

 

 

2

 

 

1,226

 

 

6,862

ABSs

 

3,406

 

 

--

 

 

529

 

 

2,877

 

$

399,080

 

$

11,122

 

$

2,550

 

$

407,652

Held to Maturity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agency MBSs

 

1,159

 

 

89

 

 

--

 

 

1,248

 

$

1,159

 

$

89

 

$

--

 

$

1,248


Included in gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2010 are $174 thousand of non-credit related unrealized losses on other-than-temporarily impaired securities in the ABS portfolio, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.





6




The contractual final maturity distribution of the debt securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity as of September 30, 2010, are as follows:


(In thousands)

Within
One Year

 

After One
But Within
Five Years

 

After Five
But Within
Ten Years

 

After Ten
Years

 

Total

As of September 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for Sale (at fair value):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$

251

 

$

--

 

$

--

 

$

--

 

$

251

U.S. Agency Obligations

 

--

 

 

13,379

 

 

48,302

 

 

10,523

 

 

72,204

FHLB Obligations

 

--

 

 

4,811

 

 

2,097

 

 

--

 

 

6,908

Agency MBSs

 

3,114

 

 

8,476

 

 

24,085

 

 

121,493

 

 

157,168

Agency CMOs

 

1,043

 

 

--

 

 

15,525

 

 

239,803

 

 

256,371

Non-agency CMOs

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

1,231

 

 

5,838

 

 

7,069

ABSs

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

2,496

 

 

2,496

 

$

4,408

 

$

26,666

 

$

91,240

 

$

380,153

 

$

502,467

Held to Maturity (at amortized cost):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agency MBSs

 

13

 

 

217

 

 

94

 

 

541

 

 

865

 

$

13

 

$

217

 

$

94

 

$

541

 

$

865

As of December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for Sale (at fair value):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$

--

 

$

250

 

$

--

 

$

--

 

$

250

U.S. Agency Obligations

 

--

 

 

25,519

 

 

14,859

 

 

--

 

 

40,378

FHLB Obligations

 

--

 

 

13,249

 

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

13,249

Agency MBSs

 

2,079

 

 

16,681

 

 

53,790

 

 

118,445

 

 

190,995

Agency CMOs

 

--

 

 

3,288

 

 

16,281

 

 

133,472

 

 

153,041

Non-agency CMOs

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

1,458

 

 

5,404

 

 

6,862

ABSs

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

2,877

 

 

2,877

 

$

2,079

 

$

58,987

 

$

86,388

 

$

260,198

 

$

407,652

Held to Maturity (at amortized cost):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agency MBSs

 

23

 

 

390

 

 

121

 

 

625

 

 

1,159

 

$

23

 

$

390

 

$

121

 

$

625

 

$

1,159


Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have rights to call or prepay obligations. Maturities of MBSs and CMOs are based on final contractual maturities.


Proceeds from sales of available for sale debt securities were $14.91 million for the third quarter of 2010 and $44.95 million for the first nine months of 2010. Gross gains of $696 thousand and $1.91 million were realized from these sales for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively. Gross losses of $11 thousand were realized from these sales for each of the third quarter and first nine months of 2010.





7




Gross unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were as follows:


 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or more

 

Total

(In thousands)

Fair Value

 

Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Loss

 

Fair Value

 

Loss

As of September 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$           --

 

$     --

 

$       --

 

$       --

 

$           --

 

$       --

U.S. Agency Obligations

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

FHLB Obligations

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

 

--

Agency MBSs

26,900

 

73

 

--

 

--

 

26,900

 

73

Agency CMOs

99,984

 

700

 

--

 

--

 

99,984

 

700

Non-agency CMOs

--

 

--

 

5,738

 

300

 

5,738

 

300

ABSs

1,041

 

174

 

--

 

--

 

1,041

 

174

 

$ 127,925

 

$ 947

 

$ 5,738

 

$    300

 

$ 133,663

 

$ 1,247

As of December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Obligations

$           --

 

$     --

 

$       --

 

$       --

 

$           --

 

$       --

U.S. Agency Obligations

25,330

 

172

 

--

 

--

 

25,330

 

172

FHLB Obligations

2,962

 

38

 

--

 

--

 

2,962

 

38

Agency MBSs

4,646

 

11

 

--

 

--

 

4,646

 

11

Agency CMOs

77,678

 

574

 

--

 

--

 

77,678

 

574

Non-agency CMOs

--

 

--

 

6,706

 

1,226

 

6,706

 

1,226

ABSs

--

 

--

 

2,877

 

529

 

2,877

 

529

 

$ 110,616

 

$ 795

 

$ 9,583

 

$ 1,755

 

$ 120,199

 

$ 2,550


There were no securities held to maturity with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.


Unrealized losses on investment securities result from the cost basis of the security being higher than its current fair value. These discrepancies generally occur because of changes in interest rates since the time of purchase, or because the credit quality of the issuer or underlying collateral has deteriorated. Merchants performs a quarterly analysis of each security in its portfolio to determine if impairment exists, and if it does, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary.


Agency MBSs and Agency CMOs consist of pools of residential mortgages which are guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), or Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) with various origination dates and maturities. Non-Agency CMOs and ABSs are tracked individually with updates on the performance of the underlying collateral provided at least quarterly. Additionally, Merchants performs stress testing of individual bonds that experience greater levels of market volatility, with the assistance of an outside investment manager. Merchants sold two low yielding Agency CMOs with a book value of $4.80 million for a loss of $21 thousand in early October 2010. These two securities were written down to their fair value at September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell them in a subsequent period.


Of the five bonds in the non-Agency CMO portfolio, two have small unrealized gains. One of the remaining three bonds, with a fair value of $1.14 million was sold in early October 2010 for a loss of $51 thousand. This bond was written down to its fair value as of September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell it in a subsequent period. Management has performed analyses on the remaining two bonds with a fair value of $5.74 million and an unrealized loss of $300 thousand as of September 30, 2010. Merchants’ investment advisor has assisted Management in running various cash flow analyses on the bonds to determine the likelihood of a principal loss in the future and the default rate and loss severities necessary to produce losses on these bonds. Based on these analyses, Merchants believes that it will recover its amortized cost on these securities.


At September 30, 2010, the ABS portfolio consisted of three bonds, one of which, with a book value of $357 thousand and a current market value of $371 thousand, carries an Agency guarantee. Merchants has performed no further analysis on this bond. Of the remaining two bonds, one bond, with a fair value of $1.08 million was sold in early October 2010 for a loss of $16 thousand. This bond was written down to its fair value as of September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell it in a subsequent period.




8




The remaining bond in the ABS portfolio has insurance backing from Ambac. Merchants places no reliance on the insurance wrap in its impairment analysis. The bond is rated CC by Standard & Poor’s and B3 by Moody’s. Merchants has recorded impairment charges on this bond totaling $122 thousand during the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2008. The book value of the bond, net of the impairment charges, is $1.21 million, and its current market value is $1.04 million. This is the only bond in Merchants’ bond portfolio with subprime exposure. Principal payments received on the bond during the first nine months of 2010 total $214 thousand, and the fair value of the bond as a percentage of book value has steadily increased over the course of 2010. Merchants has performed the same analysis on this bond as on its non-Agency CMOs discussed above and considers its remaining impairment temporary.


As a member of the FHLB system, Merchants is required to invest in stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”) in an amount determined based on its borrowings from the FHLBB. At September 30, 2010, Merchants’ investment in FHLBB stock totaled $8.63 million. In early 2009, due to deterioration in its financial condition, the FHLBB placed a moratorium on redemption of stock in excess of required levels of ownership and suspended payment of quarterly dividends on its stock. No dividend income on FHLBB stock was recorded during 2009 or through the first nine of months of 2010 and no dividend income on FHLBB stock is expected during the remainder of 2010. FHLBB announced net income of $22.90 million for the first quarter of 2010, $18.72 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $41.34 million for the third quarter of 2010, the fourth consecutive quarter of positive net income. This follows a $186.80 million net loss for 2009. The 2009 loss was primarily driven by losses due to the other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) of its investment in private label MBS resulting in a credit loss of $444.10 million for 2009. FHLBB continues to be classified as “adequately capitalized” by its regulator. Based on current available information, Merchants does not believe that its investment in FHLBB stock is impaired. Merchants will continue to monitor its investment in FHLBB stock for impairment.


Merchants does not intend to sell the investment securities that are in an unrealized loss position, and it is unlikely that Merchants will be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity.


Note 3: Fair Value of Financial Instruments


Merchants applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820 (“ASC 820”), “Fair Value Measurements,” for fair value measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Under ASC 820, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:


>

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

>

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

>

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).


A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including:


 

1.

transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2;

 

 

 

 

2.

presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements gross (rather than net) for Level 3 fair value measurements;

 

 

 

 

3.

presentation of fair value disclosures for classes of assets and liabilities; and

 

 

 

 

4.

for Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements, provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.




9




The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This ASC will not have an impact on the way Merchants measures fair value.


The table below presents the balance of financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 measured at fair value on a recurring basis:


 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using


(In thousands)
Description

Total

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

As of September 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale debt securities

 

 

 

 

    U.S. Treasury Obligations

$       251 

$         --

$       251 

$         --

    U.S. Agency Obligations

72,204 

           --

72,204 

           --

    FHLB Obligations

6,908 

           --

6,908 

           --

    Agency MBSs

158,118 

           --

158,118 

           --

    Agency CMOs

256,371 

           --

256,371 

           --

    Non-Agency CMOs

7,069 

           --

7,069 

           --

    ABS

2,496 

           --

2,496 

           --

        Total available-for-sale debt securities

503,417 

           --

503,417 

           --

Derivatives

 

 

 

 

    Interest rate swaps

(1,761)

           --

(1,761)

           --

        Total derivatives

(1,761)

           --

(1,761)

           --

Total

$501,656 

$         --

$501,656 

$         --

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale debt securities

 

 

 

 

    U.S. Treasury Obligations

$       250 

$         --

$       250 

$         --

    U.S. Agency Obligations

40,378 

           --

40,378 

           --

    FHLB Obligations

13,249 

           --

13,249 

           --

    Agency MBSs

190,995 

           --

190,995 

           --

    Agency CMOs

153,041 

           --

153,041 

           --

    Non-Agency CMOs

6,862 

           --

6,862 

           --

    ABS

2,877 

           --

2,877 

           --

        Total available-for-sale debt securities

407,652 

           --

407,652 

           --

Derivatives

 

 

 

 

    Interest rate swaps

(655)

           --

(655)

           --

        Total derivatives

(655)

           --

(655)

           --

Total

$406,997 

$         --

$406,997 

$         --


Investment securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The prices for these instruments are obtained through an independent pricing service or dealer market participant with which Merchants has historically transacted both purchases and sales of investment securities. Prices obtained from these sources include market quotations and matrix pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.




10




Certain assets are also measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These other financial assets include impaired loans and OREO. The table below presents the balance of financial assets at September 30, 2010 measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:


 

 

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using


(In thousands)
Description

9/30/2010

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

OREO

$      20

         --

         --

$      20

Impaired loans

3,437

         --

         --

3,437

        Total

$ 3,457

$       --

$      --

$ 3,457


In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Subtopic 310-10-35, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 15,” Merchants had collateral dependent impaired loans with a carrying value of approximately $3.44 million which had specific reserves included in the allowance for loan losses of $190 thousand at September 30, 2010.


Merchants uses the fair value of underlying collateral to estimate the specific reserves for collateral dependent impaired loans. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. Real estate values are determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers hired by Merchants. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Management’s ongoing review of appraisal information may result in additional discounts or adjustments to valuation based upon more recent market sales activity or more current appraisal information derived from properties of similar type and/or locale. Other business assets are valued using a variety of approaches including appraisals, depreciated book value, purchase price and independent confirmation of accounts receivable. OREO in the table above consists of property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower of cost or the estimated fair value of the property, determined by an independent appraisal, and is adjusted for estimated disposal costs. Because of the significant amount of judgment involved in valuing both collateral dependent impaired loans and OREO these assets are classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.


FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10-50, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” as amended, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents and the FHLB stock approximate fair value. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below.


Loans - The fair value for loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates and spreads currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The fair value estimates, methods and assumptions set forth below for Merchants’ financial instruments, including those financial instruments carried at cost, are made solely to comply with disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and do not always incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value proscribed by ASC 820-10 and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and associated footnotes.


Deposits - The fair value of demand deposits approximates the amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of variable rate, fixed term certificates of deposit also approximates the carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of fixed rate and fixed term certificates of deposit is estimated using a discounted cash flow method which applies interest rates currently being offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.


Debt - The fair value of debt is estimated using current market rates for borrowings of similar remaining maturity.


Interest rate swap - The interest rate swaps are reported at their fair value of $(1.76) million and $(655) thousand as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, utilizing Level 2 inputs from third parties. The fair value of Merchants’ interest rate swaps are determined using prices obtained from a third party advisor. The fair value measurement of the interest rate swap is determined by netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on the expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market interest rate curves.




11




Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit - The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of financial standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties. The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is approximately $40 thousand and $38 thousand as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.


The fair value of Merchants’ financial instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized in the table below:


 

September 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

(In thousands)

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying
Amount

 

Fair Value

Securities available for sale

$    502,467

 

$    502,467

 

$    407,652

 

$    407,652

Securities held to maturity

865

 

950

 

1,159

 

1,248

Loans, net of the Allowance for loan losses

896,816

 

920,387

 

907,562

 

918,548

Accrued interest receivable

5,222

 

5,222

 

4,781

 

4,781

 

$ 1,405,370

 

$ 1,429,026

 

$ 1,321,154

 

$ 1,332,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

$ 1,072,649

 

$ 1,075,946

 

$ 1,043,319

 

$ 1,044,907

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
 and other short-term borrowings

175,133

 

175,628

 

179,718

 

179,761

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
 and other long-term borrowings

85,158

 

90,238

 

85,215

 

89,184

Junior subordinated debentures issued to
 unconsolidated subsidiary trust

20,619

 

14,546

 

20,619

 

14,938

Accrued interest payable

740

 

740

 

844

 

844

 

$ 1,354,299

 

$ 1,357,098

 

$ 1,329,715

 

$ 1,329,634


Note 4: Pension


Merchants formerly had a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) covering all eligible employees which was a final average pay plan with benefits based on the average salary rates using the five consecutive Plan years of the last ten years that produce the highest average salary. The Plan was curtailed in 1995, all accrued benefits were fully vested and no additional years of service or age will be accrued.


The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit costs for the periods indicated:


 

Three months ended
September 30,

 

Nine months ended
September 30,

(In thousands)

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

Interest cost

$ 121 

 

$ 123 

 

$ 362 

 

$ 376 

Service cost

14 

 

11 

 

41 

 

39 

Expected return on Plan assets

(150)

 

(102)

 

(450)

 

(282)

Amortization of net loss

60 

 

103 

 

181 

 

244 

Net periodic benefit cost

$   45 

 

$ 135 

 

$ 134 

 

$ 377 


Merchants made a $2.30 million contribution to the Plan during 2009 and has made no contributions during 2010.


Merchants' Pension Plan Investment Policy Statement sets forth the investment objectives and constraints of the Plan. The purpose of the policy is to assist the Merchants’ Retirement Plan Committee in effectively supervising, monitoring and evaluating the investments of the Plan.




12




Note 5: Earnings Per Share


The following table presents reconciliations of the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the periods indicated:


 

For the
Three Months
Ended September 30,

 

For the
Nine Months
Ended September 30,

(In thousands except per share data)

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$ 4,502

 

$ 3,714

 

$ 12,917

 

$ 8,683

Weighted average common shares outstanding

6,172

 

6,120

 

6,162

 

6,094

Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents

4

 

1

 

1

 

2

Weighted average common and common equivalent
 shares outstanding

6,176

 

6,121

 

6,163

 

6,096

Basic earnings per common share

$   0.73

 

$   0.61

 

$     2.10

 

$   1.42

Diluted earnings per common share

$   0.73

 

$   0.61

 

$     2.10

 

$   1.42


Basic earnings per common share were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. There were approximately 10,000 weighted average stock options for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 that were not considered in the calculation of diluted earnings per share since the stock options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price during these periods. There were approximately 55,970 and 44,385 weighted average stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, that were not considered in the calculation of diluted earnings per share since the stock options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price during these periods.


Note 6: Stock Repurchase Program


In January 2007, Merchants’ Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which Merchants could repurchase 200,000 shares of its common stock from time to time through January 2008. The program was extended by the Board of Directors at its meetings in January 2008, 2009 and 2010, and the program has now been extended to January 2011. Merchants has purchased 143,475 shares of its common stock on the open market under the program at an average per share price of $22.94. No shares were purchased during 2009 or the first nine months of 2010 under the program.


Note 7: Commitments and Contingencies


Merchants is a party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees. Such instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk that are not recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


Merchants does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Merchants to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally arise in connection with lending relationships. The credit risk involved in issuing these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Contingent obligations under standby letters of credit totaled approximately $4.00 million at September 30, 2010 and represent the maximum potential future payments Merchants could be required to make. Typically, these instruments have terms of 12 months or less and expire unused; therefore, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer is evaluated individually for creditworthiness under the same underwriting standards used for commitments to extend credit for on balance sheet instruments. Merchants’ policies governing loan collateral apply to standby letters of credit at the time of credit extension. Loan-to-value ratios are generally consistent with loan-to-value requirements for other commercial loans secured by similar types of collateral. The fair value of Merchants’ standby letters of credit at September 30, 2010 was insignificant.


Merchants is involved in routine legal proceedings that occur in the ordinary course of business, which, individually and in the aggregate, are believed by Management to be immaterial to its financial condition and results of operations.




13




Note 8: Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310) – “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The main objective in developing this updated guidance is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. This updated guidance requires additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing an entity’s credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. Merchants has determined that this guidance will not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe Merchants’ future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “potential,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “target” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results. Merchants’ actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among others, general, national, regional or local economic conditions which are less favorable than anticipated, including continued global recession, impacting the performance of Merchants’ investment portfolio, quality of credits or the overall demand for services; changes in loan default and charge-off rates which could affect the allowance for credit losses; declines in the equity and financial markets; reductions in deposit levels which could necessitate increased and/or higher cost borrowing to fund loans and investments; declines in mortgage loan refinancing, equity loan and line of credit activity which could reduce net interest and non-interest income; changes in the domestic interest rate environment and inflation; changes in the carrying value of investment securities and other assets; further actions by the U.S. government and Treasury Department that could have a negative impact on Merchants’ investment portfolio and earnings; misalignment of Merchants’ interest-bearing assets and liabilities; increases in loan repayment rates affecting interest income; changing business, banking, or regulatory conditions or policies, or new legislation affecting the financial services industry, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, that could lead to changes in the competitive balance among financial institutions, restrictions on bank activities, changes in costs (including deposit insurance premiums), increased regulatory scrutiny, declines in consumer confidence in depository institutions, or changes in the secondary market for bank loan and other products; and changes in accounting rules, federal and state laws, IRS regulations, and other regulations and policies governing financial holding companies and their subsidiaries which may impact Merchants’ ability to take appropriate action to protect Merchants’ financial interests in certain loan situations.


Investors should not place undue reliance on Merchants’ forward-looking statements, and are cautioned that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Actual performance and results of operations may differ materially from those projected or suggested in the forward-looking statements due to certain risks and uncertainties, which are included in more detail in Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Merchants does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.


General

All adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of Merchants’ interim consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2010, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, have been included. The information was prepared from the unaudited financial statements of Merchants and its subsidiaries, Merchants Bank and MBVT Statutory Trust I.


Recent Market Developments

Certain segments of the financial services industry are facing challenges in the face of prolonged economic uncertainty. In some areas, declines in the housing market, increasing foreclosures and rising unemployment have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital; to merge with larger and stronger institutions, and, in some cases, to fail. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) closed 140 banks in 2009 and has closed over 139 as of October 2010, compared to 25 bank closures in 2008. To date, the markets Merchants’ serves have been impacted to a lesser extent than many areas around the country. However, a prolonged recession and persistently adverse economic conditions would likely impact these markets more significantly over time, and have a negative impact upon Merchants’ financial condition and performance.




14




In response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets, there have been many announcements of federal programs designed to purchase or insure assets from, provide equity capital to, and guarantee the liquidity of, the industry. There can be no assurance that government action will help stabilize the U.S. financial system and will not have unintended adverse consequences on Merchants.


Financial Regulatory Reform Legislation

On July 21, 2010, the President signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Act”), which comprehensively reforms the regulation of financial institutions, products and services. Among other things, the Act provides for new capital standards that eliminate the treatment of trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital. Existing trust preferred securities are grandfathered for banking entities with less than $15 billion of assets, such as Merchants. The Act permanently raises deposit insurance levels to $250,000, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and extends for two years the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, which will become mandatory for all insured depository institutions. Pursuant to modifications under the Act, deposit insurance assessments will be calculated based on an insured depository institution’s assets rather than its insured deposits and the minimum reserve ratio will be raised to 1.35%. The payment of interest on business demand deposit accounts is permitted by the Act. The Act authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to regulate interchange fees for debit card transactions and establishes new minimum mortgage underwriting standards for residential mortgages. The Act also establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (“CFPB”) as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board. The CFPB has the exclusive authority to prescribe rules governing the provision of consumer financial products and services.


The Act grants the SEC express authority to adopt rules granting proxy access for shareholder nominees, and grants shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and “golden parachute” payments. Pursuant to modifications of the proxy rules under the Act, Merchants will be required to disclose the relationship between executive pay and financial performance, the ratio of the median pay of all employees to the pay of the chief executive officer, and employee and director hedging activities, if applicable. The Act also requires that stock exchanges change their listing rules to require that each member of a listed company’s compensation committee be independent and be granted the authority and funding to retain independent advisors and to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that does not adopt policies governing the claw back of excess executive compensation based on inaccurate financial statements.


Results of Operations


Overview

Net income was $4.50 million and $12.92 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. This compares with net income of $3.71 million and $8.68 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively. The return on average assets was 1.25% and 1.21% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 1.07% and 0.85% for the same periods in 2009, respectively. The return on average equity was 18.39% and 18.14% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and was 17.37% and 13.93% for the same periods in 2009, respectively.


The following were the major factors contributing to the results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009:


 

Merchants’ taxable equivalent net interest income for the third quarter of 2010 was $12.82 million, and was $38.13 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $12.79 million for the third quarter of 2009 and $37.55 million for the first nine months of 2009.

 

 

 

 

Merchants recorded a $400 thousand negative provision for credit losses for the third quarter of 2010 and recorded a $200 thousand provision for credit losses for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $600 thousand for the third quarter of 2009 and $3.50 million for the first nine months of 2009.

 

 

 

 

Merchants recognized $685 thousand in pre-tax security gains during the third quarter of 2010 and $1.90 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $261 thousand for the third quarter of 2009 and $56 thousand for the first nine months of 2009. Merchants also recognized $89 thousand in impairment losses during the third quarter of 2010 related to the sale of four securities at small losses just after the end of the quarter. Year to date impairment losses total $169 thousand as a result of an $80 thousand OTTI charge taken during the first quarter of 2010 combined with the sales just mentioned.

 

 

 

 

Loans were $906.91 million at September 30, 2010, a decrease of $11.63 million compared to December 31, 2010.




15





 

Merchants’ investment portfolio increased to $503.33 million at September 30, 2010 from $408.81 million at December 31, 2009 as Merchants redeployed short term cash into the investment portfolio.

 

 

 

 

Total deposits ended the quarter at $1.07 billion, a $29.33 million increase from deposits at December 31, 2009.


Net Interest Income

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the tables on the following three pages. Merchants’ taxable equivalent net interest income for the third quarter of 2010 was $12.82 million, and was $38.13 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $12.79 million for the third quarter of 2009 and $37.55 million for the first nine months of 2009. Merchants’ taxable equivalent net interest margin decreased to 3.70% for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 3.77% for the third quarter of 2009 and decreased by six basis points to 3.75% for the first nine months of 2010 from 3.81% for the same period in 2009.


Merchants’ average rate on interest earning assets decreased 42 basis points to 4.50% for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 4.92% for the same period in 2009; and decreased 54 basis points to 4.59% from 5.13% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. This decrease is a result of the sustained low interest rate environment, combined with some flattening of the yield curve during late 2010. The average yield on the investment portfolio has decreased 146 basis points to 3.33% for the third quarter of 2010 from 4.79% for the same period last year; and by 139 basis points to 3.53% for the first nine months of 2010 from 4.92% for the same period in 2009. Over 80% of Merchants’ portfolio is in agency backed mortgage product. Cash flows off these sectors have been extremely high in the current interest rate environment. Merchants has chosen to reinvest that cash flow in short, high quality bonds instead of taking on credit or extension risk to obtain a higher yield.


Merchants has been successful at reducing its average cost of interest bearing liabilities during 2010. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased to 0.91% for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 1.31% for the same period in 2009, and decreased to 0.96% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 1.49% for the same period in 2009. The largest percentage decrease is in the cost of interest bearing deposits, which have been reduced by almost half year to date. Merchants also reduced its cost of long term debt by approximately 66 basis points year to date, primarily a result of the prepayment of over $60 million in FHLB debt at an average cost of 3.74% during 2009. These decreases have been offset by increases in the cost of short-term repo agreements which have increased by approximately 52 basis points during 2010 as Merchants expands its government banking business. This funding source is accompanied by a loan for an almost equal amount at a competitive tax-adjusted spread.


The following table attributes changes in Merchants’ net interest income (on a fully taxable equivalent basis) to changes in either average balances or average rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. Changes due to both interest rate and volume have been allocated to change due to volume and change due to rate in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each category:




16




Analysis of Changes in Fully Taxable Equivalent Net Interest Income


Three Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase

 

Due to

(In thousands)

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Volume

 

Rate

Fully taxable equivalent interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Loans

$ 11,970

 

$ 12,171

 

$   (201)

 

$  (64)

 

$   (137)

    Investments

3,562

 

4,458

 

(896)

 

605 

 

(1,501)

    Interest earning deposits with banks and other
     short-term investments

23

 

42

 

(19)

 

(17)

 

(2)

        Total interest income

15,555

 

16,671

 

(1,116)

 

524 

 

(1,640)

Less interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Savings, money market & NOW accounts

358

 

429

 

(71)

 

51 

 

(122)

    Time deposits

994

 

1,806

 

(812)

 

(185)

 

(627)

    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase,
     short-term

374

 

201

 

173 

 

64 

 

109 

    Securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
     long-term

500

 

500

 

-- 

 

-- 

 

-- 

    Other long-term debt

216

 

649

 

(433)

 

(345)

 

(88)

    Junior subordinated debentures issued to
     unconsolidated subsidiary trust

297

 

298

 

(1)

 

-- 

 

(1)

        Total interest expense

2,739

 

3,883

 

(1,144)

 

(415)

 

(729)

        Net interest income

$ 12,816

 

$ 12,788

 

$      28 

 

$ 939 

 

$   (911)


Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase

 

Due to

(In thousands)

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Volume

 

Rate

Fully taxable equivalent interest income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Loans

$ 35,471

 

$ 35,932

 

$   (461)

 

$    790 

 

$(1,251)

    Investments

11,115

 

14,480

 

(3,365)

 

965 

 

(4,330)

    Interest earning deposits with banks and other
     short-term investments

68

 

56

 

12 

 

(6)

 

18 

        Total interest income

46,654

 

50,468

 

(3,814)

 

1,749 

 

(5,563)

Less interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Savings, money market & NOW accounts

1,116

 

1,492

 

(376)

 

192 

 

(568)

    Time deposits

3,222

 

6,259

 

(3,037)

 

(455)

 

(2,582)

    Federal funds purchased, FHLB and other
      short-term borrowings

2

 

20

 

(18)

 

(10)

 

(8)

    Securities sold under agreements to repurchase,
     short-term

1,162

 

313

 

849 

 

123 

 

726 

    Securities sold under agreement to repurchase,
     long-term

1,484

 

1,470

 

14 

 

-- 

 

14 

    Other long-term debt

645

 

2,468

 

(1,823)

 

(1,417)

 

(406)

    Junior subordinated debentures issued to
     unconsolidated subsidiary trust

891

 

893

 

(2)

 

-- 

 

(2)

        Total interest expense

8,522

 

12,915

 

(4,393)

 

(1,567)

 

(2,826)

        Net interest income

$ 38,132

 

$ 37,553

 

$    579 

 

$ 3,316 

 

$(2,737)





17




The following tables sets forth certain information regarding net interest margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. For the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest bearing liabilities, are expressed both in dollars and rates, and on a tax equivalent basis.


Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Average Balance Sheets and Average Rates

(Unaudited)


 

Three Months Ended

 

September 30, 2010

 

September 30, 2009

(In thousands, fully taxable equivalent)

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income/
Expense

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income/
Expense

 

Average
Rate

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, including fees on loans (a)

$    917,682 

 

$ 11,970 

 

5.17%

 

$   922,704 

 

$ 12,171 

 

5.23%

Investments (b) (c)

425,036 

 

3,562 

 

3.33%

 

369,353 

 

4,458 

 

4.79%

Interest earning deposits with banks and other short
 term investments

29,683 

 

23 

 

0.31%

 

53,576 

 

42 

 

0.31%

        Total interest earning assets

1,372,401 

 

$ 15,555 

 

4.50%

 

1,345,633 

 

$ 16,671 

 

4.92%

Allowance for loan losses

(10,461)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,958)

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

30,123 

 

 

 

 

 

25,369 

 

 

 

 

Bank premises and equipment, net

13,578 

 

 

 

 

 

11,867 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

31,449 

 

 

 

 

 

22,546 

 

 

 

 

        Total assets

$1,437,090 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,394,457 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Savings, NOW & money market accounts

$   553,625 

 

$      358 

 

0.26%

 

$   492,532 

 

$      429 

 

0.35%

    Time deposits

370,532 

 

994 

 

1.06%

 

417,412 

 

1,806 

 

1.72%

        Total interest bearing deposits

924,157 

 

1,352 

 

0.58%

 

909,944 

 

2,235 

 

0.97%

FHLB and other short-term borrowings

1,695 

 

-- 

 

0.00%

 

981 

 

-- 

 

0.00%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term

159,043 

 

374 

 

0.93%

 

114,466 

 

201 

 

0.70%

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, long-term

54,000 

 

500 

 

3.67%

 

54,000 

 

500 

 

3.67%

Other long-term debt

31,165 

 

216 

 

2.75%

 

79,107 

 

649 

 

3.25%

Junior subordinated debentures issued to
 unconsolidated subsidiary trust

20,619 

 

297 

 

5.69%

 

20,619 

 

298 

 

5.77%

        Total borrowed funds

266,522 

 

1,387 

 

2.06%

 

269,173 

 

1,648 

 

2.43%

        Total interest bearing liabilities

1,190,679 

 

$   2,739 

 

0.91%

 

1,179,117 

 

$   3,883 

 

1.31%

Noninterest bearing deposits

135,434 

 

 

 

 

 

116,583 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

13,061 

 

 

 

 

 

13,209 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

97,916 

 

 

 

 

 

85,548 

 

 

 

 

        Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$1,437,090 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,394,457 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest earning assets

$   181,722 

 

 

 

 

 

$   166,516 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)

 

 

$ 12,816 

 

 

 

 

 

$ 12,788 

 

 

Tax equivalent adjustment

 

 

(386)

 

 

 

 

 

(92)

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

$ 12,430 

 

 

 

 

 

$ 12,696 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest rate spread

 

 

 

 

3.58%

 

 

 

 

 

3.61%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

3.70%

 

 

 

 

 

3.77%


(a)

Includes principal balance of non-accrual loans and fees on loans.

(b)

Available for sale securities and held to maturity securities are included at amortized cost. Includes FHLB stock.

(c)

Tax exempt interest has been converted to a tax equivalent basis using the Federal tax rate of 35%.




18




Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Average Balance Sheets and Average Rates

(Unaudited)


 

Nine Months Ended

 

September 30, 2010

 

September 30, 2009

(In thousands, fully taxable equivalent)

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income/
Expense

 

Average
Rate

 

Average
Balance

 

Interest
Income/
Expense

 

Average
Rate

ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans, including fees on loans (a)

$   914,828 

 

$ 35,471 

 

5.18%

 

$   895,090 

 

$ 35,932 

 

5.37%

Investments (b) (c) (d)

421,348 

 

11,115 

 

3.53%

 

393,585 

 

14,480 

 

4.92%

Interest earning deposits with banks and other short
 term investments

23,933 

 

68 

 

0.38%

 

27,421 

 

56 

 

0.27%

        Total interest earning assets

1,360,109 

 

$ 46,654 

 

4.59%

 

1,316,096 

 

$ 50,468 

 

5.13%

Allowance for loan losses

(10,586)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,066)

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

27,111 

 

 

 

 

 

25,281 

 

 

 

 

Bank premises and equipment, net

13,400 

 

 

 

 

 

11,740 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

32,226 

 

 

 

 

 

21,103 

 

 

 

 

        Total assets

$1,422,259 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,364,154 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest bearing deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Savings, NOW & Money Market accounts

$   541,053 

 

$   1,116 

 

0.28%

 

$   471,555 

 

$   1,492 

 

0.42%

    Time deposits

377,766 

 

3,222 

 

1.14%

 

409,617 

 

6,259 

 

2.04%

        Total interest bearing deposits

918,819 

 

4,338 

 

0.63%

 

881,172 

 

7,751 

 

1.18%

FHLB and other short-term borrowings

2,469 

 

 

0.13%

 

9,125 

 

20 

 

0.29%

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, short-term

162,103 

 

1,162 

 

0.96%

 

95,188 

 

313 

 

0.44%

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, long-term

54,000 

 

1,484 

 

3.67%

 

54,000 

 

1,470 

 

3.64%

Other long-term debt

31,190 

 

645 

 

2.77%

 

96,340 

 

2,468 

 

3.43%

Junior subordinated debentures issued to
 unconsolidated subsidiary trust

20,619 

 

891 

 

5.69%

 

20,619 

 

893 

 

5.77%

        Total borrowed funds

270,380 

 

4,184 

 

2.07%

 

275,272 

 

5,164 

 

2.51%

        Total interest bearing liabilities

1,189,199 

 

$   8,522 

 

0.96%

 

1,156,444 

 

$ 12,915 

 

1.49%

Noninterest bearing deposits

125,489 

 

 

 

 

 

111,089 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

12,654 

 

 

 

 

 

13,502 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

94,917 

 

 

 

 

 

83,119 

 

 

 

 

        Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$1,422,259 

 

 

 

 

 

$1,364,154 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest earning assets

$   170,910 

 

 

 

 

 

$   159,652 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)

 

 

$ 38,132 

 

 

 

 

 

$ 37,553 

 

 

Tax equivalent adjustment

 

 

(796)

 

 

 

 

 

(141)

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

$ 37,336 

 

 

 

 

 

$ 37,412 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest rate spread

 

 

 

 

3.63%

 

 

 

 

 

3.64%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

3.75%

 

 

 

 

 

3.81%


(a)

Includes principal balance of non-accrual loans and fees on loans.

(b)

Available for sale securities and held to maturity securities are included at amortized cost. Includes FHLB stock.

(c)

Tax exempt interest has been converted to a tax equivalent basis using the Federal tax rate of 35%.

(d)

Includes impact of $200 thousand in accelerated premium amortization on CMOs.





19




Provision for Credit Losses: Due to improved performance in non-performing assets and a significant recovery of previously charged off loans, Merchants recorded a $400 thousand negative provision in the third quarter of 2010 resulting in a net provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $200 thousand. This compares to $600 thousand for the third quarter of 2009 and $3.5 million for the first nine months of 2009. There are a number of factors that support this credit provision:


 

Net recoveries of previously charged off loans during the third quarter totaled $415 thousand;

 

 

 

 

Non-accruing loans decreased over 75% to $3.38 million at September 30, 2010 from $14.30 million at December 31, 2009, and have decreased almost 60% from $8.28 million at June 30, 2010;

 

 

 

 

Total loans decreased to $906.91 million at September 30, 2010 compared to $918.54 million at December 31, 2009; and

 

 

 

 

Internally classified loans decreased 26.5% since June 30, 2010 and decreased by 34.1% since December 31, 2009.


A historical summary of the loan loss reserve follows:


As of:

 

September 30, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

 

September 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Allowance for Loan Losses (in millions)

 

$10.09

 

$10.98

 

$11.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of Total Loans

 

1.11%

 

1.19%

 

1.14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of Non-Performing Loans

 

294%

 

76%

 

106%


Approximately $322 thousand in non-accruing loans carry some form of government guarantee. All of the previously mentioned factors are taken into consideration during management’s quarterly review of the allowance for credit losses (the “Allowance”) which management continues to deem reasonable at September 30, 2010. See “Nonperforming Assets and the Allowance” for additional information on the provision, the Allowance and the allowance for loan losses.


Noninterest Income: Total noninterest income increased to $3.03 million and $9.09 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, from $2.60 million and $6.94 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively. Excluding net gains (losses) on security sales and other than temporary impairment losses, noninterest income increased to $2.43 million and $7.36 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $2.34 million and $6.88 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively. Trust division income increased to $539 thousand and $1.59 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $441 thousand and $1.26 million for the same periods last year. Revenue related to service charges on deposits decreased to $1.22 million for the third quarter of 2010 compared to $1.49 million for the third quarter of 2009, and to $3.85 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $4.22 million for the same period in 2009. These decreases are almost entirely related to reduced overdraft service charge revenue. Net overdraft fee revenue for the third quarter of 2010 was $1.00 million and was $3.20 million year to date, compared to $1.25 million for the third quarter of 2009 and $3.51 million for the first nine months of 2009. Reductions in overdraft fee revenue are almost entirely a result of legislative changes that went into effect on August 15, 2010. At this point it is not possible to predict the ultimate impact of the legislative change on future overdraft income. At the same time, Other noninterest income increased to $1.08 million from $952 thousand for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 2009, and increased to $3.18 million from $2.88 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 2009. This increase is primarily a result of increased net debit card income. The recently enacted Dodd-Frank bill authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to regulate debit card interchange fees. Although these changes are aimed at large banks it is possible that all banks will be impacted. It is not possible at this time to predict what impact the changes will have on Merchants’ debit card revenue.


Noninterest Expense: Total noninterest expense increased to $10.00 million from $9.80 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 2009; and decreased to $29.09 million from $29.68 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 2009. There were a number of increases and decreases that contributed to this overall decrease. Salaries and wages increased to $4.10 million and $11.70 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared to $3.68 million and $10.30 million for the same periods in 2009, respectively. Merchants increased staff in its corporate banking and trust areas during 2010. Additionally, Merchants’ strong results for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 2009 have led to a higher incentive accrual for 2010. Merchants’ FDIC insurance expense for 2010 is lower than 2009 as a result of the $630 thousand special assessment recorded during the second quarter of 2009. Additionally, Merchants booked expense recoveries and gains during 2010 related to sales of OREO properties leading to a negative year to date expense of $299 thousand compared to an expense of $305 thousand for the first nine months of 2009. During 2009, Other noninterest expenses were negatively impacted by prepayment penalties on FHLB debt totaling $280 thousand for the third quarter of 2009 and $584 thousand for the first nine months of 2009.




20




Balance Sheet Analysis


Merchants’ quarterly average loans for the third quarter of 2010 were $917.68 million, a decrease of $3.16 million over the fourth quarter of 2009, and ending balances at September 30, 2010 were $906.91 million, $11.63 million lower than balances at December 31, 2009. Loan demand in Merchants’ markets remained soft during 2010 as many businesses are continuing to pay down term debt and substantially reducing utilization of credit lines. This trend combined with the previously discussed reduction in substandard loans has dampened growth in the loan portfolio this year.


The following table summarizes the components of Merchants’ loan portfolio as of the periods indicated:


(In thousands)

September 30, 2010

June 30, 2010

December 31, 2009

Commercial, financial and agricultural loans

$ 100,638

$ 109,805

$ 113,980

Municipal loans

71,822

31,940

44,753

Real estate loans – residential

428,260

435,070

435,273

Real estate loans – commercial

279,885

279,958

290,737

Real estate loans – construction

17,600

30,864

25,146

Installment loans

7,507

7,387

7,711

All other loans

1,194

795

938

Total loans

$ 906,906

$ 895,819

$ 918,538


Merchants’ investment portfolio totaled $503.33 million at September 30, 2010, an increase of $94.52 million from the December 31, 2009 ending balance of $408.81 million. Merchants has taken advantage of favorable pricing during 2010 and captured gains on several of its MBS that appeared to have heightened prepayment risk. Merchants sold bonds during the third quarter of 2010 with a total par value of $13.90 million for a net pre-tax gain of $686 thousand. During the first nine months of 2010, Merchants sold bonds with a total par value of $43.06 million for a net pre-tax gain of $1.90 million. Additionally, as discussed further below, Merchants sold two non-agency CMOs and two low yielding Agency CMOs during early October 2010 for a total loss of $89 thousand. These bonds were marked down to their fair value as of September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell them in a subsequent period. These selective bond sales will help to better position Merchants’ investment portfolio from a credit and interest rate risk standpoint.


Merchants’ investment portfolio at September 30, 2010, including both held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities, consisted of the following:


(In thousands)

Cost

 

Value

U. S. Treasury Obligations

$        250

 

$        251

U.S. Agency Obligations

71,581

 

72,204

FHLB Obligations

6,567

 

6,908

Agency MBS

151,103

 

158,117

Agency CMO

254,405

 

256,371

Non-agency CMO

7,365

 

7,070

ABS

2,656

 

2,496

Total invesments

$ 493,927

 

$ 503,417


Agency MBSs and Agency CMOs consist of pools of residential mortgages which are guaranteed by FNMA, FHLMC, or GNMA with various origination dates and maturities. Non-Agency CMOs and ABSs are tracked individually with updates on the performance of the underlying collateral provided at least quarterly. Additionally, Merchants performs stress testing of individual bonds that experience greater levels of market volatility, with the assistance of an outside investment manager. Merchants sold two low yielding CMOs with a book value of $4.80 million for a loss of $21 thousand in early October 2010. These two securities were written down to their fair value at September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell them in a subsequent period.


The non-Agency CMO portfolio consists of five bonds, two of which have small unrealized gains. One of these bonds, with a fair value of $1.14 million was sold in early October for a loss of $51 thousand. This bond was written down to its fair value as of September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell it in a subsequent period. Management has performed analyses on the remaining two bonds with a fair value of $5.74 million and an unrealized loss of $300 thousand as of September 30, 2010. Merchants’ investment advisor has assisted Management in running various cash flow analyses on the bonds to determine the likelihood of a principal loss in the future and the default rate and loss severities necessary to produce losses on these bonds. Based on these analyses, Merchants believes that it will recover its amortized cost on these securities.




21




The ABS portfolio consists of three bonds, one of which, with a book value of $357 thousand and a current market value of $371 thousand, carries an Agency guarantee. Merchants has performed no further analysis on this bond. Of the remaining two bonds, one bond, with a fair value of $1.08 million was sold in early October for a loss of $16 thousand. This bond was written down to its fair value as of September 30, 2010 due to Merchants’ intent to sell it in a subsequent period.


The remaining bond in the ABS portfolio also has insurance backing from Ambac. Merchants places no reliance on the insurance wrap in its impairment analysis. The bond is rated CC by Standard & Poor’s and B3 by Moody’s. Merchants has recorded impairment charges on this bond totalling $122 thousand during the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2008. The book value of the bond, net of the impairment charges, is $1.21 million, and its current market value is $1.04 million. This is the only bond in Merchants’ bond portfolio with subprime exposure. Principal payments received on the bond during 2010 total $214 thousand, and the fair value of the bond as a percentage of book value has steadily increased over the course of 2010. Merchants has performed the same analysis on this bond as on its non-Agency CMOs discussed above and considers its impairment temporary.


As a member of the FHLB system, Merchants is required to invest in stock of the FHLBB in an amount determined based on its borrowings from the FHLBB. At September 30, 2010, Merchants’ investment in FHLBB stock totaled $8.63 million. In early 2009, due to deterioration in its financial condition, the FHLBB placed a moratorium on redemption of stock in excess of required levels of ownership and suspended payment of quarterly dividends on its stock. No dividend income on FHLBB stock was recorded during 2009 or the first nine months of 2010 and no dividend income on FHLBB stock is expected during the remainder of 2010. FHLBB announced net income of $22.90 million for the first quarter of 2010, $18.72 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $41.34 million for the third quarter of 2010, the fourth consecutive quarter of positive net income. This follows a $186.80 million net loss for 2009. The 2009 loss was primarily driven by losses due to the OTTI of its investment in private label MBS resulting in a credit loss of $444.10 million for 2009. FHLBB continues to be classified as “adequately capitalized” by its regulator. Based on current available information, Merchants does not believe that its investment in FHLBB stock is impaired. Merchants will continue to monitor its investment in FHLBB stock for impairment.


Merchants does not intend to sell the investment securities that are in an unrealized loss position, and it is unlikely that Merchants will be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Current market conditions are difficult. If conditions worsen, the fair market value of Merchants’ investment portfolio could be adversely affected and it is possible that certain unrealized losses could be designated as other-than-temporary in future periods.


Total deposits at September 30, 2010 were $1.07 billion, an increase of $29 million from year end 2009 balances of $1.04 billion. Average balances for the third quarter of 2010 were $1.06 billion, an increase of $21.64 million from average balances of $1.04 billion for the fourth quarter of 2009. Since the end of 2009 there has been some migration from time deposit categories, which have decreased $24.46 million, into savings, NOW and money market accounts, which have increased $36.89 million. Demand deposits have shown solid growth during 2010, increasing almost $17 million to $136.64 million at September 30, 2010, from $119.74 million at December 31, 2009.


On December 15, 2004, Merchants closed its private placement of an aggregate of $20.00 million of trust preferred securities. These hybrid securities qualify as regulatory capital for Merchants, up to certain regulatory limits. At the same time they are considered debt for tax purposes, and as such, interest payments are fully deductible. The trust preferred securities bear interest for five years at a fixed rate of 5.95%, and after five years, the rate adjusts quarterly at a fixed spread over three-month LIBOR.


During July 2008, Merchants entered into a three-year forward interest rate swap arrangement for $10 million of its $20 million trust preferred issuance which changed to a floating rate in December 2009. The swap fixed the interest rate at 6.50% for the three year term of the swap. Merchants entered into a swap for the balance of the trust preferred issuance in March of 2009 and fixed the rate at 5.23% for seven years. Merchants’ blended cost of the trust preferred issuance beginning in December 2009 was 5.87% for a five-year average term. The trust preferred securities mature on December 31, 2034, and are redeemable without penalty at Merchants’ option, subject to prior approval by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”), beginning after five years from issuance.




22




In the ordinary course of business, Merchants makes commitments for possible future extensions of credit. At September 30, 2010, Merchants was obligated to fund $4.00 million of standby letters of credit. No losses are anticipated in connection with these commitments.


Income Taxes

Merchants and its subsidiaries are taxed on income at the federal level by the Internal Revenue Service. Total income tax expense was $4.22 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $2.49 million for the same period in 2009. Merchants recognized favorable tax benefits from federal affordable housing tax credits and historic rehabilitation credits of $1.24 million for the first nine months of 2010 and $1.42 million for the first nine months of 2009. Additionally, Merchants' recognized favorable tax benefits from tax exempt municipal loans, and tax credits from Qualified School Construction Bonds (“QSCB”). Merchants’ statutory tax rate was 35% for all periods. The recognition of affordable housing, rehabilitation and QSCB tax credits combined with tax benefits from tax exempt loans is the principal reason for Merchants’ effective tax rate of 24.62% and 22.26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in Merchants’ effective tax rate from 2009 to 2010 is attributable to increased income before taxes.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Merchants’ liquidity is monitored by the Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors, based upon Merchants Bank’s policies. As of September 30, 2010, Merchants could borrow up to $49 million in overnight funds. $44 million of this $49 million consists of unsecured borrowing lines established with correspondent banks. The balance of $5 million is in the form of an overnight line of credit with the FHLB. FHLBB borrowings are secured by residential mortgage loans. The total amount of loans pledged to the FHLB for both short and long-term borrowing arrangements totaled $195.47 million at September 30, 2010. Merchants has additional borrowing capacity with the FHLBB of $89 million as of September 30, 2010. As mentioned previously, FHLBB has suspended quarterly dividends, declared a moratorium on stock redemptions, and experienced a net loss for 2009. Although Merchants does not expect that this funding source will become unavailable, Merchants has ensured that it has other sources of readily available funds. Merchants has established a borrowing facility with the FRB which will enable Merchants to borrow at the discount window.


Additionally, Merchants has the ability to borrow through the use of repurchase agreements, collateralized by Agency MBS and Agency CMO, with certain approved counterparties. The repurchase agreements mature daily and the average rate paid on these funds year to date for 2010 was 0.96%. Merchants’ investment portfolio, which is managed by the ALCO, has a book value of $503.33 million at September 30, 2010, of which $284.23 million was pledged. The portfolio is a reliable source of cash flow for Merchants. Merchants closely monitors its short term cash position. Any excess funds are either left on deposit at the FRB, or are in a fully insured account with one of Merchants’ correspondent banks. The carrying value of the securities sold under repurchase agreements was $208.01 million and the market value was $213.32 million at September 30, 2010. Merchants maintains effective control over the securities underlying the agreements.


FHLBB short-term borrowings mature daily and there was no outstanding balance at September 30, 2010. The Demand Note Due U.S. Treasury matures daily and bears interest at the federal funds rate less 0.25%. The rate on this borrowing at September 30, 2010 was zero.




23




The following table provides certain information regarding other short term borrowed funds for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010:


(In thousands)

 

Three Months
Ended
September 30, 2010

 

Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2010

    FHLB and other short-term borrowings

 

 

 

 

        Amount outstanding at end of period

 

$ --

 

$ --

        Maximum month-end amount outstanding

 

--

 

13,000

        Average amount outstanding

 

--

 

1,092

        Weighted average-rate during the period

 

--

 

0.29%

        Weighted average rate at period end

 

--

 

--

    Demand note due U.S. Treasury

 

 

 

 

        Amount outstanding at end of period

 

$ 1,039

 

$ 1,039

        Maximum month-end amount outstanding

 

3,330

 

3,330

        Average amount outstanding

 

1,695

 

1,377

        Weighted average-rate during the period

 

--

 

--

        Weighted average rate at period-end

 

--

 

--

    Securities sold under agreement to repurchase, short term

 

 

 

 

        Amount outstanding at end of period

 

$174,094

 

$174,094

        Maximum month-end amount outstanding

 

174,094

 

174,094

        Average amount outstanding

 

159,043

 

162,103

        Weighted average-rate during the period

 

0.93%

 

0.96%

        Weighted average rate at period end

 

0.97%

 

0.97%


In January 2007, Merchants’ Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which Merchants may repurchase 200,000 shares of its common stock from time to time through January 2008. The program was extended by the Board at its meetings in January 2008, 2009 and 2010, and the program has now been extended to January 2011. Merchants has purchased 143,475 shares of its common stock on the open market under the program at an average per share price of $22.94. No shares were purchased during 2009 or the first nine months of 2010 under the program.


As of September 30, 2010, Merchants exceeded all current applicable regulatory capital requirements. Merchants continues to be considered well capitalized under current applicable regulations. Merchants’ tangible equity ratio at September 30, 2010 was 6.71% compared to 6.34% at December 31, 2009. The following table represents the actual capital ratios and capital adequacy requirements for Merchants and Merchants Bank as of September 30, 2010.




24





 

Actual

For Capital
Adequacy Purposes

To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions

(In thousands)

Amount

Percent

Amount

Percent

Amount

Percent

Merchants Bancshares, Inc.:

    Tier 1 leverage capital (1)

$ 116,891

8.13%

$ 57,484

4.00%

N/A

N/A

    Tier 1 risk-based capital (1)

116,891

14.67%

31,882

4.00%

N/A

N/A

    Total risk-based capital (1)

126,872

15.92%

63,764

8.00%

N/A

N/A

    Tangible Capital

99,500

6.71%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Merchants Bank:

    Tier 1 leverage capital

$ 114,211

7.92%

$ 57,655

4.00%

$ 72,068

5.00%

    Tier 1 risk-based capital

114,211

14.23%

32,097

4.00%

48,146

6.00%

    Total risk-based capital

124,249

15.48%

64,195

8.00%

80,243

10.00%

    Tangible Capital

117,964

7.94%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A


(1)

Amounts include $20 million in trust preferred securities issued in December 2004. These hybrid securities qualify as regulatory capital up to certain limits.


Nonperforming Assets and the Allowance

Stringent credit quality is a major strategic focus of Merchants, and management monitors asset quality on a continuous basis. Merchants cannot assure that problem assets will remain at current levels, particularly in light of current or future economic conditions. The asset balances in this category will be dynamic and subject to change as problem loans are either resolved or moved to nonperforming status based upon current developments and the latest available information.


The following table summarizes Merchants’ nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:


(In thousands)

September 30,
2010

June 30,
2010

December 31,
2009

September 30,
2009

Nonaccrual loans

$ 3,380

$ 8,277

$ 14,296

$ 10,484

Loans past due 90 days or more and
 still accruing interest

1

--

88

--

Troubled debt restructurings

56

57

97

100

    Total nonperforming loans ("NPL")

3,437

8,334

14,481

10,584

OREO

20

444

655

802

    Total nonperforming assets ("NPA")

$ 3,457

$ 8,778

$ 15,136

$ 11,386


Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2010 have decreased by $11.68 million, or 77.2%, since December 31, 2009. This reduction is attributable to a number of factors. Payments and pay-offs received on nonperforming loans have totaled $6.73 million and charge-offs have totaled $1.97 million for the first nine months of 2010. Of the total charge-offs during 2010, $1.44 million was attributable to one loan. This loan was placed on non-accruing status during the fourth quarter of 2009 and had a $1.44 million specific allocation of the reserve at year end 2009, which was then charged off during the first quarter of 2010. This borrower has since demonstrated a substantial, sustained improvement in operations and payments continue to be made on time. The loan, with a book balance of $3.04 million at September 30, 2010, has been restored to accruing status.


Excluded from the non-accrual balances discussed above are Merchants loans that are 30 to 89 days past due, which are not necessarily considered classified or impaired. Loans 30 to 89 days past due as a percentage of total loans as of the periods indicated are presented in the following table:


Quarter Ending:

 

30-89 Days

September 30, 2010

 

0.13%

June 30, 2010

 

0.26%

December 31, 2009

 

0.09%

September 30, 2009

 

0.08%




25




Merchants Bank’s residential mortgage loan portfolio continues to perform well, even under the currently stressed economic conditions. Residential loans 30 to 89 days past due at September 30, 2010 totaled 24 basis points as a percentage of residential loans. Total past due residential loans, including non-accruing mortgages, were 67 basis points of residential loans.


Loans, including impaired loans, are generally classified as nonaccrual if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, unless such loans are well collateralized and in the process of collection. If a loan or a portion of a loan is internally classified as doubtful or is partially charged-off, the loan is classified as nonaccrual. Loans that are on a current payment status or past due less than 90 days may also be classified as nonaccrual if repayment in full of principal and/or interest is in doubt. Loans deemed impaired at September 30, 2010 totaled $3.44 million, all of which are included as nonperforming loans in the table above.


Merchants’ management monitors asset quality on a continuous basis and maintains an internal listing that includes all criticized and classified loans. Merchants’ management believes that substandard loans have well-defined weaknesses which, if left unattended, could lead to collection problems. The oversight process on these loans includes an active risk management approach. A management committee reviews the status of these loans each quarter and determines or confirms the appropriate risk rating, accrual status and loan loss reserve allocation. The findings of this review process are instrumental in determining the adequacy of the Allowance.


Substandard accruing loans totaled $17.69 million at September 30 2010, an increase of $1.50 million since December 31, 2009, and a $1.64 million decrease since June 30, 2010. Of the total substandard accruing loans, $3.65 million is federally guaranteed. The listing of substandard accruing borrowers at September 30, 2010 includes borrowers operating in a variety of different industries and locations. Six borrowers represent 70% of performing classified loans.


Concentrations by collateral exposure are also monitored as part of Merchants’ risk management process. The composition of substandard accruing loans at September 30, 2010 consists of $9.69 million in loans secured by owner occupied commercial real estate, of which $2.25 million is subject to federal loan guarantees; and $6.22 million in commercial investment real estate, of which $1.40 million is government guaranteed. The balance consists of $966 thousand in loans to commercial borrowers, $588 thousand in loans for commercial construction projects and $228 thousand to other borrowers in a variety of businesses. To date, with very few exceptions, payments on accruing substandard loans continue to be made on a timely basis, consistent with prior periods.


The following table reflects Merchants’ nonperforming asset and coverage ratios as of the dates indicated:


 

September 30, 2010

June 30, 2010

December 31, 2009

September 30, 2009

NPL to total loans

0.38%

0.93%

1.58%

1.14%

NPA to total assets

0.23%

0.63%

1.05%

0.81%

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.11%

1.13%

1.19%

1.20%

Allowance for loan losses to NPL

294%

122%

76%

106%

30-89 days past due to total loans

0.13%

0.26%

0.09%

0.08%





26




The following table summarizes year to date activity in Merchants’ Allowance through the dates indicated:


(In thousands)

September 30, 2010

June 30, 2010

December 31, 2009

September 30, 2009

Balance, beginning of year

$ 11,702 

$ 11,702 

$   9,311 

$   9,311 

Charge-offs :

 

 

 

 

    Commercial, financial & agricultural

(1,686)

(1,637)

(1,355)

(545)

    Real estate – commercial

(258)

(259)

(258)

(208)

    Real estate – construction

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

    Real estate – residential

(24)

(5)

(255)

(254)

    Installment

(2)

(2)

(8)

(5)

        Total charge-offs

(1,971)

(1,903)

(1,876)

(1,012)

Recoveries:

 

 

 

 

    Commercial, financial & agricultural

54 

29 

110 

110 

    Real estate – commercial

18 

51 

14 

    Real estate – construction

590 

167 

    Real estate – residential

20 

-- 

    Installment

-- 

        Total recoveries

689 

206 

167 

128 

Net (charge-offs) recoveries

(1,282)

(1,697)

(1,709)

(884)

Provision for credit losses

200 

600 

4,100 

3,500 

Balance end of period

$ 10,620 

$ 10,605 

$ 11,702 

$ 11,927 

 

 

 

 

 

Components:

 

 

 

 

    Allowance for loan losses

$ 10,090 

$ 10,157 

$ 10,976 

$ 11,177 

    Reserve for undisbursed lines of credit

530 

448 

726 

750 

Allowance for Credit Losses

$ 10,620 

$ 10,605 

$ 11,702 

$ 11,927 


The Allowance is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for undisbursed lines of credit. The Allowance is Management's estimate of the amount required to reflect the inherent losses in the loan portfolio, based on circumstances and conditions at each reporting date. Merchants reviews the adequacy of the Allowance at least quarterly. Factors considered in evaluating the adequacy of the Allowance include previous loss experience, current economic conditions and their effect on the borrowers, the performance of individual loans in relation to contract terms and estimated fair values of properties to be foreclosed. The method used in determining the amount of the Allowance is not based on maintaining a specific percentage of allowance for loan losses to total loans or total NPA. Rather, the methodology is a comprehensive analytical process of assessing the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio. This assessment incorporates a broad range of factors, which indicate both general and specific credit risk, as well as a consistent methodology for quantifying probable credit losses.


The level of the Allowance reflects Management’s current strategies and efforts to maintain the Allowance at a level adequate to provide for losses based on an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio, as well as the potential risk from unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. Among the factors that Management considers in establishing the level of the Allowance are overall findings from an analysis of individual loans, the overall risk characteristics and size of the loan portfolio, and past credit loss history. Additionally, Management assesses current economic and real estate market conditions and estimates of the current value of the underlying collateral. Loans placed in nonperforming status may be either assigned a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses or charged down to their estimated net realizable value based on Management’s assessment of the ultimate collectability of principal. To the extent Management determines the level of anticipated losses in the portfolio has increased or diminished, the allowance for loan losses is adjusted through current earnings. As part of Merchants’ analysis of specific credit risk, detailed and extensive reviews are performed on larger credits and problematic credits identified on the watched asset list, nonperforming asset listings and internal credit rating reports. An outside loan review firm examines portions of Merchants’ commercial loan portfolio two times per year. Over the course of the year, a minimum of 60% of commercial loan balances are reviewed, including all relationships over $1.00 million and criticized and classified loans over $500 thousand. Issues addressed by the loan review process include the accuracy of Merchants’ internal risk ratings system, loan quality, and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management considers the balance of the Allowance adequate at September 30, 2010.




27




Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


General

Merchants’ management and Board of Directors are committed to sound risk management practices throughout the organization. Merchants has developed and implemented a centralized risk management monitoring program. Risks associated with Merchants’ business activities and products are identified and measured as to probability of occurrence and impact on Merchants (low, moderate, or high), and the control or other activities in place to manage those risks are identified and assessed. Periodically, department-level and senior managers re-evaluate and report on the risk management processes for which they are responsible. This documented program provides Management with a comprehensive framework for monitoring Merchants’ risk profile from a macro perspective; it also serves as a tool for assessing internal controls over financial reporting as required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market rates or prices such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity prices. Merchants’ primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. An important component of Merchants’ asset and liability management process is the ongoing monitoring and management of this risk, which is governed by established policies that are reviewed and approved annually by Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors. The Investment policy details the types of securities that may be purchased, and establishes portfolio limits and maturity limits for the various sectors. The Investment policy also establishes specific investment quality limits. Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors has established a board level Asset and Liability Committee, which delegates responsibility for carrying out the asset/liability management policies to the management level ALCO. The ALCO, chaired by the Chief Financial Officer and composed of members of senior management, develops guidelines and strategies impacting Merchants’ asset and liability management related activities based upon estimated market risk sensitivity, policy limits and overall market interest rate levels and trends. The ALCO manages the investment portfolio. Merchants continued to work to maximize net interest income while mitigating risk during the first nine months of 2010 through repositioning of the investment portfolio, selective sales of specific securities, as well as carefully monitoring the overall duration and average life of the portfolio, and monitoring individual securities, among other strategies. Merchants has an outside investment advisory firm which helps it identify opportunities for increased yield, without significantly increasing risk, in the investment portfolio. The firm specializes in stable value and fixed income portfolios. The ALCO and the investment advisor have frequent conference calls to discuss portfolio activity and to set future strategy. Additionally, any specific bonds or sectors that require additional attention are discussed on these calls.


Merchants has been very active in its investment portfolio over the last twelve months as loan growth has slowed and deposit growth has increased. All investments purchased have been agency backed bullets, callables or mortgage product. Mortgage product has been priced at substantial premiums, creating additional interest rate risk. If rates fall further, or remain low for an extended period of time Merchants is subject to increased and/or sustained rapid prepayment risk which will cause accelerated premium amortization and negatively impact yields on premium paper. Merchants works with its investment advisor to evaluate mortgage product under a variety of interest rate scenarios to appropriately assess the impact on the yield of individual bonds.


Liquidity Risk

Merchants’ liquidity is measured by its ability to raise cash when needed at a reasonable cost. Merchants must be capable of meeting expected and unexpected obligations to customers at any time. Given the uncertain nature of customer demands as well as the need to maximize earnings, Merchants must have available reasonably priced sources of funds, on- and off-balance sheet, that can be accessed quickly in time of need. As discussed previously under “Liquidity and Capital Resource Management,” Merchants has several sources of readily available funds, including the ability to borrow using its investment portfolio as collateral. Merchants also monitors its liquidity on a quarterly basis in compliance with its Liquidity Contingency Plan.


During the past several quarters, the financial markets have been challenging for many financial institutions. As a result of these market conditions, liquidity premiums have widened and many banks have experienced liquidity constraints, and as a result have substantially increased pricing to retain deposit balances or utilized the FRB’s discount window to secure adequate funding. Because of Merchants’ favorable credit quality and strong balance sheet, Merchants has not experienced any liquidity constraints to date. During the past several quarters, Merchants’ liquidity position has grown, as depositors seek strong financial institutions.




28




Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the exposure to a movement in interest rates, which, as described above, affects Merchants’ net interest income. Asset and liability management is governed by policies reviewed and approved annually by Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors. The ALCO meets frequently to review and develop asset/liability management strategies and tactics.


The ALCO is responsible for evaluating and managing the interest rate risk which arises naturally from imbalances in repricing, maturity and cash flow characteristics of Merchants’ assets and liabilities. Techniques used by the ALCO take into consideration the cash flow and repricing attributes of balance sheet and off-balance sheet items and their relation to possible changes in interest rates. The ALCO manages interest rate exposure primarily by using on-balance sheet strategies, generally accomplished through the management of the duration, rate sensitivity and average lives of Merchants’ various investments, and by extending or shortening maturities of borrowed funds, as well as carefully managing and monitoring the pricing of loans and deposits. The ALCO also considers the use of off-balance sheet strategies, such as interest rate caps and floors and interest rate swaps, to help minimize Merchants’ exposure to changes in interest rates. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates Merchants exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes Merchants, which creates credit risk for Merchants. Merchants minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions only with high-quality counterparties. The market risk associated with interest rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.


The ALCO is responsible for ensuring that Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors receives accurate information regarding Merchants’ interest rate risk position at least quarterly. The ALCO uses an outside consultant to perform rate shocks of Merchants’ balance sheet, and to perform a variety of other analyses. The consultant’s most recent review was as of September 30, 2010. The consultant ran a base simulation assuming no changes in rates as well as a 200 basis point rising and, because rates are quite low, a 100 basis point falling interest rate scenario which assume a parallel and pro rata shift of the yield curve over a one-year period, and no growth assumptions. Additionally, the consultant ran a 400 basis point rising simulation which assumed a parallel shift of the curve over 24 months, and a 500 basis point rising simulation which assumed the curve flattened over a 24 month time frame. A summary of the results is as follows:


Current/Flat Rates: Net interest income is projected to trend downward in the current rate scenario as the expected replacement rates on assets are lower than the current portfolio, and opportunities to continue deposit rate reductions are limited.


Falling Rates: If rates fall, net interest income is projected to trend downward in line with the current rate scenario for the first five quarters as deposit rate reductions are offset by lower asset yields. The decrease in net interest income is more dramatic in year two as funding costs reach their implied floors and asset cash flow continues to reprice in the lower rate environment. Accelerated prepayment speeds on mortgage-based assets exacerbate the impact of lower rates.


Rising Rates: Net interest income levels are projected to trend downward over year one as immediate pressure on funding costs outpaces higher yields on the assets base. Thereafter, rising funding costs subside, and margins widen throughout the simulation as asset cash flow continues to be replaced into higher yields. The downward trend in net interest income is projected to extend out until year three if the yield curve should flatten as rates rise due to added pressure on the cost of funds. There will be increased risk to the flattening rate scenario if the deposit base is more volatile than assumed.


The change in net interest income for the next twelve months from Merchants’ expected or “most likely” forecast at the September 30, 2010 review is shown in the following table. The degree to which this exposure materializes will depend, in part, on Merchants’ ability to manage deposit rates as interest rates rise or fall.


Rate Change

Percent Change in
Net Interest Income

Up 200 basis points

0.5%

Down 100 basis points

0.8%


The ALCO uses off-balance sheet strategies, such as interest rate caps and floors and interest rate swaps, as well as borrowings with embedded caps and floors to help minimize Merchants’ exposure to changes in interest rates. As mentioned previously, Merchants entered into interest rate swap arrangements to fix the cost of its trust preferred issuance that switched to a floating interest rate in December 2009. Additionally, Merchants entered into borrowing arrangements secured by repurchase agreements totaling $54.00 million with embedded caps and floors that may provide additional protection as interest rates change.




29




The preceding sensitivity analysis does not represent Merchants’ forecast and should not be relied upon as indicative of expected operating results. These estimates are based upon numerous assumptions, including without limitation: the nature and timing of interest rate levels including yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit run-off rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits and reinvestment/replacement of asset and liability cash flows, among others. While assumptions are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, as well as historical behavior, Merchants cannot make any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.


The most significant factor affecting market risk exposure of net interest income is the current global economic recession and the U.S. Government’s response. Interest rates declined sharply during 2008 and have remained low through 2010 as the global economy slowed, unemployment levels increased, delinquencies on all types of loans increased along with decreased consumer confidence and declines in housing prices. Net interest income exposure is also significantly affected by the shape and level of the U.S. Government securities and interest rate swap yield curve, and changes in the size and composition of the loan, investment and deposit portfolios.


The model used to perform the balance sheet simulation assumes a parallel shift of the yield curve over twelve months and reprices every interest earning asset and interest bearing liability on Merchants’ balance sheet. The model uses contractual repricing dates for variable products, contractual maturities for fixed rate products, and product-specific assumptions for deposits such as Free Checking for LifeÒ accounts and money market accounts which are subject to repricing based on current market conditions. Investment securities with call provisions are examined on an individual basis in each rate environment to estimate the likelihood of a call. The model also assumes that the rate at which certain mortgage related assets prepay will vary as rates rise and fall, based on prepayment estimates published by Applied Financial Technologies.


As market conditions vary from those assumed in the sensitivity analysis, actual results will likely differ due to: the varying impact of changes in the balances and mix of loans and deposits differing from those assumed, the impact of possible off balance sheet hedging strategies, and other internal/external variables. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis does not reflect all actions that the ALCO might take in responding to or anticipating changes in interest rates.


Credit Risk

Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors reviews and approves Merchants Bank’s investment and loan policies on an annual basis. The investment policy establishes minimum investment quality guidelines, as well as specific limits on asset classes within the investment portfolio. Merchants Bank’s outside investment advisor tracks Non-Agency securities individually and presents at least quarterly updates on the performance of the underlying collateral. The loan policy establishes restrictions regarding the types of loans that may be granted, and the distribution of loan types within Merchants’ portfolio. Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors grants each loan officer the authority to originate loans on behalf of Merchants, subject to certain limitations. These authorized lending limits are reviewed at least annually and are based upon the officer’s knowledge and experience. Loan requests that exceed an officer’s authority require the signature of Merchants’ credit division manager, senior loan officer, and/or president. All extensions of credit of $4.0 million or greater to any one borrower or related party are reviewed and approved by the Loan Committee of Merchants Bank’s Board of Directors. Merchants’ loan portfolio is continuously monitored for performance, creditworthiness and strength of documentation through the use of a variety of management reports and with the assistance of an external loan review firm. Credit ratings are assigned to commercial loans and are routinely reviewed. Loan officers or the loan workout function take remedial actions to assure full and timely payment of loan balances when necessary.


Item 4.  Controls and Procedures


The principal executive officer, principal accounting officer, and other members of Merchants’ senior management have evaluated Merchants’ disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on this evaluation, Merchants’ principal executive officer and principal accounting officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures effectively ensure that information required to be disclosed in Merchants’ filings and submissions with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is accumulated and communicated to Merchants’ management (including the principal executive officer and principal accounting officer), and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC. In addition, Merchants has reviewed its internal control over financial reporting and there have been no changes in its internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.




30




MERCHANTS BANCSHARES, INC.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal Proceedings


None.


Item 1A. Risk Factors


Please read the factors discussed in Part I – Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2010, and the discussion contained in “Recent Market Developments” in this Form 10-Q, which could materially adversely affect Merchants’ business, financial condition and operating results. These risks are not the only ones facing Merchants. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to Merchants or that Merchants currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely effect Merchants’ business, financial condition and operating results.


Financial Regulatory Reform Legislation

On July 21, 2010, the President signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Act”), which comprehensively reforms the regulation of financial institutions, products and services. Among other things, the Act provides for new capital standards that eliminate the treatment of trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital. Existing trust preferred securities are grandfathered for banking entities with less than $15 billion of assets, such as Merchants. The Act permanently raises deposit insurance levels to $250,000, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and extends for two years the Transaction Account Guarantee Program, which will become mandatory for all insured depository institutions. Pursuant to modifications under the Act, deposit insurance assessments will be calculated based on an insured depository institution’s assets rather than its insured deposits and the minimum reserve ratio will be raised to 1.35%. The payment of interest on business demand deposit accounts is permitted by the Act. The Act authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to regulate interchange fees for debit card transactions and establishes new minimum mortgage underwriting standards for residential mortgages. The Act also establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (“CFPB”) as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board. The CFPB has the exclusive authority to prescribe rules governing the provision of consumer financial products and services.


The Act grants the SEC express authority to adopt rules granting proxy access for shareholder nominees, and grants shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and “golden parachute” payments. Pursuant to modifications of the proxy rules under the Act, Merchants will be required to disclose the relationship between executive pay and financial performance, the ratio of the median pay of all employees to the pay of the chief executive officer, and employee and director hedging activities. The Act also requires that stock exchanges change their listing rules to require that each member of a listed company’s compensation committee be independent and be granted the authority and funding to retain independent advisors and to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that does not adopt policies governing the claw back of excess executive compensation based on inaccurate financial statements.


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


None.


Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities


None.


Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]


Item 5. Other Information


None.




31




Item 6.  Exhibits


(a) Exhibits:


 

3.1.1

 

Certificate of Incorporation, filed April 20, 1987 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Merchants’ Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed on April 25, 1987 for Merchants’ Annual Meeting of Shareholders held June 2, 1987)

 

 

 

 

 

3.1.2

 

Certificate of Merger, filed June 5, 1987 (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

3.1.3

 

Certificate of Amendment, filed May 11, 1988 (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

3.1.4

 

Certificate of Amendment, filed April 29, 1991 (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

3.1.5

 

Certificate of Amendment, filed August 29, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

3.1.6

 

Certificate of Amendment, filed August 29, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007)

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Amended By-Laws of Merchants (Incorporated by reference to Merchants’ Form on 8-K, filed on
April 16, 2009)

 

 

 

 

 

31.1 *

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14

 

 

 

 

 

31.2 *

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14

 

 

 

 

 

32.1 *

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

32.2 *

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*Filed herewith




32




MERCHANTS BANCSHARES, INC.

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 

Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Michael R. Tuttle

 

Michael R. Tuttle
President & Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Janet P. Spitler

 

Janet P. Spitler
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
Principal Accounting Officer

 

 

 

November 5, 2010

 

Date





33