Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-31306
NOBLE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Cayman Islands
|
|
98-0366361 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer identification number) |
13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800, Sugar Land, Texas 77478
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (281) 276-6100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Ordinary Shares, Par Value $.10 Per Share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s ordinary shares held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $17.3 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange.
Number of Ordinary Shares outstanding as of February 15, 2009: 261,500,479
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Listed below are documents parts of which are incorporated herein by reference and the part of this
report into which the document is incorporated:
(1) The registrant has announced a transaction that, if completed, would result in a Swiss
company becoming a successor issuer to the registrant for purposes of Rule 12g-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting of
members of the registrant or, if the transaction described above is completed, the proxy
statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders of such successor issuer, which
meetings are in either case scheduled to be held in May 2009, will be incorporated by
reference into Part III.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (“Noble” or, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise, the “Company”, “we”,
“our” and words of similar import) is a leading offshore drilling contractor for the oil and gas
industry. We perform contract drilling services with our fleet of 63 mobile offshore drilling
units located worldwide. This fleet consists of 13 semisubmersibles, four dynamically positioned
drillships, 43 jackups and three submersibles. The fleet count includes five units under
construction, including one F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium jackup, one dynamically positioned,
ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship, and three deepwater dynamically
positioned semisubmersibles. We have secured customer contracts for the one jackup and three
semisubmersibles under construction. For additional information on the specifications of the
fleet, see “Item 2. Properties. — Drilling Fleet”. As of January 8, 2009, approximately 87 percent
of our fleet was deployed in areas outside of the United States, principally in the Middle East,
India, Mexico, the North Sea, Brazil, and West Africa.
Noble became the successor to Noble Drilling Corporation, a Delaware corporation (which we
sometimes refer to as “Noble Drilling”) that was organized in 1939, as part of the 2002 internal
corporate restructuring of Noble Drilling and its subsidiaries. Noble and its predecessors have
been engaged in the contract drilling of oil and gas wells since 1921.
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
In December 2008, we announced a proposed merger, reorganization and consolidation transaction
(the “Transaction”), which will restructure our corporate organization. The Transaction would
result in a new Swiss holding company, also called Noble Corporation (“Noble-Switzerland”), serving
as the publicly traded parent of the Noble group of companies. The Transaction would effectively
change the place of incorporation of the publicly traded parent company from the Cayman Islands to
Switzerland. We cannot assure you that the Transaction will be completed or, if it is, that we
will realize the benefits we anticipate from the Transaction. For further discussion of the
proposed Transaction, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations — Proposed Transaction.”
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our long-standing business strategy is the active expansion of our worldwide offshore drilling
and deepwater capabilities through acquisitions, upgrades and modifications, and the deployment of
drilling assets in important geological areas. We have also actively expanded our offshore
drilling and deepwater capabilities in recent years through the construction of new rigs. In 2008,
we continued our expansion strategy as indicated by the following developments and activities:
|
• |
|
we took delivery of our newbuild F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium independent leg
cantilevered jackup, the Noble Hans Deul, which is now operating under a long-term drilling
contract; |
|
|
• |
|
construction continued on one F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium independent leg cantilevered
jackups, the Noble Scott Marks, which is being constructed in China and is scheduled for
delivery in the second quarter of 2009; |
|
|
• |
|
construction continued on three newbuild ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles, the Noble
Danny Adkins, which is scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2009, and the Noble
Dave Beard and the Noble Jim Day, which are scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of
2009; and |
|
|
• |
|
we entered into agreements for the construction of a new, dynamically positioned,
ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship, which is scheduled to be
delivered in the second half of 2011. |
Newbuild capital expenditures totaled $800 million in 2008 for our rigs under construction
during the year.
2
We typically have not entered into a newbuild shipyard construction contract without a client
contract for the rig, although a number of our competitors have done so. At the end of 2008,
shipyards worldwide reportedly had received commitments to construct 74 jackups and 96 deepwater floaters, including our units.
These units are expected to be delivered between 2009 and 2012. The majority of these units
reportedly do not have a contractual commitment from a customer and are referred to in the offshore
drilling industry as “being built on speculation.” The introduction of non-contracted rigs into
the marketplace could have an adverse affect on the level of demand for our services or the
dayrates we are able to achieve. Our strategy on new construction has typically been to expand our
drilling fleet with technologically advanced units only in connection with a long-term drilling
contract that covers a substantial portion of our capital investment and provides an acceptable
return on our capital employed. Although we commenced construction of the Globetrotter without a
long-term drilling contract in place, we believe that a long-term contract will be achieved in the
near term because of the technologically innovative design of the drillship and the strength in the
deepwater market.
Many client contracts for newbuild rigs contain termination provisions for late delivery. The
drilling contracts for our newbuild rigs currently under construction similarly include provisions
that would allow our customers to terminate the contract for late delivery. The Noble Scott Marks,
currently scheduled to be completed during the second quarter of 2009, must be provided by
September 30, 2009 or our customer has the right to terminate the contract. The Noble Danny
Adkins, currently scheduled for completion during the third quarter of 2009, must be delivered from
the shipyard by July 30, 2009 or the customer has the right to terminate the contract. The
drilling contract for the Noble Jim Day, scheduled for completion in the fourth quarter of 2009,
contains a termination right in the event the rig is not ready to commence operations by December
31, 2010. The drilling contract for the Noble Dave Beard gives the customer the right to terminate
the contract if the rig did not commence operations by December 2008 and also gives the customer
the right to apply a penalty for delay beyond the date upon which it had the right to cancel. We
continue to discuss an extension for commencement and a reduction in penalty for this rig and
believe we will come to an accommodation with the client that is acceptable to us.
While we currently anticipate that our newbuild rigs will be completed and commissioned in a
timely manner, unforeseen events could result in delays. If there are delays in the construction
or commissioning of any or all of these rigs and our customers exercise their early termination
rights, we may not be able to secure a replacement contract on as favorable terms.
Our participation in the consolidation of the offshore drilling industry continues to be an
important element of our growth strategy. Consolidation typically takes one of two forms: an
individual transaction for specific mobile offshore drilling units or a transaction for an entire
company. From time to time, we evaluate other individual rig transactions and business
combinations with other parties, and we will continue to consider business opportunities that
promote our business strategy. Given the global economic downturn that began in mid-2008, it is
possible that some of our competitors’ rigs being built on speculation could become available for
purchase.
In recent years, the drilling industry has experienced significant increases in dayrates for
drilling services in most market segments, a tightening market for drilling equipment, and a
shortage of personnel. This environment has driven operating costs higher and magnified the
importance of recruiting, training and retaining skilled personnel. While the global financial
crisis has created an environment of uncertainty and downward pressure on certain types of costs,
in the short-term it may not have a material effect on many of our costs, even though we could see
a reduction in demand for our services.
In recognition of the importance of our offshore operations personnel in achieving a safety
record that has consistently outperformed the offshore drilling industry sector and to retain such
personnel, we have implemented a number of key operations personnel retention programs. We believe
these programs will complement our other short- and long-term incentive programs to attract and
retain the skilled personnel we need to maintain safe and efficient operations.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DURING 2008
In March 2008, we signed commitments for approximately $4.0 billion of contract backlog with
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. — PETROBRAS. The commitments are in the form of Memorandums of
Understanding on five deepwater rigs: Noble Paul Wolff, Noble Therald Martin, Noble Roger Eason,
Noble Leo Segerius and Noble Muravlenko. Upon execution of the definitive drilling contract, each
rig will be contracted for a period of five to six years. Additionally, we committed to perform a
reliability upgrade on each of our three drillships operating in Brazil, the Noble Roger Eason, the
Noble Leo Segerius and the Noble Muravlenko, at the start of each contract. The upgrades are
expected to cost approximately $175 million per rig and take approximately five months to complete.
During the five-month shipyard period, Petrobras has agreed to pay us $90,000 per day per rig.
In June 2008, we signed an agreement to extend the primary term of our newbuild
semisubmersible, the Noble Jim Day, from two years to four years. The dayrate during the term of
the contract is $515,000.
In September 2008, we signed contracts for the construction of a new, dynamically positioned,
ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship with South Korea’s STX Heavy
Industries Co., LTD (“STX”) and the Dutch-based design and construction firm Huisman Equipment B.V
(“Huisman”). The drillship will be built on a fixed-price basis in two phases. Following
construction of the hull and installation of the propulsion system by STX at their new
state-of-the-art facility in Dalian, China, the drillship will sail under its own power to the
Netherlands where Huisman will complete the installation and commissioning of the topside
equipment. The drillship will measure 620 feet long and 105 feet wide and will utilize Huisman’s
multi-purpose tower design with a drilling side and a pipe assembly side. The Globetrotter will be
capable of drilling to a vertical depth of 40,000 feet and will feature dynamic position
station-keeping ability, 18,000 tons of variable deck load, and quarters for 180 personnel. We
have options with STX and Huisman to construct up to three additional Globetrotter-class
drillships, two of which expire in early March 2009. We may decide to allow these, as well as the
third option, to expire at no cost to us under the contract, or we may seek to extend one or more of these options. We continue to
evaluate potential opportunities for these rigs, as well as opportunities to acquire existing rigs
already under construction.
3
In the third and fourth quarters of 2008, we were awarded bids with Petróleos Mexicanos
(“Pemex”) for two of our jackups, the Noble Roy Butler and the Noble Carl Norberg, which enabled us
to move these rigs to Mexico from West Africa, a market segment that saw little bidding activity
during 2008. The contract for the Noble Roy Butler is 433 days and the contract for the Noble Carl
Norberg is 731 days.
At December 31, 2008, our contracted backlog totaled approximately $11.5 billion with
approximately 79 percent of our available operating days committed for 2009, approximately 40
percent for 2010 and approximately 24 percent for 2011. These percentages take into account new
capacity added by our newbuild rigs that we anticipate commencing operations during the 2009
through 2011 period. See further discussion of our contract drilling backlog in “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
DRILLING CONTRACTS
We typically employ each drilling unit under an individual contract. Although the final terms
of the contracts result from negotiations with our customers, many contracts are awarded based upon
competitive bidding. Our drilling contracts generally contain the following terms:
|
• |
|
contract duration extending over a specific period of time or a period necessary to
drill one or more wells; |
|
|
• |
|
provisions permitting early termination of the contract by the customer (i) if the unit
is lost or destroyed or (ii) if operations are suspended for a specified period of time due
to either breakdown of equipment or “force majeure” events beyond our control and the
control of the customer; |
|
|
• |
|
options to extend the contract term, generally upon advance notice to us and usually
(but not always) at mutually agreed upon rates; |
|
|
• |
|
payment of compensation to us (generally in U.S. Dollars although some customers,
typically national oil companies, require a part of the compensation to be paid in local
currency) on a “daywork” basis, so that we receive a fixed amount for each day (“dayrate”)
that the drilling unit is operating under contract (a lower rate or no compensation is
payable during periods of equipment breakdown and repair or adverse weather or in the event
operations are interrupted by other conditions, some of which may be beyond our control); |
|
|
• |
|
payment by us of the operating expenses of the drilling unit, including labor costs and
the cost of incidental supplies; and |
|
|
• |
|
provisions that allow us to recover certain cost increases from certain of our
customers. |
The terms of some of our drilling contracts permit early termination of the contract by the
customer, without cause, generally exercisable upon advance notice to us and in some cases upon the
making of an early termination payment to us. Our drilling contracts with Pemex in Mexico, for
example, allow early cancellation on 30 days or less notice to us without Pemex making an early
termination payment.
Generally, our contracts allow us to recover our mobilization and demobilization costs
associated with moving a drilling unit from one regional location to another. When market
conditions require us to bear these costs, our operating margins are reduced accordingly. We
cannot predict our ability to recover these costs in the future. For shorter moves such as “field
moves”, our customers have generally agreed to bear the costs of moving the unit by paying us a
reduced dayrate or “move rate” while the unit is being moved.
During times of depressed market conditions, our customers may seek to avoid or reduce their
obligations to us under term drilling contracts or letter agreements or letters of intent for
drilling contracts. A customer may no longer need a rig due to a reduction in its exploration,
development or production program, or it may seek to obtain a comparable rig at a lower dayrate.
4
OFFSHORE DRILLING OPERATIONS
Contract Drilling Services
We conduct offshore contract drilling operations, which accounted for approximately 98
percent, 93 percent and 93 percent of operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. We conduct our contract drilling operations principally in the Middle
East, India, U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, the North Sea, Brazil, and West Africa. Pemex accounted
for approximately 20 percent, 15 percent and 12 percent of our total operating revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No other single customer accounted for
more than 10 percent of our total operating revenues in 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Labor Contracts
We perform services under labor contracts for drilling and workover activities covering two
rigs under a labor contract (the “Hibernia Contract”) off the east coast of Canada. We do not own
or lease these rigs.
Under our labor contracts, we provide the personnel necessary to manage and perform the
drilling operations from drilling platforms owned by the operator. The Hibernia Contract extends
through January 2013.
During the second quarter of 2008, we sold our North Sea labor contract drilling services
business to Seawell Holding UK Limited (“Seawell”) for $35 million plus working capital. This sale
included labor contracts covering 11 platform operations in the United Kingdom sector of the North
Sea. In connection with this sale, we recognized a gain of $36 million, net of closing costs. This
gain includes approximately $5 million in cumulative currency translation adjustments.
Additionally, we operated the jackup Noble Kolskaya through a bareboat charter that was to
expire by its terms in July 2008. During the second quarter of 2008, the drilling contract for the
Noble Kolskaya was terminated early, and we returned the rig to its owner.
COMPETITION
The offshore contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business
characterized by high capital and maintenance costs. Some of our competitors may have access to
greater financial resources than we do.
In the provision of contract drilling services, competition involves numerous factors,
including price, rig availability and suitability, experience of the workforce, efficiency, safety
performance record, condition of equipment, operating integrity, reputation, industry standing and
client relations. We believe that we compete favorably with respect to all of these factors. We
follow a policy of keeping our equipment well maintained and technologically competitive. However,
our equipment could be made obsolete by the development of new techniques and equipment.
We compete on a worldwide basis, but competition may vary significantly by region at any
particular time. Demand for offshore drilling equipment also depends on the exploration and
development programs of oil and gas producers, which in turn are influenced by the financial
condition of such producers, by general economic conditions and prices of oil and gas, and by
political considerations and policies.
In addition, industry-wide shortages of supplies, services, skilled personnel and equipment
necessary to conduct our business can occur. We cannot assure that any such shortages experienced
in the past would not happen again or that any shortages, to the extent currently existing, will
not continue or worsen in the future.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Political developments and numerous governmental regulations, which may relate directly or
indirectly to the contract drilling industry, affect many aspects of our operations. Non-U.S.
contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we
operate, including laws and regulations relating to the equipping and operation of drilling units,
currency conversions and repatriation, oil and gas exploration and development, taxation of
offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel and use of local employees and suppliers by
foreign contractors. A number of countries actively regulate
5
and control the ownership of
concessions and companies holding concessions, the exportation of oil and gas and other aspects of the oil and
gas industries in their countries. In addition, government action, including initiatives by the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”), may continue to contribute to oil price
volatility. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil companies and their need for drilling
services and may continue to do so.
The regulations applicable to our operations include provisions that regulate the discharge of
materials into the environment or require remediation of contamination under certain circumstances.
The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”) and regulations thereunder impose certain additional
operational requirements on our offshore rigs operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and govern
liability for leaks, spills and blowouts involving pollutants. Regulations under OPA 90 require
owners and operators of rigs in United States waters to maintain certain levels of financial
responsibility. Many of the other countries in whose waters we operate from time to time also
regulate the discharge of oil and other contaminants in connection with drilling operations. We
have made and will continue to make expenditures to comply with environmental requirements. To
date we have not expended material amounts in order to comply, and we do not believe that our
compliance with such requirements will have a material adverse effect upon our results of
operations or competitive position or materially increase our capital expenditures. Although these
requirements impact the energy and energy services industries, generally they do not appear to
affect us in any material respect that is different, or to any materially greater or lesser extent,
than other companies in the energy services industry.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2008, we had approximately 6,000 employees, including employees engaged
through labor contractors or agencies. Approximately 81 percent of our employees were engaged in
operations outside of the U.S. and approximately 19 percent were engaged in U.S. operations. We
are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements that are material, and we consider our
employee relations to be satisfactory.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Information regarding our revenues from external customers, segment profit or loss and total
assets attributable to each segment for the last three fiscal years is presented in Note 15 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information regarding our operating revenues and identifiable assets attributable to each of
our geographic areas of operations for the last three fiscal years is presented in Note 15 to our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge at our internet website at
http://www.noblecorp.com. These filings are also available to the public at the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington,
DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Electronic filings with the SEC are also available on the SEC
internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
You may also find information related to our corporate governance, board committees and
company code of ethics at our website. Among the information you can find there is the following:
|
• |
|
Corporate Governance Guidelines; |
|
|
• |
|
Audit Committee Charter; |
|
|
• |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter; |
|
|
• |
|
Executive Compensation Committee Charter; and |
|
|
• |
|
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. |
6
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Each of these risk factors could affect our business,
operating results and financial condition, as well as affect an investment in our shares.
In addition, you should consider the risk factors relating to our proposed Transaction that
would restructure our corporate organization to result in a new Swiss holding company serving as
the publicly traded parent of the Noble group of companies. We cannot assure you that the
Transaction will be completed or, if it is, that we will realize the benefits we anticipate from
the Transaction. The risk factors relating to the proposed Transaction are described under “Risk
Factors” in our definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 11, 2009, which section
is incorporated by reference herein.
Our business depends on the level of activity in the oil and gas industry, which is
significantly affected by volatile oil and gas prices.
Demand for drilling services depends on a variety of economic and political factors and the
level of activity in offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production markets
worldwide. Commodity prices, and market expectations of potential changes in these prices, may
significantly affect this level of activity. However, higher prices do not necessarily translate
into increased drilling activity since our clients’ expectations of future commodity prices
typically drive demand for our rigs. Oil and gas prices are extremely volatile and are affected by
numerous factors beyond our control, including:
|
• |
|
the political environment of oil-producing regions, including uncertainty or instability
resulting from an outbreak or escalation of armed hostilities or acts of war or terrorism; |
|
|
• |
|
worldwide demand for oil and gas, which is impacted by changes in the rate of economic
growth in the U.S. and other non-U.S. economies; |
|
|
• |
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and
maintain production levels and pricing; |
|
|
• |
|
the level of production in non-OPEC countries; |
|
|
• |
|
the policies and regulations of the various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
• |
|
the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas; |
|
|
• |
|
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
• |
|
the rate of decline of existing and new oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
• |
|
available pipeline and other oil and gas transportation capacity; |
|
|
• |
|
the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital; |
|
|
• |
|
adverse weather conditions (such as hurricanes and monsoons) and seas; |
|
|
• |
|
the development and exploitation of alternative fuels; |
|
|
• |
|
tax policy; and |
|
|
• |
|
advances in exploration, development and production technology. |
Demand for our drilling services may decrease due to events beyond our control.
Our business could be impacted by events beyond our control including changes in our
customers’ drilling programs or budgets or their liquidity (including access to capital), changes
in, or prolonged reductions of, prices for oil and gas, or shifts in the relative strength of
various geographic drilling markets brought on by economic slowdown, or regional or worldwide
recession, any of which could result in deterioration in demand for our drilling services. In
addition, our customers may cancel drilling contracts or letter agreements or letters of intent for
drilling contracts, or exercise early termination rights found in some of our drilling contracts or
available under local law, for a variety of reasons, many of which are beyond our control.
Depending upon market conditions, our customers may also seek renegotiation of firm drilling
contracts to reduce their obligations. If the future level of demand for our drilling services or if future conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry decline,
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
7
In addition, we have a number of contracts that will expire in 2009 and 2010. Our ability to
renew these contracts or obtain new contracts and the terms of any such contracts will depend on
market conditions and the condition of our customers. We may be unable to renew our expiring
contracts or obtain new contracts for the rigs under contracts that have expired or been
terminated, and the dayrates under any new contracts may be below, perhaps substantially below, the
existing dayrates, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash
flows.
The contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business with intense
price competition. If we are not able to compete successfully, our profitability may be reduced.
The offshore contract drilling industry is a highly competitive and cyclical business
characterized by high capital and maintenance costs. Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded
on a competitive bid basis. Intense price competition, rig availability, location and suitability,
experience of the workforce, efficiency, safety performance record, technical capability and
condition of equipment, operating integrity, reputation, industry standing and client relations are
all factors in determining which contractor is awarded a job. Mergers among oil and natural gas
exploration and production companies from time to time may reduce the number of available clients,
resulting in increased price competition.
Our industry has historically been cyclical. There have been periods of high demand, short
rig supply and high dayrates, followed by periods of lower demand, excess rig supply and low
dayrates. Periods of excess rig supply intensify the competition in the industry and may result in
some of our rigs being idle for long periods of time. Prolonged periods of low utilization and low
dayrates could result in the recognition of impairment charges on certain of our drilling rigs if
future cash flow estimates, based upon information available to management at the time, indicate
that the carrying value of these rigs may not be recoverable.
The increase in supply created by the number of rigs being built, as well as changes in our
competitors’ drilling rig fleets, could intensify price competition and require higher capital
investment to keep our rigs competitive. In addition, the supply attributable to newbuild rigs,
especially those being built on speculation, could cause a reduction in future dayrates. In
certain markets, for example, we are experiencing competition from newbuild jackups that are
scheduled to enter the market in 2009 and beyond. The entry of these newbuild jackups into the
market may result in lower marketplace dayrates for jackups. Similarly, there are a number of
deepwater newbuilds that are scheduled to enter the market over the next several years, which could
also adversely affect the dayrates for these units.
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis could lead to an extended worldwide economic
recession and have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and
credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The
shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent substantial losses in worldwide equity
markets has led to a recession in the United States, Europe and Japan and could lead to an extended
worldwide economic recession. A slowdown in economic activity caused by a worldwide recession,
combined with lower prices for oil and gas, would likely reduce worldwide demand for energy and
demand for drilling services. If demand for drilling services declines, we could experience a
decline in dayrates for new contracts and a slowing in the pace of new contract activity. Crude
oil prices declined significantly in the second half of 2008 and forecasted crude oil prices for
the remainder of 2009 are not expected to return to prior levels. Demand for our services depends
on oil and natural gas industry activity and expenditure levels that are directly affected by
trends in oil and natural gas prices. Demand for our services is particularly sensitive to the
level of exploration, development, and production activity of, and the corresponding capital
spending by, oil and natural gas companies. Any prolonged reduction in oil and natural gas prices
or material impairment of our customers’ cash flow or liquidity, including their access to capital,
could result in lower levels of exploration, development and production activity. Lower levels of
exploration activity could result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our drilling
services, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. The financial crisis may also adversely affect the ability of shipyards
to meet scheduled deliveries of our newbuilds and our ability to renew our fleet through new vessel
construction projects and conversion projects.
8
The global financial and credit crisis may have impacts on our liquidity and financial
condition that we currently cannot predict.
The global financial and credit crisis and related instability in the global financial system
may impact our liquidity and financial condition, and we may face significant challenges if
conditions in the financial markets do not improve. Banks and other lenders have suffered
significant losses and have implemented stricter standards for lending, which has contributed to a
general restriction on the availability of credit. It may be difficult or more expensive for us to
access the capital markets or borrow money at a time when we would like, or need, to access
capital, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to react to changing economic and
business conditions, and to fund our operations and capital expenditures and to make acquisitions.
The credit crisis could also impact our lenders and customers, causing them to fail to meet their
obligations to us. While there can be no assurance that the current financial crisis will improve
and its impact on our future liquidity and financial condition cannot be predicted, we will
continue to monitor it.
Construction, conversion or upgrades of rigs are subject to risks, including delays and cost
overruns, which could have an adverse impact on our available cash resources and results of
operations.
We currently have significant new construction projects and conversion projects underway and
we may undertake additional such projects in the future. In addition, we make significant upgrade,
refurbishment and repair expenditures for our fleet from time to time, particularly as our rigs
become older. Some of these expenditures are unplanned. These projects and other efforts of this
type are subject to risks of cost overruns or delays inherent in any large construction project as
a result of numerous factors, including the following:
|
• |
|
shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor; |
|
|
• |
|
work stoppages and labor disputes; |
|
|
• |
|
unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment; |
|
|
• |
|
local customs strikes or related work slowdowns that could delay importation of
equipment or materials; |
|
|
• |
|
weather interferences; |
|
|
• |
|
difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or approvals or in meeting permit or
approval conditions; |
|
|
• |
|
design and engineering problems; |
|
|
• |
|
latent damages or deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery in excess of
engineering estimates and assumptions; |
|
|
• |
|
unforeseen increases in the cost of equipment, labor and raw materials, particularly
steel; |
|
|
• |
|
unanticipated actual or purported change orders; |
|
|
• |
|
client acceptance delays; |
|
|
• |
|
disputes with shipyards and suppliers; |
|
|
• |
|
delays in, or inability to obtain, access to funding; |
|
|
• |
|
shipyard failures and difficulties, including as a result of financial problems of
shipyards or their subcontractors; and |
|
|
• |
|
failure or delay of third-party equipment vendors or service providers. |
Failure to complete a rig upgrade or new construction on time, or the inability to complete a
rig conversion or new construction in accordance with its design specifications, may, in some
circumstances, result in loss of revenues, penalties, or delay, renegotiation or cancellation of a
drilling contract. For example, drilling contracts for our newbuild rigs currently under construction include
provisions that would allow our customers to terminate the contract if we experience construction
or commissioning delays. Any unforeseen delays, many of which are beyond our control, could result
in delays in delivery of these rigs to our customers. In the event of termination of one of these contracts, we may not be able to
secure a replacement contract on as favorable terms. Additionally, capital expenditures for rig
upgrade, refurbishment and construction projects could materially exceed our planned capital
expenditures. Moreover, our rigs undergoing upgrade, refurbishment and repair may not earn a
dayrate during the period they are out of service.
We are subject to changes in tax laws.
We are a Cayman Islands company and operate through various subsidiaries in numerous countries
throughout the world including the United States. Consequently, we are subject to changes in tax
laws, treaties or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof in the U.S., the Cayman
Islands or jurisdictions in which we or any of our subsidiaries operate or are resident.
9
In 2004, the U.S. Congress enacted legislation as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (the “AJCA”) that tightened the rules regarding corporate inversion transactions, which
legislation grandfathered companies that implemented an inversion transaction before March 4, 2003.
Noble’s corporate inversion effected on April 30, 2002 was therefore grandfathered. Nevertheless,
there has been activity in the U.S. Congress subsequent to the AJCA to enact legislation that would
retroactively reverse the status of Noble under the law or otherwise cause us to be treated as a
U.S. corporation. Congress may approve future tax legislation relating to Noble’s corporate
inversion or otherwise affecting our status as a foreign corporation. Any such legislation could
contain provisions that would subject Noble to U.S. Federal income tax as if Noble were a U.S.
corporation. Payment of any such tax would reduce our net income. Legislation has also been
proposed in Congress that would deny us the benefits under U.S. tax treaties with respect to
certain intercompany transactions. We cannot predict what legislation, if any, relating to our
corporate inversion, our status as a foreign corporation, or our eligibility for benefits under tax
treaties may result from any future Congressional legislative activities.
Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, we
are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which we
operate, including treaties between the United States and other nations. Our income tax expense is
based upon our interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the
expense was incurred. If these laws, treaties or regulations change or if the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service or other taxing authorities do not agree with our assessment of the effects of such laws,
treaties and regulations, this could have a material adverse effect on us, including the imposition
of a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings or a reclassification of the tax impact of
our significant corporate restructuring transactions.
We could be adversely affected by violations of applicable anti-corruption laws.
We operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a
reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable
anti-corruption laws and our code of business conduct and ethics. We are subject, however, to the
risk that we, our affiliated entities or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents
may take action determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the U.S.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (“FCPA”). Any such violation could result in substantial
fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain
jurisdictions and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial
condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do
business. Further, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is
expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management. For a
discussion of an ongoing internal investigation relating to our operations in Nigeria, see “Part
II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -
Internal Investigation”.
Failure to attract and retain highly skilled personnel or an increase in personnel costs could
hurt our operations.
We require highly skilled personnel to operate and provide technical services and support for
our drilling units. As the demand for drilling services and the size of the worldwide industry
fleet has increased, shortages of qualified personnel have occurred from time to time. These
shortages could result in our loss of qualified personnel to competitors, impair our ability to
attract and retain qualified personnel for our new or existing drilling units, impair the
timeliness and quality of our work and create upward pressure on personnel costs, any of which
could adversely affect our operations.
We may have difficulty obtaining or maintaining insurance in the future and we cannot fully
insure against all of the risks and hazards we face.
No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain insurance against all risks or that
we will be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates and with
deductibles or retention amounts that we consider commercially reasonable.
10
Following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005, the insurance industry offered reduced coverage
for U.S. Gulf of Mexico named windstorm perils at significantly higher premiums designed to recover
hurricane-related underwriting losses in an accelerated manner, particularly for companies that
have an exposure in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The damage sustained to offshore oil and gas assets as a result of Hurricane Ike in 2008
has caused the insurance market for U.S. named windstorm perils to deteriorate even further. Our
units deployed in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico include five semisubmersibles and three submersibles (two
contracted submersibles and one cold stacked submersible). We have not yet concluded the March
2009 renewal of our insurance program, but we believe that coverage terms will be more restrictive
and premium pricing much higher for U.S. named windstorm perils as compared to our expiring
insurance program. Accordingly, we may decide to self insure
U.S. named windstorm perils until such time the
insurance market can once again offer terms and pricing that are acceptable to us. If we self insure U.S. named windstorm perils, such self insurance would not apply
to our units in the Mexican portion of the Gulf of Mexico. We also
expect to assume generally higher deductibles for our other insurance
coverage. If one or more future significant
weather-related events occur in the Gulf of Mexico, or in any other geographic area in which we
operate, we may experience further increases in insurance costs, additional coverage restrictions
or unavailability of certain insurance products.
Although we maintain insurance in the geographic areas in which we operate, pollution,
reservoir damage and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Our insurance policies
and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover our losses or may have exclusions of
coverage for some losses. We do not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all risks,
including loss of hire insurance on most of the rigs in our fleet. Uninsured exposures may include
war risk, activities prohibited by U.S. laws and regulations, radiation hazards, certain loss or
damage to property onboard our rigs and losses relating to terrorist acts or strikes. If a
significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or contractual
indemnity, it could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Additionally, there can be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to
indemnify us will necessarily be financially able to indemnify us against all these risks.
Our business involves numerous operating hazards.
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the drilling business, including
blowouts, cratering, fires and collisions or groundings of offshore equipment, and damage or loss
from adverse weather and seas. These hazards could cause personal injury or loss of life, suspend
drilling operations or seriously damage or destroy the property and equipment involved, result in
claims by employees, customers or third parties and, in addition to causing environmental damage,
could cause substantial damage to oil and natural gas producing formations or facilities.
Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal drilling conditions, and
failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services, or personnel shortages. Damage
to the environment could also result from our operations, particularly through oil spillage or
extensive uncontrolled fires. We may also be subject to damage claims by oil and gas companies.
Governmental laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, may add to
our costs or limit our drilling activity.
Our business is affected by public policy and laws and regulations relating to the energy
industry and the environment in the geographic areas where we operate.
The drilling industry is dependent on demand for services from the oil and gas exploration and
production industry, and accordingly, we are directly affected by the adoption of laws and
regulations that for economic, environmental or other policy reasons curtail exploration and
development drilling for oil and gas. We may be required to make significant capital expenditures
to comply with governmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that these laws and
regulations may in the future add significantly to our operating costs or significantly limit
drilling activity. Governments in some foreign countries are increasingly active in regulating and
controlling the ownership of concessions, the exploration for oil and gas, and other aspects of the
oil and gas industries. The modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new
laws or regulations curtailing exploratory or developmental drilling for oil and gas for economic,
environmental or other reasons could materially and adversely affect our operations by limiting
drilling opportunities or imposing materially increased costs.
Our operations are also subject to numerous laws and regulations controlling the discharge of
materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. As a
result, the application of these laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations by increasing our cost of doing business, discouraging our customers from drilling for
hydrocarbons or subjecting us to liability. For example, we, as an operator of mobile offshore
drilling units in navigable U.S. waters and certain offshore areas, including the U.S. Outer
Continental Shelf, are liable for damages and for the
11
cost of removing oil spills for which we may
be held responsible, subject to certain limitations. Our operations may involve the use or handling
of materials that are classified as environmentally hazardous. Laws and regulations protecting the
environment have generally become more stringent and in certain circumstances impose “strict
liability,” rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or
fault. Environmental laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of or
conditions caused by others or for acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the
time they were performed.
Our non-U.S. operations involve additional risks not associated with U.S. Gulf of Mexico
operations.
We operate in various regions throughout the world that may expose us to political and other
uncertainties, including risks of:
|
• |
|
terrorist acts, war and civil disturbances; |
|
|
• |
|
seizure, nationalization or expropriation of property or equipment; |
|
|
• |
|
foreign and U.S. monetary policy and foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations; |
|
|
• |
|
the inability to repatriate income or capital; |
|
|
• |
|
complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment in remote locations; |
|
|
• |
|
piracy; |
|
|
• |
|
import-export quotas, wage and price controls, imposition of trade barriers and other
forms of government regulation and economic conditions that are beyond our control; |
|
|
• |
|
regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign bureaucratic actions; and |
|
|
• |
|
changing taxation policies. |
Our operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate,
including laws and regulations relating to:
|
• |
|
the importing, exporting, equipping and operation of drilling units; |
|
|
• |
|
repatriation of foreign earnings; |
|
|
• |
|
currency exchange controls; |
|
|
• |
|
oil and gas exploration and development; |
|
|
• |
|
taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel; and |
|
|
• |
|
use and compensation of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors. |
Our ability to do business in a number of jurisdictions is subject to maintaining required
licenses and permits and complying with applicable laws and regulations. We have historically
operated our drilling units offshore Nigeria under temporary import permits. The permits covering
the two units currently operating in Nigeria expired in November 2008 and we have pending
applications to renew these permits. However, as of February 25, 2009, the Nigerian customs office
had not acted upon our applications. We may not be able to obtain these extensions or replacement
permits. Even if we are able to obtain these extensions, we may not be able to obtain further
extensions or new temporary import permits necessary to continue uninterrupted operations in
Nigerian waters for the duration of the units’ drilling contracts. We cannot predict what impact
these events may have on any such contract or our business in Nigeria. We cannot predict what
changes, if any, relating to temporary import permit policies and procedures may be established or
implemented in Nigeria in the future, or how such changes may impact our business there. For
additional information regarding our ongoing internal investigation of our Nigerian operations and
the status of our temporary import permits in Nigeria, see “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Internal Investigation.” Changes
in, compliance with, or our failure to comply with the laws and regulations of the countries where
we operate, including Nigeria, may negatively impact our operations in those countries and could
have a material adverse affect on our results of operations.
We have been advised by the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (“NIMASA”) that
it is seeking to collect a two percent surcharge on contract amounts under contracts performed by
“vessels”, within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws, engaged in the Nigerian coastal shipping
trade. We have also been informed that NIMASA has recently filed suit
against us in the Federal High Court of Nigeria seeking collection of
this surcharge. We do not believe that our offshore drilling units are engaged in the Nigerian coastal
shipping trade nor that our units are “vessels” within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws. We
are taking legal action to resist the application of Nigeria’s cabotage laws to our drilling units,
although the outcome of any such legal action and the extent to which we may ultimately be
responsible for the surcharge is uncertain. We may be required to pay the surcharge and comply
with other aspects of the Nigerian cabotage laws, which could
adversely effect our operations in Nigerian waters and
require us to incur additional costs of compliance. For additional information regarding this
action, see “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 12 — Commitments
and Contingencies”.
12
Governmental action, including initiatives by OPEC, may continue to cause oil price
volatility. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the
amount of exploration and development work done by major oil companies, which may continue. In
addition, some foreign governments favor or effectively require the awarding of drilling contracts
to local contractors, require use of a local agent or require foreign contractors to employ
citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may adversely
affect our ability to compete and our results of operations.
Fluctuations in exchange rates and nonconvertibility of currencies could result in losses to us.
Due to our non-U.S. operations, we may experience currency exchange losses where revenues are
received or expenses are paid in nonconvertible currencies or where we do not hedge an exposure to
a foreign currency. We may also incur losses as a result of an inability to collect revenues
because of a shortage of convertible currency available to the country of operation, controls over
currency exchange or controls over the repatriation of income or capital.
We are subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect on us.
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. These matters may include,
among other things, contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings,
asbestos and other toxic tort claims, employment matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties,
and other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. Although we intend to
defend these matters vigorously, we cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any
claim or other litigation matter, and there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any
litigation. Litigation may have an adverse effect on us because of potential negative outcomes,
costs of attorneys, the allocation of management’s time and attention, and other factors.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section
27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this
report regarding our financial position, business strategy, plans and objectives of management for
future operations, industry conditions, and indebtedness covenant compliance are forward-looking
statements. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,”
“intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to be among the
statements that identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. We have identified factors that could cause actual
plans or results to differ materially from those included in any forward-looking statements. These
factors include those described in “Risk Factors” above, or in our other SEC filings, among others.
Such risks and uncertainties are beyond our ability to control, and in many cases, we cannot
predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those indicated by the forward-looking statements. You should consider these risks when you are
evaluating us.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
13
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
DRILLING FLEET
Our offshore fleet is composed of the following types of units: semisubmersibles, dynamically
positioned drillships, independent leg cantilevered jackups and submersibles. Each type is
described further below. Several factors determine the type of unit most suitable for a particular
job, the most significant of which include the water depth and ocean floor conditions at the
proposed drilling location, whether the drilling is being done over a platform or other structure,
and the intended well depth.
Semisubmersibles
Our semisubmersible fleet consists of 13 units, including:
|
• |
|
five units that have been converted to Noble EVA-4000™ semisubmersibles; |
|
|
• |
|
three Friede & Goldman 9500 Enhanced Pacesetter semisubmersibles (including the Noble
Dave Beard, which is currently under construction); |
|
|
• |
|
two Pentagone 85 semisubmersibles; |
|
|
• |
|
two Bingo 9000 design units (the Noble Danny Adkins and the Noble Jim Day, both of which
are under construction); and |
|
|
• |
|
one semisubmersible capable of operating in harsh environments. |
Semisubmersibles are floating platforms which, by means of a water ballasting system, can be
submerged to a predetermined depth so that a substantial portion of the hull is below the water
surface during drilling operations. These units maintain their position over the well through the
use of either a fixed mooring system or a computer controlled dynamic positioning system and can
drill in many areas where jackups can drill. However, semisubmersibles normally require water
depth of at least 200 feet in order to conduct operations. Our semisubmersibles are capable of
drilling in water depths of up to 12,000 feet, depending on the unit. Semisubmersibles are more
expensive to construct and operate than jackups.
Dynamically Positioned Drillships
We have four dynamically positioned drillships in the fleet, including our dynamically
positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship under construction.
Drillships are ships that are equipped for drilling and are typically self-propelled. Our units
are positioned over the well through the use of a computer- controlled dynamic positioning system.
Two drillships, the Noble Leo Segerius and the Noble Roger Eason, are capable of drilling in water
depths up to 5,600 feet and 7,200 feet, respectively. The Noble Muravlenko, in which we own an 82
percent interest through a joint venture, is capable of drilling in water depths up to 4,900 feet.
In addition, in September 2008 we signed contracts for the construction of a new, dynamically
positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship as described under
“Item 1. Business – Business Developments During 2008.” That description is incorporated herein by
reference. The Globetrotter-class drillship will be capable of drilling in water depths up to
10,000 feet.
14
Independent Leg Cantilevered Jackups
We have 43 jackups in the fleet, including the Noble Scott Marks which is currently under
construction and the recently completed Noble Hans Deul. Jackups are mobile, self-elevating
drilling platforms equipped with legs that can be lowered to the ocean floor until a foundation is
established for support. The rig hull includes the drilling rig, jacking system, crew quarters,
loading and unloading facilities, storage areas for bulk and liquid materials, helicopter landing
deck and other related equipment. All of our jackups are independent leg (i.e., the legs can be
raised or lowered independently of each other) and cantilevered. A cantilevered jackup has a
feature that permits the drilling platform to be extended out from the hull, allowing it to perform
drilling or workover operations over pre-existing platforms or structures. Moving a rig to the
drill site involves jacking up its legs until the hull is floating on the surface of the water.
The hull is then towed to the drill site by tugs and the legs are jacked down to the ocean floor.
The jacking operation continues until the hull is raised out of the water, and drilling operations
are conducted with the hull in its raised position. Our jackups are capable of drilling to a
maximum depth of 30,000 feet in water depths ranging between eight and 400 feet, depending on the
jackup.
Submersibles
We have three submersibles in the fleet. Submersibles are mobile drilling platforms that are
towed to the drill site and submerged to drilling position by flooding the lower hull until it
rests on the sea floor, with the upper deck above the water surface. Our submersibles are capable
of drilling to a maximum depth of 25,000 feet in water depths ranging between 12 and 70 feet,
depending on the submersible.
15
Drilling Fleet Table
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our offshore fleet at January 8,
2009. The table does not include any units owned by operators for which we had labor contracts.
We operate and, unless otherwise indicated, own all of the units included in the table.
Drilling Fleet Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depth |
|
|
Depth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Built |
|
Rating |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Make |
|
or Rebuilt (1) |
|
(feet) |
|
|
(feet) |
|
|
Location |
|
Status (2) |
Semisubmersibles - 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Paul Wolff |
|
Noble EVA-4000™ - DP |
|
2006 R |
|
|
9,200 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
Active |
Noble Paul Romano |
|
Noble EVA-4000™ |
|
1998R/2007M |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Amos Runner |
|
Noble EVA-4000™ |
|
1999R/2008M |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Jim Thompson |
|
Noble EVA-4000™ |
|
1999R/2006M |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Max Smith |
|
Noble EVA-4000™ |
|
1999 R |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Homer Ferrington |
|
F&G 9500 Enhanced Pacesetter |
|
2004 R |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Cote d’Ivorie |
|
Active |
Noble Lorris Bouzigard |
|
Pentagone 85 |
|
2003 R |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Therald Martin |
|
Pentagone 85 |
|
2004 R |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
Active |
Noble Ton van Langeveld (3) |
|
Offshore Co. SCP III Mark 2 |
|
2000 R |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
Active |
Noble Clyde Boudreaux |
|
F&G 9500 Enhanced Pacesetter |
|
2007 R/M |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Dave Beard |
|
F&G 9500 Enhanced Pacesetter - DP |
|
2008 N |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
China |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
Noble Danny Adkins |
|
Bingo 9000 - DP |
|
2009 N |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Singapore |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
Noble Jim Day |
|
Bingo 9000 - DP |
|
2009 N |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Singapore |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamically Positioned Drillships - 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Roger Eason |
|
NAM Nedlloyd - C |
|
2005 R |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
Noble Leo Segerius |
|
Gusto Engineering Pelican Class |
|
2002 R |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
Active |
Noble Muravlenko (4) |
|
Gusto Engineering Pelican Class |
|
1997 R |
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
Active |
Globetrotter (3) |
|
Globetrotter Class |
|
2011 N |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
China |
|
Shipyard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Leg Cantilevered Jackups - 43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Bill Jennings |
|
MLT Class 84 - E.R.C. |
|
1997 R |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Eddie Paul |
|
MLT Class 84 - E.R.C. |
|
1995 R |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Leonard Jones |
|
MLT Class 53 - E.R.C. |
|
1998 R |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Julie Robertson (3) (5) |
|
Baker Marine Europe Class |
|
2001 R |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
Active |
Noble Al White (3) |
|
CFEM T-2005-C |
|
2005 R |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Active |
Noble Johnnie Hoffman |
|
Baker Marine BMC 300 |
|
1993 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Byron Welliver (3) |
|
CFEM T-2005-C |
|
1982 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Denmark |
|
Active |
Noble Roy Butler (6) |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
1998 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Tommy Craighead |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
2003 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
Active |
Noble Kenneth Delaney |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
1998 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Percy Johns |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
1995 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
Active |
Noble George McLeod |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
1995 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
India |
|
Active |
Noble Jimmy Puckett |
|
F&G L-780 MOD II |
|
2002 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Gus Androes |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
2004 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Active |
Noble Lewis Dugger |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
1997 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Ed Holt |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
2003 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
India |
|
Active |
Noble Sam Noble |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
1982 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Gene Rosser |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
1996 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble John Sandifer |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
1995 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Harvey Duhaney |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
2001 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Mark Burns |
|
Levingston Class 111-C |
|
2005 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Active |
Noble Cees van Diemen |
|
Modec 300C-38 |
|
2004 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
Noble David Tinsley |
|
Modec 300C-38 |
|
2004 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Gene House |
|
Modec 300C-38 |
|
1998 R |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Charlie Yester |
|
MLT Class 116-C |
|
1980 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
India |
|
Active |
Noble Roy Rhodes (6) |
|
MLT Class 116-C |
|
1979 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Active |
Noble Charles Copeland (7) |
|
MLT Class 82-SD-C |
|
2001 R |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Earl Frederickson |
|
MLT Class 82-SD-C |
|
1999 R |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Tom Jobe |
|
MLT Class 82-SD-C |
|
1982 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Ed Noble |
|
MLT Class 82-SD-C |
|
2003 R |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
Active |
Noble Lloyd Noble |
|
MLT Class 82-SD-C |
|
1990 R |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Nigeria |
|
Active |
Noble Carl Norberg |
|
MLT Class 82-C |
|
2003 R |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Chuck Syring |
|
MLT Class 82-C |
|
1996 R |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble George Sauvageau (3) |
|
NAM Nedlloyd-C |
|
1981 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Active |
Noble Ronald Hoope (3) |
|
MSC/CJ-46 |
|
1982 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.K. |
|
Active |
Noble Lynda Bossler (3) |
|
MSC/CJ-46 |
|
1982 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Active |
Noble Piet van Ede (3) |
|
MSC/CJ-46 |
|
1982 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
Active |
Noble Dick Favor |
|
Baker Marine BMC 150 |
|
2004 R |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Shipyard |
Noble Don Walker |
|
Baker Marine BMC 150-SD |
|
1992 R |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
Benin |
|
Active |
Dhabi II |
|
Baker Marine BMC 150 |
|
2006 R |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
U.A.E. |
|
Active |
Noble Roger Lewis (3) (8) |
|
F&G JU-2000E |
|
2007 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Qatar |
|
Active |
Noble Hans Deul (3) |
|
F&G JU-2000E |
|
2008 |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
U.K |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
Noble Scott Marks (3) |
|
F&G JU-2000E |
|
2009 N |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
China |
|
Shipyard/Contracted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submersibles - 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble Joe Alford |
|
Pace Marine 85G |
|
2006 R |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Lester Pettus |
|
Pace Marine 85G |
|
2007 R |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Active |
Noble Fri Rodli |
|
Transworld |
|
1998 R |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
U.S. Gulf of Mexico |
|
Cold Stacked |
See footnotes on the following page.
16
Footnotes to Drilling Fleet Table
1. |
|
Rigs designated with an “R” were modified, refurbished or otherwise upgraded
in the year indicated by capital expenditures in an amount deemed material by
management. Rigs designated with an “N” are newbuilds. Rigs designated with an “M”
have been upgraded to the Noble NC-5SM mooring standard. |
|
2. |
|
Rigs listed as “active” were operating under contract as of January 8, 2009;
rigs listed as “contracted” have signed contracts or have letters of intent with
operators but have not begun operations; rigs listed as “shipyard” are in a shipyard
for construction, repair, refurbishment or upgrade; rigs listed as “stacked” are
idle without a contract. |
|
3. |
|
Harsh environment capability. |
|
4. |
|
We operate the unit and own an 82 percent interest in the unit through a joint
venture. |
|
5. |
|
Although designed for a water depth rating of 390 feet of water in a non-harsh
environment, the rig is currently equipped with legs adequate to drill in
approximately 200 feet of water in a harsh environment. We own the additional leg
sections required to extend the drilling depth capability to 390 feet of water. |
|
6. |
|
Although designed for a water depth rating of 300 feet of water, the rig is
currently equipped with legs adequate to drill in approximately 250 feet of water.
We own the additional leg sections required to extend the drilling depth capability
to 300 feet of water. |
|
7. |
|
Although designed for a water depth rating of 280 feet of water, the rig is
currently equipped with legs adequate to drill in approximately 250 feet of water.
We own the additional leg sections required to extend the water depth capability to
280 feet of water. |
|
8. |
|
Although designed for a water depth rating of 400 feet of water, the rig is
currently equipped with legs adequate to drill in approximately 225 feet of water.
We own the additional leg sections required to extend the drilling depth capability
to 400 feet of water. |
17
FACILITIES
Our principal executive offices are located in Sugar Land, Texas, and are leased through June
2011. We also lease administrative and marketing offices, and sites used primarily for storage,
maintenance and repairs, and research and development for drilling rigs and equipment, in Baar,
Switzerland; Sugar Land, Texas; New Orleans and Lafitte, Louisiana; Leduc, Alberta and St. John’s,
Newfoundland, Canada; Lagos and Port Harcourt, Nigeria; Ivory Coast; Equatorial Guinea; Mexico City
and Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico; Doha, Qatar; Abu Dhabi and Dubai, U.A.E.; Beverwijk and Den Helder,
The Netherlands; Norfolk, England; Macae and Rio de Janiero, Brazil; Dalian, China; Jurong,
Singapore; and Esjberg, Denmark. We own certain tracts of land, including office and
administrative buildings and warehouse facilities, in Bayou Black, Louisiana and Aberdeen,
Scotland.
For a description of the Transaction and our consideration of a possible relocation of our
principal executive offices, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations — Proposed Transaction.”
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 12 to our consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES. |
Market for Ordinary Shares and Related Member Information
Our ordinary shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
“NE”. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices and
dividends declared and paid per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Declared and Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
42.96 |
|
|
$ |
20.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
65.78 |
|
|
|
41.27 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
67.98 |
|
|
|
50.49 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
First quarter |
|
|
57.01 |
|
|
|
42.11 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
57.64 |
|
|
$ |
46.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
54.29 |
|
|
|
43.48 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
49.52 |
|
|
|
39.19 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
First quarter |
|
|
40.78 |
|
|
|
33.81 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
The declaration and payment of dividends, or distributions of capital, in the future are at
the discretion of our Board of Directors or, in the event the Transaction is completed, our
shareholders, and the amount of any future dividends will depend on our results of operations,
financial condition, cash requirements, future business prospects, contractual restrictions and
other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
On
February 15, 2009, there were 261,500,479 of our ordinary shares
outstanding held by 1,777 member accounts of record.
18
If the Transaction is completed, we expect the shares of the new Swiss holding company, also
named “Noble Corporation”, to be listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NE”. See
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Proposed
Transaction.”
Purchases of Ordinary Shares
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain information about ordinary
shares that we purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2008 |
|
|
463 |
(2) |
|
$ |
38.22 |
(2) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,339,891 |
|
November 2008 |
|
|
151,124 |
(3) |
|
|
33.54 |
(3) |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
20,239,891 |
|
December 2008 |
|
|
1,900,336 |
(4) |
|
|
21.16 |
(4) |
|
|
1,900,000 |
|
|
|
18,339,891 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All share purchases were made in the open market pursuant to our share repurchase program
that our Board of Directors authorized and adopted and we announced on January 31, 2002. Our
share repurchase program has no date of expiration. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 463 ordinary shares at an average price of $38.22 per share surrendered to us by
employees for withholding taxes payable upon the vesting of restricted stock. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 51,124 ordinary shares at an average price of $40.61 per share surrendered to us by
employees for withholding taxes payable upon the vesting of restricted stock. The 100,000
shares repurchased pursuant to our share repurchase program were purchased at an average price
of $29.92 per share. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 336 ordinary shares at an average price of $23.84 per share surrendered to us by
employees for withholding taxes payable upon the vesting of restricted stock. The 1,900,000
shares repurchased pursuant to our share repurchase program were purchased at an average price
of $21.16 per share. |
19
Stock Performance Graph
This graph shows the cumulative total shareholder return of our ordinary shares over the
five-year period from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008. The graph also shows the cumulative
total returns for the same five-year period of the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Oil
Equipment & Services Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested in our ordinary shares and
the two indices on December 31, 2003 and that all dividends were reinvested on the date of payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDEXED RETURNS |
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31, |
|
Company Name / Index |
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Noble Corporation |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
139.02 |
|
|
$ |
197.45 |
|
|
$ |
213.64 |
|
|
$ |
317.89 |
|
|
$ |
126.39 |
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
110.88 |
|
|
|
116.33 |
|
|
|
134.70 |
|
|
|
142.10 |
|
|
|
89.53 |
|
Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
135.40 |
|
|
|
205.46 |
|
|
|
233.14 |
|
|
|
337.92 |
|
|
|
137.55 |
|
Investors
are cautioned against drawing any conclusions from the data contained
in the graph, as past results are not necessarily indicative of
future performance.
The above graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be
“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future
filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except
to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.
20
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth selected financial data of us and our consolidated subsidiaries
over the five-year period ended December 31, 2008, which information is derived from our audited
financial statements. This information should be read in connection with, and is qualified in its
entirety by, the more detailed information in our financial statements included in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
3,446,501 |
|
|
$ |
2,995,311 |
|
|
$ |
2,100,239 |
|
|
$ |
1,382,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,066,231 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1,560,995 |
|
|
|
1,206,011 |
|
|
|
731,866 |
|
|
|
296,696 |
|
|
|
146,086 |
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and marketable securities |
|
$ |
513,311 |
|
|
$ |
161,058 |
|
|
$ |
61,710 |
|
|
$ |
166,302 |
|
|
$ |
191,578 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
5,642,549 |
|
|
|
4,795,916 |
|
|
|
3,858,393 |
|
|
|
2,999,019 |
|
|
|
2,743,620 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,102,331 |
|
|
|
5,876,006 |
|
|
|
4,585,914 |
|
|
|
4,346,367 |
|
|
|
3,307,973 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
750,789 |
|
|
|
774,182 |
|
|
|
684,469 |
|
|
|
1,129,325 |
|
|
|
503,288 |
|
Total debt (1) |
|
|
923,487 |
|
|
|
784,516 |
|
|
|
694,098 |
|
|
|
1,138,297 |
|
|
|
511,649 |
|
Shareholders’ equity |
|
|
5,290,715 |
|
|
|
4,308,322 |
|
|
|
3,228,993 |
|
|
|
2,731,734 |
|
|
|
2,384,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
$ |
1,888,192 |
|
|
$ |
1,414,373 |
|
|
$ |
988,715 |
|
|
$ |
529,010 |
|
|
$ |
332,221 |
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(1,129,293 |
) |
|
|
(1,223,873 |
) |
|
|
(349,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,147,411 |
) |
|
|
(297,423 |
) |
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
(406,646 |
) |
|
|
(91,152 |
) |
|
|
(698,940 |
) |
|
|
681,456 |
|
|
|
(38,575 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,231,321 |
|
|
|
1,287,043 |
|
|
|
1,122,061 |
|
|
|
545,095 |
|
|
|
333,989 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
561,348 |
|
|
|
367,419 |
|
|
|
143,720 |
|
|
|
263,120 |
|
|
|
211,117 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share (2) |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of Long-Term Debt and Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt. |
|
(2) |
|
In October 2004, our Board of Directors modified our then existing dividend policy and
instituted a new policy in the first quarter of 2005 for the payment of a quarterly cash
dividend. The cash dividend declared in 2008 includes a special dividend of $0.75 per share. |
21
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our financial position at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and our results of operations for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008. You should read the accompanying consolidated financial statements
and related notes in conjunction with this discussion.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Our 2008 financial and operating results include:
|
• |
|
operating revenues totaling $3.4 billion; |
|
|
• |
|
net income of $1.6 billion or $5.85 per diluted share; |
|
|
• |
|
net cash from operating activities totaling $1.9 billion; |
|
|
• |
|
an increase in our average dayrate across our worldwide fleet to $174,506 from $139,948
in 2007; |
|
|
• |
|
a decrease in debt to 14.9 percent of total capitalization at the end of 2008, down from
15.4 percent at the end of 2007. |
The global financial crisis created an environment of uncertainty during late 2008 that has
continued into 2009, and it has raised concerns that the worldwide economy may enter into a
prolonged recession. Deterioration in the worldwide economy could result in reduced demand for oil
and gas exploration and production activity and, therefore, reduce demand for offshore drilling
services. The financial crisis has created significant reductions in available credit and other
sources of capital, which may restrict our ability to fund our operations and capital expenditures
and adversely impact our customers’ and lenders’ ability to fulfill their obligations to us. Other
possible negative impacts include a decline in dayrates under new contracts, an increase in early
termination of or defaults under existing contracts and a slowing in the pace of new contract
activity.
Demand for our drilling services generally depends on a variety of economic and political
factors, including worldwide demand for oil and gas, the ability of the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and pricing, the level of
production of non-OPEC countries and the policies of various governments regarding exploration and
development of their oil and gas reserves. Our results of operations depend on activity in the oil
and gas production and development markets worldwide. Historically, oil and gas prices and market
expectations of potential changes in these prices have significantly affected that level of
activity. Generally, higher oil and natural gas prices or our customers’ expectations of higher
prices result in a greater demand for our services and lower oil and gas prices result in reduced
demand for our services. Oil and gas prices are extremely volatile and have declined sharply since
mid-2008.
Demand for our services is also a function of the worldwide supply of mobile offshore drilling
units. Industry sources report that a total of 74 newbuild jackups and 96 deepwater newbuilds are
scheduled to enter service worldwide between 2009 and 2012. The majority of these units reportedly
do not have a contractual commitment from a customer and are referred to in the offshore drilling
industry as “being built on speculation”. The introduction of non-contracted rigs into the
marketplace could have an adverse affect on the level of demand for our services or the dayrates we
are able to achieve.
We cannot predict the future level of demand for our drilling services or future conditions in
the offshore contract drilling industry. Decreases in commodity prices or the level of demand for
our drilling services or increases in the supply of drilling rigs in the market could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations.
We continued to face significant cost pressure in 2008 as a result of increases in labor costs
and prices for materials and services that are essential to our operations. Daily operating costs
increased to $53,528 per day in 2008 from $45,375 per day in 2007. Given the current high demand
for personnel and equipment, we expect to see continued upward pressure on operating costs in 2009.
22
Our long-standing business strategy is the active expansion of our worldwide offshore drilling
and deepwater capabilities through acquisitions, upgrades and modifications, and the deployment of
drilling assets in important geological areas. Since the beginning of 2001, we have added seven
jackups, two deepwater semisubmersibles, and two ultra-deepwater semisubmersible baredeck hulls, both of which are now
being completed into rigs, to our worldwide fleet through acquisitions. We have also actively
expanded our offshore drilling and deepwater capabilities in recent years through the construction
of new rigs. In 2008, we continued our expansion strategy as indicated by the following
developments and activities:
|
• |
|
we took delivery of our newbuild F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium independent leg
cantilevered jackup, the Noble Hans Deul, which is now operating under a long-term drilling
contract; |
|
|
• |
|
construction continued on one F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium independent leg cantilevered
jackups, the Noble Scott Marks, which is being constructed in China and is scheduled for
delivery in the second quarter of 2009; |
|
|
• |
|
construction continued on three newbuild ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles, the Noble
Danny Adkins, which is scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2009, and the Noble
Dave Beard and the Noble Jim Day, which are scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of
2009; and |
|
|
• |
|
we entered into agreements for the construction of a new, dynamically positioned,
ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship, which is scheduled to be
delivered in the second half of 2011. We are continuing to evaluate the possibility of
exercising options to construct up to three additional Globetrotter-class drillships. |
Newbuild capital expenditures totaled $800 million in 2008 for our rigs under construction
during the year.
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
In December 2008, we announced a proposed merger, reorganization and consolidation transaction
(the “Transaction”), which, if completed, will restructure our corporate organization. The
Transaction would result in a new Swiss holding company serving as the publicly traded parent of
the Noble group of companies. The Transaction would effectively change the place of incorporation
of the publicly traded parent company from the Cayman Islands to Switzerland.
The Transaction will involve several steps. First, we have formed a new Swiss corporation
registered in the Canton of Zug, Switzerland named Noble Corporation (“Noble-Switzerland”) as a
direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Noble Corporation, the Cayman Islands company that is the
current ultimate parent company (“Noble-Cayman”). Noble-Switzerland, in turn, has formed a new
Cayman Islands subsidiary named Noble Cayman Acquisition Ltd. (“merger sub”). We have set a
meeting of members on March 17, 2009 to approve the Transaction, and, assuming we have obtained the
necessary member approval, we plan to have a subsequent hearing of the Grand Court of the Cayman
Islands on March 26, 2009 to approve the Transaction. If the requisite member and court approvals
are obtained, we expect to close the Transaction promptly following the court approval.
In connection with the Transaction, merger sub will merge with Noble-Cayman, with Noble-Cayman
as the surviving company. As a result of the Transaction, merger sub will be dissolved and will
cease to exist and Noble-Cayman will become a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Noble-Switzerland,
the resulting publicly traded parent of the Noble group. In the Transaction, all of the
outstanding ordinary shares of Noble-Cayman will be cancelled, and Noble-Switzerland will issue,
through an exchange agent, one share of Noble-Switzerland in exchange for each share of
Noble-Cayman, plus an additional 15 million shares of Noble-Switzerland to Noble-Cayman, which may
in turn subsequently transfer these shares to one or more other subsidiaries of Noble-Switzerland
for future use to satisfy our obligation to deliver these shares in connection with awards granted
under our employee benefits plans and other general corporate purposes. We expect the
Noble-Switzerland shares to be listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
“NE”, the same symbol under which our shares are currently listed and traded.
We have not concluded whether we will relocate our principal executive offices from Sugar
Land, Texas. However, we are continuing to analyze this issue and we may relocate such offices
either before or after the consummation of the Transaction if we believe it would be in the best
interests of Noble and our shareholders.
We currently believe that the Transaction should have no material impact on how we conduct our
day-to-day operations. Where we conduct our future operations will depend on a variety of factors,
independent of our legal domicile, including the worldwide demand for our services and the overall
needs of our business.
23
CONTRACT DRILLING SERVICES BACKLOG
We maintain a backlog (as defined below) of commitments for contract drilling services. The
following table sets forth as of December 31, 2008 the amount of our contract drilling services
backlog and the percent of available operating days committed for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013-2016 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contract Drilling Services Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semisubmersibles/Drillships (1) |
|
$ |
8,894,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,794,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,016,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,695,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,222,000 |
|
Jackups/Submersibles (2) |
|
|
2,646,000 |
|
|
|
1,887,000 |
|
|
|
577,000 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3)(4) |
|
$ |
11,540,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,681,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,593,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,877,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,222,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Available |
|
Operating Days Committed (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our drilling contracts with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”) provide an opportunity for
us to earn performance bonuses based on downtime experienced for our rigs operating offshore
Brazil. With respect to our semisubmersibles operating offshore Brazil, we have included in
our backlog an amount equal to 75 percent of potential performance bonuses for such
semisubmersibles, which amount is based on and generally consistent with our historical
earnings of performance bonuses for these rigs. With respect to our drillships operating
offshore Brazil, we (a) have not included in our backlog any performance bonuses for periods
prior to the commencement of certain upgrade projects planned for 2010 and 2011, which
projects are designed to enhance the reliability and operational performance of our
drillships, and (b) have included in our backlog an amount equal to 75 percent of potential
performance bonuses for periods after the estimated completion of such upgrade projects. Our
backlog for semisubmersibles/drillships includes approximately $335 million attributable to
these performance bonuses. |
|
(2) |
|
Our drilling contracts with Pemex Exploracion y Produccion (“Pemex”) for certain jackups
operating offshore in Mexico are subject to price review and adjustment of the rig dayrate.
Presently, contracts for five jackups have dayrates indexed to the world average of the
highest dayrates published by ODS-Petrodata. After an initial firm dayrate period, the
dayrates are generally adjusted quarterly based on formulas calculated from the index. Our
contract drilling services backlog has been calculated using the December 31, 2008 index-based
dayrates for periods subsequent to the initial firm dayrate period. |
|
(3) |
|
Pemex has the ability to cancel its drilling contracts on 30 days or less notice without
Pemex’s making an early termination payment. We currently have 13 rigs contracted to Pemex in
Mexico, and our backlog includes approximately $1.5 billion related to such contracts at
December 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
The Noble Scott Marks must be provided by September 30, 2009 or our customer has the right to
terminate the contract. The Noble Danny Adkins must be delivered from the shipyard by July
30, 2009 or the customer has the right to terminate the contract. The drilling contract for
the Noble Jim Day contains a termination right in the event the rig is not ready to commence
operations by December 31, 2010. The drilling contract for the Noble Dave Beard gives the
customer the right to terminate the contract if the rig did not commence operations by
December 2008 and also gives the customer the right to apply a penalty for delay beyond the
date upon which it had the right to cancel. We continue to discuss an extension for
commencement and a reduction in penalty for this rig and believe we will come to an
accommodation with the client that is acceptable to us. |
|
(5) |
|
Percentages take into account additional capacity from the estimated dates of deployment of
our newbuild rigs that are scheduled to commence operations during 2009 through 2011. |
Our contract drilling services backlog consists of commitments we believe to be firm. Our
contract drilling services backlog reported above reflects estimated future revenues attributable
to both signed drilling contracts and letters of intent. A letter of intent is generally subject
to customary conditions, including the execution of a definitive drilling contract. If worldwide
economic conditions continue to deteriorate, it is possible that some customers that have entered
into letters of intent will not enter into signed drilling contracts. We calculate backlog for any
given unit and period by multiplying the full contractual operating dayrate for such unit by the
number of days remaining in the period. The reported contract drilling services backlog does not
include amounts representing revenues for mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation,
which are not expected to be significant to our contract drilling services revenues, reimbursable
amounts from customers or amounts attributable to uncommitted option periods under drilling
contracts or letters of intent.
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods during which revenues are earned
may differ from the backlog amounts and backlog periods set forth in the table above due to various
factors, including, but not limited to, shipyard and maintenance projects, unplanned downtime,
weather conditions and other factors that result in applicable dayrates lower than the full
contractual operating dayrate. In addition, amounts included in the backlog may change because
drilling contracts may be varied or modified by mutual consent or customers may exercise early
termination rights or decline to enter into a drilling contract after executing a letter of intent.
As a result, our backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of our actual operating
results for the subsequent periods for which the backlog is calculated.
24
INTERNAL INVESTIGATION
In June 2007, we announced that we were conducting an internal investigation of our Nigerian
operations, focusing on the legality under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as
amended (the “FCPA”), and local laws of our Nigerian affiliate’s reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by our customs agents in connection with obtaining and renewing permits for the temporary
importation of drilling units and related equipment into Nigerian waters, including permits that
are necessary for our drilling units to operate in Nigerian waters. We also announced that the
audit committee of our Board of Directors had engaged a leading law firm with significant
experience in investigating and advising on FCPA matters to lead the investigation as independent
outside counsel. The scope of the investigation also includes our dealings with customs agents and
customs authorities in certain parts of the world other than Nigeria in which we conduct our
operations, as well as dealings with other types of local agents in Nigeria and such other parts of
the world. There can be no assurance that evidence of additional potential FCPA violations may not
be uncovered through the investigation.
The audit committee commissioned the internal investigation after our management brought to
the attention of the audit committee a news release issued by another company. The news release
disclosed that the other company was conducting an internal investigation into the FCPA
implications of certain actions by a customs agent in Nigeria in connection with the temporary
importation of that company’s vessels into Nigeria. Our drilling units that conduct operations in
Nigeria do so under temporary import permits, and management considered it prudent to review our
own practices in this regard.
We voluntarily contacted the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to advise them
that an independent investigation was underway. We have been cooperating, and intend to continue
to cooperate fully with both agencies. If the SEC or the DOJ determines that violations of the
FCPA have occurred, they could seek civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties,
against us and/or certain of our employees, as well as additional changes to our business practices
and compliance programs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business or
financial condition. In addition, such actions, whether actual or alleged, could damage our
reputation and ability to do business, to attract and retain employees, and to access capital
markets. Further, detecting, investigating, and resolving such actions is expensive and consumes
significant time and attention of our senior management.
The independent outside counsel appointed by the audit committee to perform the internal
investigation made a presentation of the results of its investigation to the DOJ and the SEC in
June 2008. The SEC and the DOJ have begun to review these results and information gathered by the
independent outside counsel in the course of the investigation. Neither the SEC nor the DOJ has
indicated what action it may take, if any, against us or any individual, or whether it may request
that the audit committee’s independent outside counsel conduct further investigation. Therefore,
we consider the internal investigation to be ongoing and cannot predict when it will conclude.
Furthermore, we cannot predict whether either the SEC or the DOJ will open its own proceeding to
investigate this matter, or if a proceeding is opened, what potential remedies these agencies may
seek. We could also face fines or sanctions in relevant foreign jurisdictions. Based on
information obtained to date in our internal investigation, we have not determined that any
potential liability that may result is probable or remote or can be reasonably estimated. As a
result, we have not made any accrual in our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2008.
We are currently operating two jackup rigs offshore Nigeria. The temporary import permits
covering the rigs expired in November 2008 and we have pending applications to renew these permits.
However, as of February 25, 2009, the Nigerian customs office had not acted on our applications.
We continue to seek to avoid material disruption to our Nigerian operations; however, there can be
no assurance that we will be able to obtain new permits or further extensions of permits necessary
to continue the operation of our rigs in Nigeria. If we cannot obtain a new permit or an extension
necessary to continue operations of any rig, we may need to cease operations under the drilling
contract for such rig and relocate such rig from Nigerian waters. In any case, we also could be
subject to actions by Nigerian customs for import duties and fines for these two rigs, as well as
other drilling rigs that operated in Nigeria in the past. We cannot predict what impact these
events may have on any such contract or our business in Nigeria. Furthermore, we cannot predict
what changes, if any, relating to temporary import permit policies and procedures may be
established or implemented in Nigeria in the future, or how any such changes may impact our
business there.
25
Notwithstanding that the internal investigation is ongoing, we concluded that certain changes
to our FCPA compliance program would provide us greater assurance that our assets are not used,
directly or indirectly, to make improper payments, including customs payments, and that we are in
compliance with the FCPA’s record-keeping requirements. Although we have had a long-standing
published policy requiring compliance with the FCPA and broadly prohibiting any improper payments
by us to foreign or U.S. officials, we adopted additional measures intended to enhance FCPA
compliance procedures. Further measures may be required once the investigation concludes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2008 Compared to 2007
General
Net income for 2008 was $1.6 billion, or $5.85 per diluted share, on operating revenues of
$3.4 billion, compared to net income for 2007 of $1.2 billion, or $4.48 per diluted share, on
operating revenues of $3.0 billion.
Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment
are dependent on three primary metrics — rig utilization, operating days and dayrates. The
following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our
rig fleet for 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Rig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization(1) |
|
|
Operating Days(2) |
|
|
Average Dayrates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Jackups |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
13,879 |
|
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
$ |
148,532 |
|
|
$ |
120,229 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Semisubmersibles
>6,000’(3) |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
327,558 |
|
|
|
274,613 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Semisubmersibles
<6,000’(4) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
220,475 |
|
|
|
177,790 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Drillships |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
-25 |
% |
|
|
201,819 |
|
|
|
119,669 |
|
|
|
69 |
% |
Submersibles |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
-9 |
% |
|
|
54,106 |
|
|
|
74,171 |
|
|
|
-27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
18,904 |
|
|
|
19,395 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
$ |
174,506 |
|
|
$ |
139,948 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet,
excluding newbuild rigs under construction. |
|
(2) |
|
Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.
|
|
(3) |
|
These units have water depth ratings of 6,000 feet or greater. |
|
(4) |
|
These units have water depth ratings of less than 6,000 feet. |
26
Contract Drilling Services
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for
our contract drilling services segment for 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
3,298,850 |
|
|
$ |
2,714,250 |
|
|
$ |
584,600 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
76,099 |
|
|
|
83,944 |
|
|
|
(7,845 |
) |
|
|
-9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,376,224 |
|
|
$ |
2,799,520 |
|
|
$ |
576,704 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
1,011,882 |
|
|
$ |
880,049 |
|
|
$ |
131,833 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
65,251 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
349,448 |
|
|
|
283,225 |
|
|
|
66,223 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
72,381 |
|
|
|
83,695 |
|
|
|
(11,314 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Hurricane losses and (recoveries), net |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
13,514 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,508,962 |
|
|
|
1,314,419 |
|
|
|
194,543 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
1,867,262 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,101 |
|
|
$ |
382,161 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Not a meaningful percentage
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues and the
related direct costs as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables do
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
Operating Revenues. Contract drilling services revenue increases for 2008 as compared to 2007
were primarily driven by increases in average dayrates. Average dayrates increased revenues
approximately $670 million for 2008, while fewer operating days reduced revenues approximately $86
million.
Average dayrates increased 25 percent in 2008 as compared to 2007. Except for our submersible
rigs, which were impacted by weakening demand in the shallow waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico,
higher average dayrates were received across all rig categories as strong demand for drilling rigs
drove market dayrates higher. Demand in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico has been weakened due to decreases
in natural gas prices and increases in operating costs compared to on-shore drilling.
The decrease in operating days in 2008 as compared to 2007 was primarily due to an increase in
downtime of certain rigs in 2008. Unpaid shipyard days increased 417 days in 2008 as compared to
2007, as the Noble Roy Butler and the Noble George McLeod each spent significant time in the
shipyard during 2008 for rig modifications and regulatory inspections, and the Noble Roger Eason is
currently completing repairs for fire damage suffered in November 2007. Additionally, the Noble
Fri Rodli, the Noble Don Walker, the Noble Roy Butler and the Noble Carl Norberg spent an aggregate
total of 852 days stacked during 2008. The Noble Fri Rodli has been cold-stacked since October
2007 due to weakening demand in the shallow waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The Noble Don
Walker, the Noble Roy Butler and the Noble Carl Norberg spent time stacked in 2008 due to weakness
in the Nigerian market. The Noble Carl Norberg and the Noble Roy Butler are currently under
contract in Mexico, and the Noble Don Walker is operating under a contract off the West African
coast of Benin. The aggregate number of stacked days in 2007 was 255 days. These decreases in
operating days were partially offset by increased operating days of 471 days for three recently
completed newbuilds, the ultra-deepwater semisubmersible the Noble Clyde Boudreaux and the enhanced
premium jackups the Noble Roger Lewis and the Noble Hans Deul, which were added to the fleet in
June 2007, September 2007 and November 2008, respectively. Additionally, 2008 had one more
available operating day than 2007 due to leap year, which added 54 more operating days in 2008.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Contract drilling services expenses increased 15 percent in
2008 as compared to 2007. Our recently completed newbuild rigs, including the Noble Clyde
Boudreaux, the Noble Roger Lewis and the Noble Hans Deul, added $45 million of operating costs in
2008 as compared to 2007. Excluding the effect of these rigs, our labor costs increased $42
million in 2008 over 2007 due to higher compensation, including retention programs designed to
retain key rig and operations personnel. The remaining $45 million of the operating cost increase
in 2008 over 2007 was primarily due to increases in costs of daily rig operations, including a $19
million increase in maintenance expenses, an $11 million increase in crew rotation and
transportation costs and to a lesser extent, increases in catering, fuel, rig communications and
safety and training costs.
27
Depreciation and amortization increased $66 million in 2008 over 2007 due to depreciation on
newbuilds added to the fleet, and additional depreciation related to other capital expenditures on
our fleet since the beginning of 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $11 million in 2008 from 2007 primarily
due to a $6 million decrease in severance costs related to executive departures, a $3 million
reduction in compensation expense on our Restoration Plan mark-to-market adjustment and a $2
million decrease in costs incurred in the internal investigation of our Nigerian operations.
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net for 2008 relate to a charge of $10 million, which
represents our deductible under our insurance program, for certain of our rigs operating in the
U.S. Gulf of Mexico that sustained damage as a result of Hurricane Ike. All damaged rigs have
subsequently returned to work. During 2007, we recognized a net recovery of $4 million on the
final settlement of all remaining physical damage and loss of hire insurance claims for damage
caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005.
Other
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for
our other services for 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Operating Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
$ |
55,078 |
|
|
$ |
156,508 |
|
|
$ |
(101,430 |
) |
|
|
-65 |
% |
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
37,297 |
|
|
|
(22,547 |
) |
|
|
-60 |
% |
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
-77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,277 |
|
|
$ |
195,791 |
|
|
$ |
(125,514 |
) |
|
|
-64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
$ |
42,573 |
|
|
$ |
125,624 |
|
|
$ |
(83,051 |
) |
|
|
-66 |
% |
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
34,988 |
|
|
|
(20,912 |
) |
|
|
-60 |
% |
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,520 |
|
|
|
(17,520 |
) |
|
|
-100 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
|
-26 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
-18 |
% |
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,136 |
|
|
|
190,030 |
|
|
|
(160,894 |
) |
|
|
-85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
41,141 |
|
|
$ |
5,761 |
|
|
$ |
35,380 |
|
|
|
614 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues and the
related direct cost as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables do
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The reduction in reimbursables for 2008 as compared to 2007 is due to the sale of our North
Sea labor contract drilling services business. |
Operating Revenues. Our labor contract drilling services revenues decreased primarily due to
the sale of our North Sea labor contract drilling services business in April 2008. Additionally,
during the second quarter of 2008, we returned the jackup Noble Kolskaya, which we had operated
under a bareboat charter, to its owner. Revenues during 2008 related to our North Sea labor
contract drilling services business and the Noble Kolskaya were $22 million as compared to $124
million in 2007.
Engineering, consulting and other operating revenues decreased $2 million in 2008 from 2007
due to closure of the operations of our Triton Engineering Services, Inc. (“Triton”) subsidiary in
March 2007 and the sale of the rotary steerable assets and intellectual property of our Noble
Downhole Technology Ltd. (“Downhole Technology”) subsidiary in November 2007. We no longer conduct
engineering and consulting operations.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Labor contract drilling services costs and expenses decreased
in 2008 due to the sale of our North Sea labor contract drilling services business and the return
of the Noble Kolskaya to its owner.
28
Engineering, consulting and other expenses decreased $17 million in 2008 due to the sale of
the Downhole Technology assets and the closure of the operations of Triton.
The decrease in depreciation and amortization was primarily due to the return of the Noble
Kolskaya to its owner during 2008.
Gain on disposal of assets, net for 2008 primarily relates to the sale of our North Sea labor
contract drilling services business in April 2008. In connection with this transaction, we
recognized a gain of $36 million, net of closing costs, which included approximately $5 million in
cumulative currency translation adjustments.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense. Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, decreased $9 million due to
lower average debt levels in 2008 than 2007 primarily as a result of short-term borrowings during
2007 that contributed $8 million in interest expense. The short-term borrowings were used to repay
an inter-company loan in connection with the dissolution of a wholly-owned subsidiary. Capitalized
interest for 2008 was $48 million as compared to $50 million for 2007.
Interest income and other, net. Interest income decreased $3 million in 2008 from 2007
primarily as a result of the investment of the proceeds from the short-term borrowings described
above during 2007 that contributed $6 million in interest income during 2007. This decrease was
partially offset by interest on increased average cash and cash equivalent balances during 2008.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision increased $69 million primarily due to higher
pre-tax earnings in 2008 over 2007. The higher pre-tax earnings increased income tax expense by
approximately $81 million, offset by a lower effective tax rate of 18.4 percent in 2008 compared to
19.0 percent in 2007, that decreased income tax expense by approximately $12 million. The lower
effective tax rate in 2008 resulted primarily from higher pre-tax earnings of non-U.S. owned
assets, which generally have a lower statutory tax rate.
2007 Compared to 2006
General
Net income for 2007 was $1.2 billion, or $4.48 per diluted share, on operating revenues of
$3.0 billion, compared to net income for 2006 of $732 million, or $2.66 per diluted share, on
operating revenues of $2.1 billion.
Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates
The following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average
dayrates for our rig fleet for 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Rig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization (1) |
|
|
Operating Days (2) |
|
|
Average Dayrate |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackups |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
14,147 |
|
|
$ |
120,229 |
|
|
$ |
76,450 |
|
Semisubmersibles — >6,000’(3) |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
274,613 |
|
|
|
229,025 |
|
Semisubmersibles — <6,000’(4) |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
177,790 |
|
|
|
142,522 |
|
Drillships |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
119,669 |
|
|
|
99,795 |
|
Submersibles |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
74,171 |
|
|
|
67,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
19,395 |
|
|
|
19,287 |
|
|
$ |
139,948 |
|
|
$ |
97,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet,
excluding newbuild rigs under construction. |
|
(2) |
|
Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.
|
|
(3) |
|
These units have water depth ratings of 6,000 feet or greater. |
|
(4) |
|
These units have water depth ratings of less than 6,000 feet. |
29
Contract Drilling Services
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for
our contract drilling services segment for 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
and Expenses |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
2,714,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,886,987 |
|
|
$ |
880,049 |
|
|
$ |
696,264 |
|
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
83,944 |
|
|
|
68,141 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
57,158 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
283,225 |
|
|
|
248,800 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
83,695 |
|
|
|
41,986 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,799,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,956,508 |
|
|
$ |
1,314,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,033,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues and the
related direct cost as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables do
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
Operating Revenues. Contract drilling services revenues increased $827 million, or 44
percent, primarily due to higher average dayrates. Higher average dayrates increased revenues
approximately $812 million and the higher number of operating days increased revenues approximately
$15 million. Average dayrates increased from $97,837 to $139,948, or $42,111 (43 percent), in 2007
as compared to 2006. Higher average dayrates were received across all rig categories as strong
demand for drilling rigs drove dayrates higher. Operating days increased from 19,287 in 2006 to
19,395 in 2007, or 108 days. Two newbuilds, the ultra-deepwater semisubmersible Noble Clyde
Boudreaux and the enhanced premium jackup Noble Roger Lewis, which were added to the fleet in June
and September 2007, respectively, contributed 307 additional operating days in 2007. These
additional operating days were partially offset by 86 fewer operating days on our submersible the
Noble Fri Rodli, which was cold-stacked in October 2007, due to weakening demand in the shallow
waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and 49 fewer operating days on our drillship the Noble Roger
Eason, principally due to a fire incident in late November 2007. Additionally, in 2007, there were
49 more unpaid shipyard and regulatory inspection days than in 2006. Utilization of our contract
drilling fleet decreased to 95 percent for 2007 from 96 percent in 2006.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Contract drilling services expenses increased $184 million, or
26 percent, in 2007 as compared to 2006. The Noble Clyde Boudreaux and the Noble Roger Lewis, two
newbuild rigs which began operations in 2007, added $23 million of operating costs in 2007.
Additionally, we incurred start-up costs on our newbuild rigs under construction in advance of
their completion as rig personnel were added and other costs were incurred. Newbuild rig start-up
costs incurred in 2007 were $11 million, or $10 million higher than start-up costs incurred in
2006. Excluding the effect of our newbuild rigs, our labor costs increased $64 million due to
higher compensation, including retention programs designed to retain key rig and operations
personnel. Repair and maintenance costs during 2007 increased $27 million as rig equipment and
oilfield labor service costs continued to increase. Higher agency fees of $14 million were
incurred in 2007 in those countries where we retain agents who are compensated based on a
percentage of revenues. Higher safety and training costs of $9 million were incurred during the
year due to increased new hire personnel. We also incurred a $8 million increase in the costs of
rotating our rig crews due to more rigs operating internationally and experienced a $6 million
increase in offshore drilling crew personal injury claims. A $10 million charge, which equals our
insurance deductible in 2007, was recorded related to a fire incident onboard the Noble Roger Eason
in November 2007.
Depreciation and amortization increased $34 million, or 14 percent, to $283 million in 2007
due to $14 million of additional depreciation on the Noble Clyde Boudreaux, which began operations
in June 2007, and $20 million of additional depreciation related to other capital expenditures on
our fleet.
Hurricane Losses and Recoveries. Certain of our rigs operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico
sustained damage in 2005 as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. All such units had returned
to work by April 2006.
30
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recognized a net recovery of $5 million on the final
settlement of all remaining physical damage and loss of hire insurance claims for damage caused by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. This settlement was partially offset by an additional claim
loss of $2 million earlier in 2007, the net effect of which is reflected in “Hurricane losses and
recoveries, net” as a component of “Operating Costs and Expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of
Income. During 2006, we recorded $11 million in loss of hire insurance proceeds for two of our
units that suffered downtime attributable to the hurricanes. Our insurance receivables at December
31, 2007 related to claims for hurricane damage were $39 million. We received $39 million during
the first quarter of 2008 as final settlement of all remaining hurricane-related claims and
receivables for physical damage and loss of hire.
Other
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for
our other services for 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs |
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
and Expenses |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
$ |
156,508 |
|
|
$ |
111,201 |
|
|
$ |
125,624 |
|
|
$ |
91,353 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
17,520 |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
Reimbursables (1) |
|
|
37,297 |
|
|
|
24,213 |
|
|
|
34,988 |
|
|
|
22,362 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
195,791 |
|
|
$ |
143,731 |
|
|
$ |
190,030 |
|
|
$ |
139,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as revenues and the
related direct cost as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables do
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
Operating Revenues. Our labor contract drilling services revenues increased $45 million in
2007. Noble Kolskaya operations generated $23 million in higher revenues principally due to higher
dayrates. Our Canadian and North Sea labor contracts produced $22 million in additional revenue,
which was primarily due to increases in contract rates and operating days. The increased operating
activity in the North Sea also generated $13 million in additional reimbursables revenue in 2007.
Engineering, consulting and other operating revenues decreased $6 million primarily due to the
sale of the software business of our Maurer Technology Inc. (“Maurer”) subsidiary in June 2006, and
the closure of our Triton subsidiary in March 2007. Subsequent to such sale and closure, the
engineering, consulting and other operating revenues were primarily derived from the rotary
steerable system assets and intellectual property owned by Downhole Technology, which were sold in
November 2007.
Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses for labor contract drilling
services increased $34 million over 2006 due to higher labor costs in Canada and the North Sea and
additional operating days in the North Sea, which added $17 million in additional costs, and $17
million higher bareboat charter and other operating costs on the Noble Kolskaya. The increased
operating activity in the North Sea also generated $13 million in additional reimbursables expense
in 2007.
Engineering, consulting and other expenses increased $0.7 million in 2007. In March 2007, the
operations of our Triton subsidiary were closed resulting in closure costs of $2 million, including
a $0.4 million impairment of goodwill. In November 2007, Downhole Technology sold its rotary
steerable system assets and intellectual property resulting in a loss of $13 million for the sale
of these assets and intellectual property and other related exit activities, including a $9 million
impairment of goodwill. In June 2006, the software business of Maurer was sold resulting in a loss
of $4 million, including the write-off of goodwill totaling $5 million. Excluding the above
charges related to Triton, Downhole Technology and Maurer, costs and expenses declined $10 million
due to the disposal of these businesses and the reduction in project levels.
Depreciation and amortization increased $5 million in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily due
to $4 million higher depreciation on the Noble Kolskaya. The Noble Kolskaya bareboat charter
agreement expired in July 2008, and contract specific capital expenditures related to its operations are depreciated
over the remaining term of the bareboat charter.
31
Other Items
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Consolidated selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $40 million to $86 million in 2007 from $46 million in 2006. The
increase is principally due to $15 million of costs incurred in the internal investigation of our
Nigerian operations, $7 million related to the retirement and resignation of our former chief
executive officers, $7 million in higher employee-related costs for our employee benefit and
retention plans and the addition of personnel, and approximately $6 million higher professional
services fees including internal audit, tax and information technology services.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, decreased $3 million in 2007.
During 2007, we incurred interest expense of $8 million related to the debt incurred in connection
with short-term borrowings. This compares with interest expense of approximately $8 million
related to debt incurred in connection with our former investment in Smedvig ASA (“Smedvig”) during
2006. Excluding interest expense related to these debt balances, interest expense increased $10
million in 2007 primarily due to a higher level of borrowings in 2007 under our unsecured revolving
bank credit facility and a full year of interest expense on our 5.875% Senior Notes issued in May
2006. Interest capitalized in 2007 increased $13 million from $38 million in 2006 to $50 million
in 2007. The increase in interest incurred and interest capitalized is primarily attributable to
our newbuild construction.
Interest income and other, net. Other, net increased $1 million in 2007. Interest income
increased $4 million as a result of higher levels of cash investments in 2007, in part due to the
investment of the proceeds of short-term borrowings, which contributed $6 million of interest
income in 2007. In addition, 2006 included income of $4 million from the interests in deepwater
oil and gas properties received pursuant to a prior year litigation settlement, $2 million of gains
on sale of drill pipe and a $4 million charge for the settlement and release of claims by one of
our agents for commissions relating to certain of our Middle East division activities.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision increased $94 million primarily due to higher
pre-tax earnings in 2007, increasing income tax expense by $117 million, offset by a decrease in
the effective tax rate from 20.6 percent in 2006 to 19.0 percent in 2007 decreasing income tax
expense by $23 million. The lower effective tax rate resulted primarily from higher pre-tax
earnings of non-U.S. owned assets, which generally have a lower statutory tax rate, and lower
pre-tax earnings of U.S. owned assets.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Our principal capital resource in 2008 was net cash from operating activities of $1.9 billion,
which compared to $1.4 billion and $1.0 billion in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in
net cash from operating activities in 2008 was primarily attributable to higher net income. At
December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $513 million and $600 million available
under our bank credit facility. We had working capital of $561 million and $367 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total debt as a percentage of total debt plus
shareholders’ equity was 14.9 percent and 15.4 percent at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As
a result of the significant cash generated by our operations, our cash on hand and the
availability under our bank credit facility, we believe our liquidity and financial condition are
sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash flow needs for 2009 including:
|
• |
|
normal recurring operating expenses; |
|
|
• |
|
short-term debt service requirements; |
|
|
• |
|
recurring capital expenditures; |
|
|
• |
|
repurchase of, and dividends on, our ordinary shares, or if the Transaction is
completed, distributions with respect to a reduction in par value; and |
|
|
• |
|
contributions to our pension plans. |
32
The recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and
credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide and may
impact our liquidity and financial condition if conditions in the financial markets do not improve. It may be difficult or
more expensive for us to access the capital markets or borrow money at a time when we would like,
or need, to access capital, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to react to changing
economic and business conditions, and to fund our operations and capital expenditures and to make
acquisitions. For more information relating to the risks affecting our business, see “Item 1A.
Risk Factors”.
Capital Expenditures
Our primary liquidity requirement in 2009 will be for capital expenditures. We had total
capital expenditures of $1.2 billion in 2008, and $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion for 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
At December 31, 2008, we had five rigs under construction, and capital expenditures for new
construction in 2008 totaled $800 million. Capital expenditures for newbuild rigs in 2008 included
$219 million for the Noble Danny Adkins, $218 million for the Noble Jim Day, $166 million for the
Noble Dave Beard and $99 million for our Globetrotter-class drillship. Additionally, new
construction capital expenditures for 2008 included $98 million for our remaining newbuilds, which
include the Noble Scott Marks and the recently completed Noble Hans Deul. Other capital
expenditures totaled $324 million in 2008, which included approximately $116 million for major
upgrade projects. Capitalized major maintenance expenditures, which typically occur every 3 to 5
years, totaled $108 million in 2008.
Our total capital expenditures budget for 2009 is approximately $1.3 billion. In connection
with our 2009 and future capital expenditure programs, we have entered into certain commitments,
including shipyard and purchase commitments, for approximately $1.2 billion, of which we expect to
spend $825 million in 2009. Our remaining 2009 capital expenditure budget will generally be spent
at our discretion. We may accelerate or delay capital projects, as needed.
From time to time we consider possible projects that would require capital expenditures or
other cash expenditures that are not included in our capital budget, and such unbudgeted capital or
cash expenditures could be significant. In addition, we will continue to evaluate acquisitions of
drilling units from time to time. Other factors that could cause actual capital expenditures to
materially exceed planned capital expenditures include delays and cost overruns in shipyards
(including costs attributable to labor shortages), shortages of equipment, latent damage or
deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions,
and changes in design criteria or specifications during repair or construction.
Ordinary Share Repurchases and Dividends
Our Board of Directors has authorized and adopted a share repurchase program. At December 31,
2008, 18.3 million ordinary shares remained available under this authorization. Share repurchases
for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Year Ended |
|
of Shares |
|
|
Total Cost |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
December 31, |
|
Purchased |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
per Share |
|
2008 |
|
|
7,965,109 |
|
|
$ |
331,514 |
|
|
$ |
41.62 |
|
2007 |
|
|
4,219,000 |
|
|
|
178,494 |
|
|
|
42.31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
7,600,000 |
|
|
|
267,021 |
|
|
|
35.13 |
|
Additionally, during 2006, we completed an odd-lot offer to purchase ordinary shares by
purchasing 12,060 shares tendered during the offer for $0.4 million. Additional repurchases, if
any, may be made on the open market or in private transactions at prices determined by us.
Our most recent quarterly dividend declaration, to be paid on March 2, 2009 to holders of
record on February 11, 2009, was $0.04 per ordinary share, or an aggregate of approximately $42
million on an annualized basis. The declaration and payment of dividends in the future are at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and the amount thereof will depend on our results of
operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future business prospects, contractual
restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. In addition, if our
proposed Transaction is completed, all dividends by the new Swiss parent company must be approved
in advance by the shareholders of the company, and we may propose to effect distributions through a reduction in
par value. Such a reduction in par value could affect the timing of the distribution payments.
33
Contributions to Pension Plans
In August 2006, U.S. President Bush signed into law the Pension Protection Act of 2006
(“PPA”). The PPA requires that pension plans fund towards a target of at least 100 percent with a
transition through 2011 and increases the amount we are allowed to contribute to our U.S. pension
plans in the near term. During 2008, 2007 and 2006 we made contributions to our non-U.S. and U.S.
pension plans totaling $21 million, $54 million and $20 million, respectively. We expect the
minimum aggregate contributions to our non-U.S. and U.S. plans in 2009, subject to applicable law,
to be $6 million. We continue to monitor and evaluate funding options based upon market conditions
and may increase contributions at our discretion.
Credit Facility and Long-Term Debt
We have a $600 million unsecured bank credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which was
originally scheduled to mature on March 15, 2012. During the first quarter of 2008, the term of
the Credit Facility was extended for an additional one-year period to March 15, 2013. During this
one-year extension period, the total amount available under the Credit Facility will be $575
million, but we have the right to seek an increase of the total amount available during that period
to $600 million. We may, subject to certain conditions, request that the term of the Credit
Facility be further extended for an additional one-year period. Our subsidiary, Noble Drilling
Corporation (“Noble Drilling”), has guaranteed the obligations under the Credit Facility. Pursuant
to the terms of the Credit Facility, we may, subject to certain conditions, elect to increase the
amount available up to $800 million. Borrowings may be made under the facility (i) at the sum of
Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the Credit Facility) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the
Credit Facility; 0.235 percent based on our current credit ratings), or (ii) at the base rate,
determined as the greater of the prime rate for U.S. Dollar loans announced by Citibank, N.A. in
New York or the sum of the weighted average overnight federal funds rate published by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York plus 0.50 percent. The Credit Facility contains various covenants,
including a debt to total tangible capitalization covenant that limits this ratio to 0.60. As of
December 31, 2008, our debt to total tangible capitalization was 0.15. In addition, the Credit
Facility includes restrictions on certain fundamental changes such as mergers, unless we are the
surviving entity or the other party assumes the obligations under the Credit Facility, and the
ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets unless to a subsidiary. The
Credit Facility also limits our subsidiaries’ additional indebtedness, excluding intercompany
advances and loans, to 10 percent of our consolidated net assets, as defined in the Credit
Facility, unless a subsidiary guarantee is issued to the parent company borrower. There are also
restrictions on our incurring or assuming additional liens in certain circumstances. We were in
compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2008. We continually
monitor compliance under our Credit Facility covenants and, based on our expectations for 2009,
expect to remain in compliance.
In connection with the Transaction, in January 2009 we obtained consent agreements
(the “Consents”) with certain lenders under the Credit Facility necessary to effect certain waivers
of default under the Credit Facility that would result from the technical change of ownership of
the Company that would occur as a result of the Transaction. Pursuant to the Consents, the required
lenders under the Credit Facility (i) consented to the Transaction and (ii) waived any default or
event of default under the change of ownership event of default set forth in Section 7.1(j) of the
Credit Facility that would arise due to the Transaction.
The Credit Facility provides us with the ability to issue up to $150 million in letters of
credit. While the issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding, it
does reduce the amount available. At December 31, 2008, we had
no borrowing or letters of credit
outstanding under the Credit Facility. We believe that we maintain good relationships with our
lenders under the Credit Facility, and we believe that our lenders have the liquidity and
capability to perform should the need arise for us to draw on the Credit Facility.
In November 2008, we issued through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Holding
International Limited (“NHIL”), $250 million principal amount of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2014.
Proceeds, net of discount and issuance costs, totaled approximately $247 million. Interest on the
7.375% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually, in arrears, on March 15 and September 15 of each
year. The 7.375% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of NHIL, unconditionally guaranteed
by Noble, and are redeemable, as a whole or from time to time in part, at our option on any date prior to maturity at prices equal to 100 percent of the outstanding principal
amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued interest to the redemption date plus a make-whole
premium, if any is required to be paid.
34
The indentures governing our four series of outstanding senior unsecured notes contain
covenants that place restrictions on certain merger and consolidation transactions, unless we are
the surviving entity or the other party assumes the obligations under the indenture, and on the
ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, there are
restrictions on incurring or assuming certain liens and sale and lease-back transactions. At
December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all our debt covenants. We continually monitor
compliance with the covenants under our notes and, based on our expectations for 2009, expect to
remain in compliance during the year.
At December 31, 2008, we had letters of credit of $150 million and performance and tax
assessment bonds totaling $301 million supported by surety bonds outstanding. Of the letters of
credit outstanding, $100 million were issued to support bank bonds in connection with our drilling
units in Nigeria. Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries issue, from time to time, guarantees
of the temporary import status of rigs or equipment imported into certain countries in which we
operate. These guarantees are issued in lieu of payment of custom, value added or similar taxes in
those countries.
Our debt increased to $923 million (including current maturities of $173 million) at December
31, 2008 from $785 million (including current maturities of $10 million) at December 31, 2007,
primarily due to the issuance of the 7.375% Senior Notes discussed above, partially offset by the
repayment of the outstanding balance under the Credit Facility in 2008. We expect to meet current
maturity requirements either through cash on hand at maturity or by using borrowings available
under our Credit Facility. Other than our outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds discussed
above, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had no other off-balance sheet debt or other off-balance
sheet arrangements. For additional information on our long-term debt, see Note 5 to our
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Summary of Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and commitments at December
31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
(including current maturities) |
|
$ |
923,487 |
|
|
$ |
172,698 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
299,837 |
|
|
$ |
450,952 |
|
Interest payments |
|
|
330,515 |
|
|
|
53,410 |
|
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
|
51,190 |
|
|
|
40,908 |
|
|
|
82,627 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
22,108 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
Pension plan contributions (1) |
|
|
11,687 |
|
|
|
6,699 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
Purchase commitments |
|
|
1,222,875 |
|
|
|
824,848 |
|
|
|
255,794 |
|
|
|
142,233 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
2,510,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,065,419 |
|
|
$ |
313,297 |
|
|
$ |
197,248 |
|
|
$ |
51,951 |
|
|
$ |
341,386 |
|
|
$ |
541,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pension plan contributions are estimated by third-party actuaries for defined benefit plan
funding in 2009 and estimated future benefit payments beginning in 2010 for the unfunded
nonqualified excess benefit plan. Estimates of minimum funding for our qualified benefit plan
beyond the 2009 plan year are not available. |
35
At December 31, 2008, we had other commitments that we are contractually obligated to fulfill
with cash if the obligations are called. These obligations include letters of credit and surety
bonds that guarantee our performance as it relates to our drilling contracts, insurance, tax and
other obligations in various jurisdictions. These letters of credit and surety bond obligations
are not normally called as we typically comply with the underlying performance requirement. The
following table summarizes our other commercial commitments at December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Other Commercial Commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
$ |
150,223 |
|
|
$ |
137,099 |
|
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
301,282 |
|
|
|
133,692 |
|
|
|
41,182 |
|
|
|
107,167 |
|
|
|
19,241 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
451,505 |
|
|
$ |
270,791 |
|
|
$ |
48,752 |
|
|
$ |
112,721 |
|
|
$ |
19,241 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the
estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. Critical accounting
policies and estimates that most significantly impact our consolidated financial statements are
described below.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, reduced by provisions to recognize economic
impairment in value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value
may not be recoverable. Major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are
sold, retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are
eliminated from the accounts and the gain or loss is recognized. Drilling equipment and facilities
are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as of the date
placed in service or date of major refurbishment. Estimated useful lives of our drilling equipment
range from three to twenty-five years. Other property and equipment is depreciated using the
straight-line method over useful lives ranging from two to twenty-five years.
Interest is capitalized on construction-in-progress at the interest rate on debt incurred for
construction or at the weighted average cost of debt outstanding during the period of construction.
Overhauls and scheduled maintenance of equipment are performed based on the number of hours
operated in accordance with our preventative maintenance program. Routine repair and maintenance
costs are charged to expense as incurred; however, the costs of the overhauls and scheduled major
maintenance projects that benefit future periods and which typically occur every three to five
years are deferred when incurred and amortized over an equivalent period. The deferred portion of
these major maintenance projects is included in “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Impairment of Assets
We evaluate the realization of our long-lived assets, including property and equipment and
goodwill, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. We evaluated goodwill on at least an annual basis. An impairment loss on
our property and equipment exists when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from
the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any
impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset’s carrying value as compared to its
estimated fair value. An impairment loss on our goodwill exists when the carrying amount of the
goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
During 2007, we recorded a $0.4 million impairment on long-lived assets in conjunction with
the disposal of our technology services business. No impairment losses were recorded on our
property and equipment balances during the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2006. During 2007 and
2006, we recorded impairments to goodwill of $10 million and $5 million, respectively, in
conjunction with our planned rationalization of our technology services division. All of our
goodwill was attributable to our engineering and consulting services, and we had no goodwill
recorded as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
36
Insurance Reserves
We maintain various levels of self-insured retention for certain losses including property
damage, loss of hire, employment practices liability, employers’ liability, and general liability,
among others. We accrue for property damage and loss of hire charges on a per event basis.
Employment practices liability claims are accrued based on actual claims during the year.
Maritime employer’s liability claims subject to U.S. jurisdiction (Jones Act liabilities) are
generally estimated using actuarial determinations. Maritime employer’s liability claims that fall
outside of U.S. jurisdiction and general liability claims are generally estimated by our internal
claims department by evaluating the facts and circumstances of each claim (including incurred but
not reported claims) and making estimates based upon historical experience with similar claims.
Pension and other employee benefit plans
Our defined benefit pension and other employee benefit plans are accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). Pension
obligations are actuarially determined and are affected by assumptions including, but not limited
to, expected return on plan assets, discount rates, compensation increases and employee turnover
rates. We evaluate our assumptions periodically and make adjustments to these assumptions and the
recorded liabilities as necessary.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues generated from our dayrate-basis drilling contracts, labor contracts, engineering and
consulting services are recognized as services are performed. We may receive lump-sum fees for the
mobilization of equipment and personnel. Mobilization fees received and costs incurred to mobilize
a drilling unit from one market to another are recognized over the term of the related drilling
contract. Costs incurred to relocate drilling units to more promising geographic areas in which a
contract has not been secured are expensed as incurred. Lump-sum payments received from customers
relating to specific contracts, including equipment modifications, are deferred and amortized to
income over the term of the drilling contract. We record reimbursements from customers for
“out-of-pocket” expenses as revenues and the related direct cost as operating expenses.
Reimbursements for loss of hire under our insurance programs are included in “Hurricane losses and
recoveries, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Income included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
Income Taxes
The Cayman Islands does not impose corporate income taxes. Consequently, income taxes have
been provided based on the laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are
conducted or in which we or our subsidiaries are considered resident for income tax purposes.
Applicable U.S. and non-U.S. income and withholding taxes have not been provided on undistributed
earnings of our subsidiaries. We do not intend to repatriate such undistributed earnings for the
foreseeable future except for distributions upon which incremental income and withholding taxes
would not be material. In certain circumstances, we expect that, due to changing demands of the
offshore drilling markets and the ability to redeploy our offshore drilling units, certain of such
units will not reside in a location long enough to give rise to future tax consequences. As a
result, no deferred tax liability or asset has been recognized in these circumstances. Should our
expectations change regarding the length of time an offshore drilling unit will be used in a given
location, we will adjust deferred taxes accordingly. Our recognition of a deferred tax asset or
liability in these circumstances would not have had a material effect on our financial position or
results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. As a result of the initial adoption
of FIN 48, we recognized an additional reserve for uncertain tax positions and a corresponding
reduction of retained earnings.
37
Share-Based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(“SFAS 123(R)”). Accordingly, we record the grant date fair value of share-based compensation
arrangements as compensation cost using a straight-line method over the service period.
Share-based compensation is expensed or capitalized based on the nature of the employee’s
activities.
Inherent in expensing stock options and other share-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)
are several judgments and estimates that must be made. These include determining the underlying
valuation methodology for share compensation awards and the related inputs utilized in each
valuation, such as our expected stock price volatility, expected term of the employee option,
expected dividend yield, the expected risk-free interest rate, the underlying stock price and the
exercise price of the option. Changes to these assumptions could result in different valuations
for individual share awards. For option valuations, we utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, however, we also use lattice models to verify that the assumptions used are reasonable. We
utilize the Monte Carlo Simulation Model for valuing the performance-vested restricted stock
awards. Additionally, for such awards, similar assumptions were made for each of the companies
included in the defined index and the peer group of companies in order to simulate the future
outcome using the Monte Carlo Simulation Model.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements.
The amount of net income attributable to a noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated
net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 requires that changes in a parent’s
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if
the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a
parent recognize a gain or loss when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be
measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date.
SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosures regarding the interests of the parent and its
noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December
15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have
a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), the acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain specific items,
including:
|
• |
|
transaction costs will generally be expensed as incurred; |
|
|
• |
|
contingent consideration will be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date; |
|
|
• |
|
acquired contingent liabilities will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date
and subsequently measured at either the higher of such amount or the amount determined
under existing guidance for non-acquired contingencies; |
|
|
• |
|
fair value of the purchase price, including the issuance of equity securities, will be
determined on the acquisition date (closing) instead of announcement date; |
|
|
• |
|
restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed
subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
|
• |
|
changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after
the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. |
SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. Due to the prospective application
requirements, it is not possible at this time to determine what impact, if any, this standard will
have on our financial position or results of operations.
38
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires entities with derivative instruments to
disclose information to enable financial statement users to understand how and why the entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. The new standard becomes effective 60 days following the SEC’s
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, which
approval is pending. Our adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1
states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are
participating securities and should be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant
to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that FSP EITF 03-6-1
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP FAS 157-3”). FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that
financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance. The application of FSP
FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP FAS 132(R)”). FSP FAS 132(R) requires disclosure of
additional information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, the
development of fair value measurements, and concentrations of risk. The FSP FAS 132(R) is effective
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Our adoption of FSP FAS 132(R) will not have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
For additional information on our accounting policies, see Note 1 to our accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market risk is the potential for loss due to a change in the value of a financial instrument
as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, currency exchange rates or equity prices, as further
described below.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to market risk exposure related to changes in interest rates on borrowings
under the Credit Facility. Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility is at an agreed upon
percentage point spread over LIBOR, or a base rate stated in the agreement. At December 31, 2008,
we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.
Foreign Currency Risk
Although we conduct business globally, a substantial majority of the value of our foreign
transactions are denominated in U.S. Dollars. With certain exceptions, typically involving
national oil companies, we structure our drilling contracts entirely in U.S. Dollars to mitigate
our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies. Other than trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable, which mostly offset one another, we do not
currently have material amounts of assets, liabilities, or financial instruments that are sensitive
to foreign currency exchange rates.
39
We periodically enter into derivative instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we may conduct hedging activities in future
periods to mitigate such exposure. We have documented policies and procedures to monitor and
control the use of derivative instruments. We do not engage in derivative transactions for
speculative or trading purposes, nor are we a party to leveraged derivatives.
Our North Sea operations have a significant amount of their cash operating expenses payable in
either the Euro or British Pound, and we typically maintain forward contracts settling monthly in
Euros and British Pounds. During 2008, we settled all outstanding forward contracts related to our
North Sea operations.
During the third quarter of 2008, we entered into a firm commitment for the construction of a
newbuild drillship. The drillship will be constructed in two phases, with the second phase being
installation and commissioning of the topside equipment. The contract for this second phase of
construction is denominated in Euros, and in order to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates, we entered into forward contracts to purchase Euros. As of December 31,
2008, the aggregate notional amount of the forward contracts was 80 million Euros. Each forward
contract settles in connection with required payments under the construction contract. We are
accounting for these forward contracts as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133”). The fair market value
of those derivative instruments is included in “Other current assets/liabilities” or “Other
assets/liabilities,” depending on when the forward contract is expected to be settled. Gains and
losses from these fair value hedges are recognized in earnings currently along with the change in
fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The fair market value of
these outstanding forward contracts, which are included in “Other current liabilities” and “Other
liabilities,” totaled approximately $5 million at December 31, 2008. A one percent change in the
exchange rate for the Euro would change the fair value of these forward contracts by approximately
$1 million.
Market Risk
We sponsor the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan (“Restoration
Plan”). The Restoration Plan is a nonqualified, unfunded employee benefit plan under which certain
highly compensated employees may elect to defer compensation in excess of amounts deferrable under
our 401(k) savings plan. The Restoration Plan has no assets, and amounts withheld for the
Restoration Plan are kept by us for general corporate purposes. The investments selected by
employees and the associated returns are tracked on a phantom basis. Accordingly, we have a
liability to employees for amounts originally withheld plus phantom investment income or less
phantom investment losses. We are at risk for phantom investment income and, conversely, benefit
should phantom investment losses occur. At December 31, 2008, our liability under the Restoration
Plan totaled $8 million. During 2008, we purchased investments that closely correlate to the
investment elections made by participants in the Restoration Plan in order to mitigate the impact
of the phantom investment income and losses on our financial statements. The value of these
investments held for our benefit totaled $7 million at December 31, 2008. A one percent change in
the fair value of the phantom investments would change our liability by approximately $0.1 million.
Any change in the fair value of the phantom investments would be mitigated by a change in the
investments held for our benefit.
40
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The following financial statements are filed in this Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Noble Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of income, of cash flows, of shareholders’ equity and of comprehensive income present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Noble Corporation and its subsidiaries
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management
is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements
and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in
which it accounts for uncertain income tax positions effective January 1, 2007.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
February 27, 2009
42
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
513,311 |
|
|
$ |
161,058 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
644,840 |
|
|
|
613,115 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
39,066 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
21,207 |
|
|
|
20,721 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
47,467 |
|
|
|
26,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,240,341 |
|
|
|
860,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling equipment and facilities |
|
|
7,423,440 |
|
|
|
6,354,782 |
|
Other |
|
|
105,340 |
|
|
|
80,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,528,780 |
|
|
|
6,434,951 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,886,231 |
) |
|
|
(1,639,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,642,549 |
|
|
|
4,795,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
219,441 |
|
|
|
219,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,102,331 |
|
|
$ |
5,876,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
172,698 |
|
|
$ |
10,334 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
259,107 |
|
|
|
198,395 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
75,449 |
|
|
|
115,914 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
107,211 |
|
|
|
85,641 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
11,325 |
|
|
|
9,951 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
53,203 |
|
|
|
72,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
678,993 |
|
|
|
492,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
750,789 |
|
|
|
774,182 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
265,018 |
|
|
|
240,621 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
121,284 |
|
|
|
65,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,816,084 |
|
|
|
1,573,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST |
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
|
|
(5,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares-par value $0.10 per share; 400,000 shares authorized;
261,899 and 268,223 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
26,190 |
|
|
|
26,822 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
402,115 |
|
|
|
683,697 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
4,919,667 |
|
|
|
3,602,870 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(57,257 |
) |
|
|
(5,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,290,715 |
|
|
|
4,308,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,102,331 |
|
|
$ |
5,876,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
43
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OPERATING REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
3,298,850 |
|
|
$ |
2,714,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,886,987 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
90,849 |
|
|
|
121,241 |
|
|
|
92,354 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
55,078 |
|
|
|
156,508 |
|
|
|
111,201 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
9,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,446,501 |
|
|
|
2,995,311 |
|
|
|
2,100,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
|
1,011,882 |
|
|
|
880,049 |
|
|
|
696,264 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
79,327 |
|
|
|
105,952 |
|
|
|
79,520 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
42,573 |
|
|
|
125,624 |
|
|
|
91,353 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,520 |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
356,658 |
|
|
|
292,987 |
|
|
|
253,325 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
74,143 |
|
|
|
85,831 |
|
|
|
46,272 |
|
Hurricane losses and (recoveries), net |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,538,098 |
|
|
|
1,504,449 |
|
|
|
1,172,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
1,908,403 |
|
|
|
1,490,862 |
|
|
|
927,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(4,388 |
) |
|
|
(13,111 |
) |
|
|
(16,167 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
8,443 |
|
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,912,458 |
|
|
|
1,488,902 |
|
|
|
921,287 |
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
(351,463 |
) |
|
|
(282,891 |
) |
|
|
(189,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.90 |
|
|
$ |
4.52 |
|
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
|
$ |
2.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
264,782 |
|
|
|
266,700 |
|
|
|
271,834 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
266,805 |
|
|
|
269,330 |
|
|
|
274,756 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
44
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
356,658 |
|
|
|
292,987 |
|
|
|
253,325 |
|
Impairment loss on assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
|
|
4,849 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
51,026 |
|
|
|
20,509 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
34,681 |
|
|
|
21,560 |
|
Pension contributions |
|
|
(21,439 |
) |
|
|
(54,233 |
) |
|
|
(19,928 |
) |
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
56,027 |
|
|
|
24,406 |
|
Other changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(31,725 |
) |
|
|
(204,874 |
) |
|
|
(131,014 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(18,237 |
) |
|
|
23,276 |
|
|
|
(13,688 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(25,671 |
) |
|
|
53,746 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(19,620 |
) |
|
|
58,985 |
|
|
|
70,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
1,888,192 |
|
|
|
1,414,373 |
|
|
|
988,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New construction |
|
|
(799,736 |
) |
|
|
(754,967 |
) |
|
|
(670,951 |
) |
Other capital expenditures |
|
|
(323,955 |
) |
|
|
(423,657 |
) |
|
|
(382,093 |
) |
Major maintenance expenditures |
|
|
(107,630 |
) |
|
|
(108,419 |
) |
|
|
(69,017 |
) |
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
|
40,830 |
|
|
|
45,260 |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
Hurricane insurance receivables |
|
|
21,747 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
39,451 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
Proceeds from sale of business unit |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from Smedvig disposition |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
691,261 |
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
46,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(1,129,293 |
) |
|
|
(1,223,873 |
) |
|
|
(349,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowing |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Short-term debt payment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(685,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Borrowings on bank credit facilities |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Payments on bank credit facilities |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
|
(120,000 |
) |
|
|
(135,000 |
) |
Payments of other long-term debt |
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
|
|
(9,630 |
) |
|
|
(608,970 |
) |
Net proceeds from employee stock transactions |
|
|
9,304 |
|
|
|
38,995 |
|
|
|
21,186 |
|
Tax benefit of employee stock transactions |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of debt issuance costs |
|
|
249,238 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
295,801 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(244,198 |
) |
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
(21,825 |
) |
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(314,122 |
) |
|
|
(195,797 |
) |
|
|
(250,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
(406,646 |
) |
|
|
(91,152 |
) |
|
|
(698,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
352,253 |
|
|
|
99,348 |
|
|
|
(60,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
161,058 |
|
|
|
61,710 |
|
|
|
121,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
513,311 |
|
|
$ |
161,058 |
|
|
$ |
61,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
45
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Ordinary |
|
|
in Excess |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
(Unearned |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders’ |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
of Par Value |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Compensation) |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
274,018 |
|
|
$ |
27,402 |
|
|
$ |
1,010,769 |
|
|
$ |
1,736,015 |
|
|
$ |
(17,099 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,353 |
) |
|
$ |
2,731,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17,099 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,099 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
22,169 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
22,301 |
|
Contribution to employee
benefit plans |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
23,323 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,473 |
|
Restricted shares surrendered for
withholding taxes or forfeited |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(2,267 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(7,612 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(266,676 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(267,438 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
731,866 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
731,866 |
|
Dividends paid ($0.08 per share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,825 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,825 |
) |
Adoption of SFAS No. 158 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(24,240 |
) |
|
|
(24,240 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29,717 |
|
|
|
29,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
269,184 |
|
|
$ |
26,918 |
|
|
$ |
775,895 |
|
|
$ |
2,446,056 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(19,876 |
) |
|
$ |
3,228,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
35,818 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,948 |
|
Contribution to employee
benefit plans |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
47,066 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
47,325 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
Restricted shares surrendered for
withholding taxes or forfeited |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(8,258 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(4,219 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(178,070 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(178,492 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,206,011 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,206,011 |
|
Dividends paid ($0.12 per share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,809 |
|
|
|
14,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
268,223 |
|
|
$ |
26,822 |
|
|
$ |
683,697 |
|
|
$ |
3,602,870 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(5,067 |
) |
|
$ |
4,308,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
35,782 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,899 |
|
Contribution to employee
benefit plans |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
19,339 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19,441 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Restricted shares surrendered for
withholding taxes or forfeited |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(10,081 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(7,965 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
(330,718 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(331,514 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,560,995 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,560,995 |
|
Dividends paid ($0.91 per share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(244,198 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(244,198 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(52,190 |
) |
|
|
(52,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
261,899 |
|
|
$ |
26,190 |
|
|
$ |
402,115 |
|
|
$ |
4,919,667 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(57,257 |
) |
|
$ |
5,290,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
46
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(19,095 |
) |
|
|
3,664 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,003 |
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
4,614 |
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
Net pension plan gain (loss) (net of tax benefit of $16,360 in 2008
and tax provision of $5,458 in 2007) |
|
|
(31,806 |
) |
|
|
10,479 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization of deferred pension plan amounts (net of tax
provision of $413 in 2008 and $770 in 2007) |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(52,190 |
) |
|
|
14,809 |
|
|
|
29,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
1,508,805 |
|
|
$ |
1,220,820 |
|
|
$ |
761,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
47
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization and Business
Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands exempted company limited by shares (“Noble” or, together
with its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise, the “Company”, “we”,
“our” and words of similar import) is primarily engaged in contract drilling services worldwide.
We perform contract drilling services with our fleet of 63 mobile offshore drilling units located
worldwide. This fleet consists of 13 semisubmersibles, four dynamically positioned drillships, 43
jackups and three submersibles. The fleet count includes five units under construction, including
one F&G JU-2000E enhanced premium jackup, one dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh
environment Globetrotter-class drillship, and three deepwater dynamically positioned
semisubmersibles. As of January 8, 2009, approximately 87 percent of our fleet was deployed in
areas outside the United States, principally in the Middle East, India, Mexico, the North Sea,
Brazil and West Africa.
Proposed Transaction
In December 2008, we announced a proposed merger, reorganization and consolidation transaction
(the “Transaction”), which will restructure our corporate organization. The Transaction would
result in a new Swiss holding company also called Noble Corporation (“Noble-Switzerland”) serving
as the publicly traded parent of the Noble group of companies. The Transaction would effectively
change the place of incorporation of the publicly traded parent company from the Cayman Islands to
Switzerland. A meeting of members of Noble Corporation, the Cayman Islands company that is the
current ultimate parent company (“Noble-Cayman”), has been set for March 17, 2009 to approve the
Transaction, and, assuming we have obtained the necessary member approval, we plan to have a
subsequent hearing of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands on March 26, 2009 to approve the
Transaction. If the requisite member and court approvals are obtained, we expect to close the
Transaction promptly following the court approval.
In the Transaction, all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Noble-Cayman will be cancelled,
and Noble-Switzerland will issue, through an exchange agent, one share of Noble-Switzerland in
exchange for each share of Noble-Cayman, plus an additional 15 million shares of Noble-Switzerland
to Noble-Cayman, which may in turn subsequently transfer these shares to one or more other
subsidiaries of Noble-Switzerland, for future use to satisfy our obligation to deliver shares in
connection with awards granted under our employee benefits plans and other general corporate
purposes.
Stock Split
On July 27, 2007, our Board of Directors approved what is commonly referred to in the United
States as a “two-for-one stock split” of our ordinary shares effected in the form of a 100 percent
stock dividend to members (shareholders) of record on August 7, 2007. The stock dividend was
distributed on August 28, 2007 when shareholders of record were issued one additional ordinary
share for each ordinary share held.
All share and per share data included in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes have been adjusted to reflect the stock split for all periods presented.
As a result of the stock split, the number of restricted shares and stock options outstanding
and available for grant, and the exercise prices for the outstanding stock options under
share-based compensation plans, have been adjusted in accordance with the terms of the plans. Such
modifications have no impact on the amount of share-based compensation costs.
48
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned and
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. The equity method of accounting is used for investments in corporate
affiliates where we have a significant influence but not a controlling interest.
Foreign Currency Translation
We follow a translation policy in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. In non-U.S. locations where the U.S. Dollar has
been designated as the functional currency (based on an evaluation of such factors as the markets
in which the subsidiary operates, inflation, generation of cash flow, financing activities and
intercompany arrangements), local currency transaction gains and losses are included in net income.
In non-U.S. locations where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities
are translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date, while income and expense items
are translated at average rates of exchange during the year. The resulting gains or losses arising
from the translation of accounts from the functional currency to the U.S. Dollar are included in
“Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We did not recognize
any material gains or losses on foreign currency transactions or translations during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. We use the Canadian Dollar as the functional currency for
our labor contract drilling services in Canada.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits with banks and all highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Our cash, cash equivalents
and short-term investments are subject to potential credit risk, and certain of our cash accounts
carry balances greater than the federally insured limits. Cash and cash equivalents are held by
major banks or investment firms. Our cash management and investment policies restrict investments
to lower risk, highly liquid securities and we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit
standing of the financial institutions with which we conduct business.
In accordance with SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, cash flows from our labor contract
drilling services in Canada are calculated based on the Canadian Dollar. As a result, amounts
related to assets and liabilities reported on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows will not
necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies was not material in
2008, 2007 or 2006.
Investments in Marketable Securities
We account for investments in marketable securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (“SFAS No. 115”). Investments in
marketable securities held prior to December 31, 2006 were classified as “available-for-sale” and
carried at fair value with the unrealized holding gain or loss, net of deferred taxes, included in
“Comprehensive Income” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. During
2006, all “available-for-sale” securities were sold, and we held no investments in marketable
securities at December 31, 2006 or 2007. Investments in marketable securities held at December 31,
2008 were classified as trading securities and carried at fair value in “Other Current Assets” with
the unrealized gain or loss included in “Other Income” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Income.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, reduced by provisions to recognize economic
impairment in value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an asset’s carrying value
may not be recoverable. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was $2.3 billion and $1.8 billion,
respectively, of construction-in-progress. Such amounts are included in “Drilling equipment and
facilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Major replacements and improvements
are capitalized. When assets are sold, retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and the gain or loss is recognized.
Drilling equipment and facilities are depreciated using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives as of the date placed in service or date of major refurbishment. Estimated
useful lives of our drilling equipment range from three to twenty-five years. Other property and
equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over useful lives ranging from two to
twenty-five years.
49
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Interest is capitalized on construction-in-progress at the interest rate on debt incurred for
construction or at the weighted average cost of debt outstanding during the period of construction.
Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $48 million, $50
million and $38 million, respectively.
Overhauls and scheduled maintenance of equipment are performed based on the number of hours
operated in accordance with our preventative maintenance program. Routine repair and maintenance
costs are charged to expense as incurred; however, the costs of the overhauls and scheduled major
maintenance projects that benefit future periods and which typically occur every three to five
years are deferred when incurred and amortized over an equivalent period. The deferred portion of
these major maintenance projects is included in “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Such amounts totaled $171 million and $155 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Amortization of deferred costs for major maintenance projects is reflected in “Depreciation
and amortization” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The amount of such
amortization was $91 million, $76 million and $64 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Total repair and maintenance expense for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, exclusive of amortization of deferred costs for major maintenance projects,
was $169 million, $134 million and $111 million, respectively.
We evaluate the realization of property and equipment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment
loss on our property and equipment exists when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result
from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any
impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the estimated
fair value.
In 2007, we closed the operations of our Triton Engineering Services Inc. (“Triton”)
subsidiary resulting in closure costs of $2 million ($0.01 per diluted share), including a $0.4
million impairment of property and equipment. No impairment losses were recorded on our property
and equipment balances during the year ended December 31, 2008 or 2006.
Goodwill
We evaluated goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis, and on long-lived assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss on goodwill exists when the carrying amount of the goodwill
exceeds its implied fair value, as determined pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.
In 2007, we sold the rotary steerable system assets and intellectual property of our Noble
Downhole Technology Ltd. subsidiary for $10 million resulting in a pre-tax loss of $13 million
($0.05 per diluted share), including a $9 million impairment of goodwill. Also in 2007, the
closure of our Triton subsidiary resulted in a $0.4 million impairment of goodwill.
In June 2006, we sold the software business of our Maurer Technology Inc. subsidiary,
resulting in a pre-tax loss of $4 million ($0.01 per diluted share). This loss included the
write-off of goodwill totaling $5 million.
These losses on sale and closure are included in “Engineering, Consulting and Other operating
costs and expenses” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for their respective
years. All of our goodwill was attributable to our engineering and consulting services, and we had
no goodwill recorded as of December 31, 2008 or 2007.
50
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Deferred Costs
Deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the life
of the debt securities. The amortization of debt issuance costs is included in interest expense.
Insurance Reserves
We maintain various levels of self-insured retention for certain losses including property
damage, loss of hire, employment practices liability, employers’ liability, and general liability,
among others. We accrue for property damage and loss of hire charges on a per event basis.
Employment practices liability claims are accrued based on actual claims during the year.
Maritime employer’s liability claims subject to U.S. jurisdiction (Jones Act liabilities) are
generally estimated using actuarial determinations. Maritime employer’s liability claims that fall
outside of U.S. jurisdiction and general liability claims are generally estimated by our internal
claims department by evaluating the facts and circumstances of each claim (including incurred but
not reported claims) and making estimates based upon historical experience with similar claims. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, loss reserves for personal injury and protection claims totaled $26
million and $21 million, respectively, and such amounts are included in “Other Current Liabilities”
in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues generated from our dayrate-basis drilling contracts, labor contracts and engineering
and consulting services are recognized as services are performed.
We may receive lump-sum fees for the mobilization of equipment and personnel. Mobilization
fees received and costs incurred to mobilize a drilling unit from one market to another are
recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. Costs incurred to relocate drilling
units to more promising geographic areas in which a contract has not been secured are expensed as
incurred. Lump-sum payments received from customers relating to specific contracts, including
equipment modifications, are deferred and amortized to income over the term of the drilling
contract. Deferred revenues under drilling contracts totaled $8 million and $35 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and such amounts are included in “Other Current
Liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We record reimbursements from customers for “out-of-pocket” expenses as revenues and the
related direct cost as operating expenses. Reimbursements for loss of hire under our insurance
coverages are included in “Hurricane Recoveries and Losses, net” in the Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Income Taxes
The Cayman Islands does not impose corporate income taxes. Consequently, income taxes have
been provided based on the laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are
conducted or in which we or our subsidiaries are considered resident for income tax purposes.
Applicable U.S. and non-U.S. income and withholding taxes have not been provided on undistributed
earnings of our subsidiaries. We do not intend to repatriate such undistributed earnings for the
foreseeable future except for distributions upon which incremental income and withholding taxes
would not be material. In certain circumstances, we expect that, due to changing demands of the
offshore drilling markets and the ability to redeploy our offshore drilling units, certain of such
units will not reside in a location long enough to give rise to future tax consequences. As a
result, no deferred tax asset or liability has been recognized in these circumstances. Should our
expectations change regarding the length of time an offshore drilling unit will be used in a given
location, we will adjust deferred taxes accordingly.
We operate through various subsidiaries in numerous countries throughout the world including
the United States. Consequently, we are subject to changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations or
the interpretation or enforcement thereof in the U.S., the Cayman Islands or jurisdictions in which
we or any of our subsidiaries operate or is resident. Our income tax expense is based upon our
interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries
at the time that the expense was incurred. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or other taxing
authorities do not agree with our assessment of the effects of such laws, treaties and regulations,
this could have a material adverse effect on us including the imposition of a higher effective tax
rate on our worldwide earnings or a reclassification of the tax impact of our significant corporate
restructuring transactions.
51
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. As a result of the initial adoption
of FIN 48, we recognized an additional reserve for uncertain tax positions and a corresponding
reduction of retained earnings.
Net Income per Share
Our basic earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts have been computed based on the average number of
ordinary shares outstanding for the period, excluding non-vested restricted stock. Diluted EPS
reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury stock method, which could occur if options were
exercised and if restricted stock were fully vested.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
We account for share-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(“SFAS No. 123(R)”). Accordingly, we record the grant date fair value of share-based compensation
arrangements as compensation cost using a straight-line method over the service period.
Share-based compensation is expensed or capitalized based on the nature of the employee’s
activities.
Certain Significant Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and
uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different
amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been
used. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. Instead, its
application will be made pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
On February 6, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Partial Deferral of the
Effective Date of Statement 157, which deferred the effective date for one year for certain
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis. These nonfinancial items include reporting units measured at fair value in a
goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis. There was no impact for the partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 on our
consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the application of SFAS No. 157 to our
nonfinancial assets and liabilities to have a material impact on our financial position or results
of operations.
52
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to measure eligible assets and
liabilities at fair value. We adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008, and we did not elect
the fair value option for our financial instruments. Accordingly, there was no impact to our
consolidated financial statements as a result of this adoption.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements.
The amount of net income attributable to a noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated
net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 requires that changes in a parent’s
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if
the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a
parent recognize a gain or loss when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be
measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date.
SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosures regarding the interests of the parent and its
noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December
15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have
a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), the acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain specific items,
including:
|
• |
|
transaction costs will generally be expensed as incurred; |
|
• |
|
contingent consideration will be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date; |
|
• |
|
acquired contingent liabilities will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition date
and subsequently measured at either the higher of such amount or the amount determined
under existing guidance for non-acquired contingencies; |
|
• |
|
fair value of the purchase price, including the issuance of equity securities, will be
determined on the acquisition date (closing) instead of announcement date; |
|
• |
|
restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed
subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
• |
|
changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after
the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. |
SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008, and earlier adoption is prohibited. Due to the prospective application
requirements, it is not possible at this time to determine what impact, if any, this standard will
have on our financial position or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires entities with derivative instruments to
disclose information to enable financial statement users to understand how and why the entity uses
derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the entity’s financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
53
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The new standard
becomes effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board amendments to AU Section 411. Our adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1
states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are
participating securities and should be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant
to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that FSP EITF 03-6-1
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP FAS 157-3”). FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the
application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate
key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that
financial asset is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance. The application of FSP
FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP FAS 132(R)”). FSP FAS 132(R) requires disclosure of
additional information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, the
development of fair value measurements, and concentrations of risk. The FSP FAS 132(R) is effective
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Our adoption of FSP FAS 132(R) will not have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior period financial statements to
conform to current period presentations. We believe these reclassifications are immaterial as they
do not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In
our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007, we had previously included inventories as a
separate caption. As our inventories consist of spare parts, materials and supplies held for
consumption, rather than for sale to third parties, we have included this amount in “Other Current
Assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2007, inventories
totaled approximately $4 million.
54
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 2 — NET INCOME PER SHARE
The basic and diluted EPS computations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
are as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares — basic |
|
|
264,782 |
|
|
|
266,700 |
|
|
|
271,834 |
|
Effect of potentially dilutive shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and awards |
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares — diluted |
|
|
266,805 |
|
|
|
269,330 |
|
|
|
274,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income — basic and diluted |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.90 |
|
|
$ |
4.52 |
|
|
$ |
2.69 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
|
$ |
2.66 |
|
Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic net income per share are included in
diluted net income per share. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2006, stock options and
awards totaling 1.5 million and 0.4 million shares, respectively, were excluded from the diluted
net income per share calculation as they were not dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive stock
options and awards for the year ended December 31, 2007.
NOTE 3 — MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable Equity Securities
We entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) dated December 12,
2005 with Nora Smedvig, Peter T. Smedvig, Hjordis Smedvig, HKS AS, AS Veni, Petrus AS and Peder
Smedvig Capital AS (collectively, the “Sellers”) relating to our acquisition, directly and
indirectly, of 21,095,600 Class A shares and 2,501,374 Class B shares (collectively, the “Owned
Shares”) of Smedvig ASA (“Smedvig”). We completed our acquisition of the Owned Shares on December
23, 2005. The acquisition comprised 39.2 percent of the Class A shares and 28.9 percent of the
total capital shares of Smedvig. The purchase price was NOK 200 per Class A share and NOK 150 per
Class B share (the “Noble Purchase Price”), totaling NOK 4,594 million (or approximately US $691
million at the date of acquisition) before certain legal and other transaction costs. We financed
the acquisition of the Owned Shares, including related transaction costs, with an aggregate of $700
million in new debt borrowings.
Subsequent to our acquisition of the Owned Shares, SeaDrill Limited, a Bermudian limited
company (“SeaDrill”), reported that it had acquired control of 51.24 percent of the Class A shares
and 52.47 percent of the Smedvig capital, after which SeaDrill made a mandatory offer (the
“Mandatory Offer”) pursuant to Norwegian law (and a parallel tender offer in the U.S.) to purchase
all the shares of Smedvig not already owned by SeaDrill at a price of NOK 205 per Class A share and
NOK 165 per Class B share (the “SeaDrill Offer Price”).
On April 7, 2006, we sold the Owned Shares to SeaDrill pursuant to the Mandatory Offer for NOK
4,737 million. On April 10, 2006, we settled the forward currency contract described below and
received $691 million. Also on April 10, 2006, we prepaid the outstanding principal amount of $600
million under a credit agreement, which was entered into to finance a portion of the acquisition of
the Owned Shares. This credit agreement terminated as a result of all parties thereto completing
their obligations thereunder.
On April 18, 2006, pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, we paid to the Sellers the excess
of the SeaDrill Offer Price over the Noble Purchase Price on the Owned Shares sold to SeaDrill (an
aggregate of NOK 143 million, or $22 million), as a purchase price adjustment under the Share
Purchase Agreement.
55
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Our investment in Smedvig was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115 because of the
lack of significant influence over the operating and financial policies of Smedvig. Our investment
in Smedvig was
classified as available-for-sale pursuant to SFAS No. 115. Accordingly, the fair value of our
Smedvig investment was presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and unrealized holding gains or
losses were excluded from earnings and reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity,
“Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss,” until realized on April 7, 2006. At December 31, 2005, the
fair value of our Smedvig investment totaled $672 million and our cost basis totaled $692 million
resulting in an unrealized loss of $20 million, which was included as a component of “Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss.” This unrealized loss had approximately recovered to the original cost
by March 15, 2006, the date the forward currency contract described below was initiated.
On March 15, 2006, we entered into a forward currency contract which provided that the
counterparty would pay to us $692 million in exchange for NOK 4,594 million on April 18, 2006.
This transaction was entered into to hedge the foreign currency exposure on our investment in
Smedvig. We accounted for this forward currency contract as a “fair value” hedge pursuant to SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”). As a
result, the $14 million change in fair value of the Smedvig investment from March 15, 2006 to April
7, 2006 was recognized in “Other Income” and the corresponding change in the fair value of the
forward currency contract was charged to “Other Income.”
We owned no marketable equity securities as of December 31, 2007.
During 2008, we purchased investments that closely correlate to the investment elections made
by participants in the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan (“Restoration
Plan”) in order to mitigate the impact of the investment income and losses from the Restoration
Plan on our consolidated financial statements. The value of these investments held for our benefit
totaled $7 million at December 31, 2008 and were classified as trading securities and carried at
fair value in “Other Current Assets” with the unrealized gain or loss included in “Other Income” in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognized a loss of $2 million on these
investments during 2008.
Marketable Debt Securities
We recognized a net realized loss of $0.3 million related to the sale of marketable debt
securities in 2006. Realized gains and losses on sales of marketable debt securities are based on
the specific identification method.
We owned no marketable debt securities as of December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
NOTE 4 — SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
12,843 |
|
|
$ |
16,124 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
258,392 |
|
|
$ |
213,986 |
|
|
$ |
167,523 |
|
56
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 5 — DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
6.95% Senior Notes due 2009 |
|
|
149,998 |
|
|
|
149,987 |
|
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
299,837 |
|
|
|
299,800 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
249,257 |
|
|
|
— |
|
7.50% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
201,695 |
|
|
|
201,695 |
|
Project Financing — Thompson Notes |
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
33,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt |
|
|
923,487 |
|
|
|
784,516 |
|
Less: Current Maturities |
|
|
172,698 |
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
$ |
750,789 |
|
|
$ |
774,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a $600 million unsecured bank credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), which was
originally scheduled to mature on March 15, 2012. During the first quarter of 2008, the term of
the Credit Facility was extended for an additional one-year period to March 15, 2013. During this
one-year extension period, the total amount available under the Credit Facility will be $575
million, but we have the right to seek an increase of the total amount available during that period
to $600 million. We may, subject to certain conditions, request that the term of the Credit
Facility be further extended for an additional one-year period. Our subsidiary, Noble Drilling
Corporation (“Noble Drilling”), has guaranteed the obligations under the Credit Facility. Pursuant
to the terms of the Credit Facility, we may, subject to certain conditions, elect to increase the
amount available up to $800 million. Borrowings may be made under the facility (i) at the sum of
Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the Credit Facility) plus the Applicable Margin (as defined in the
Credit Facility; 0.235 percent based on our current credit ratings), or (ii) at the base rate,
determined as the greater of the prime rate for U.S. Dollar loans announced by Citibank, N.A. in
New York or the sum of the weighted average overnight federal funds rate published by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York plus 0.50 percent. The Credit Facility contains various covenants,
including a debt to total tangible capitalization covenant that limits this ratio to 0.60. As of
December 31, 2008, our debt to total tangible capitalization was 0.15. In addition, the Credit
Facility includes restrictions on certain fundamental changes such as mergers, unless we are the
surviving entity or the other party assumes the obligations under the Credit Facility, and the
ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets unless to a subsidiary. The
Credit Facility also limits our subsidiaries’ additional indebtedness, excluding intercompany
advances and loans, to 10 percent of our consolidated net assets, as defined in the Credit
Facility, unless a subsidiary guarantee is issued to the parent company borrower. There are also
restrictions on our incurring or assuming additional liens in certain circumstances. We were in
compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility at December 31, 2008. We continually
monitor compliance under our Credit Facility covenants and, based on our expectations for 2009,
expect to remain in compliance.
In November 2008, we issued through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Holding
International Limited, $250 million principal amount of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2014. Proceeds,
net of discount and issuance costs, totaled $247 million. Interest on the 7.375% Senior Notes is
payable semi-annually, in arrears, on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
In May 2006, Noble Corporation issued $300 million principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due
2013. Interest on the 5.875% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually, in arrears, on June 1 and
December 1 of each year.
In March 1999, Noble Drilling, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $150
million principal amount of 6.95% Senior Notes due 2009 and $250 million principal amount of 7.50%
Senior Notes due 2019 (together, the “Senior Notes”). Interest on the Senior Notes is payable on
March 15 and September 15 of each year.
57
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Our senior unsecured notes are redeemable, as a whole or from time to time in part, at our
option on any date prior to maturity at prices equal to 100 percent of the outstanding principal
amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued interest to the redemption date plus a make-whole
premium, if any is required to be paid. The indentures governing our four series of outstanding
senior unsecured notes contain covenants that place restrictions on certain merger and
consolidation transactions, unless we are the surviving entity or the other party assumes the
obligations under the indenture, and on the ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of
our assets. In addition, there are restrictions on incurring or assuming certain liens and sale
and lease-back transactions. At December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with all our debt
covenants. We continually monitor compliance under the covenants under our notes and, based on our
expectations for 2009, expect to remain in compliance.
On July 24, 2007, we entered into a short-term loan agreement (the “Short-Term Loan
Agreement”) with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as the initial lender and administrative
agent, pursuant to which we borrowed $685 million. Noble Drilling issued a guaranty of our
obligations under the Short-Term Loan Agreement. The proceeds of the borrowing were used to repay
an intercompany loan from a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. On September 26, 2007, the
short-term loan was repaid with proceeds distributed in connection with the liquidation and
dissolution of this subsidiary. The net pre-tax cost of this financing was $1 million.
In December 1998, Noble Drilling (Jim Thompson) Inc., an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of
Noble and owner of the Noble Jim Thompson, issued $115 million principal amount of its fixed rate
senior secured notes (the “Thompson Notes”) in four series. The Thompson Notes were repaid in full
upon their maturity in January 2009. The Thompson Notes were at interest rates of 7.12 percent and
7.25 percent per annum, were secured by a first naval mortgage on the Noble Jim Thompson, and were
guaranteed by Noble.
At December 31, 2008, we had letters of credit of $150 million and performance and
tax assessment bonds totaling $301 million supported by surety bonds outstanding. Of the letters
of credit outstanding, $100 million were issued to support bank bonds in connection with our
drilling units in Nigeria. Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries issue, from time to time,
guarantees of the temporary import status of rigs or equipment imported into certain countries in
which we operate. These guarantees are issued in lieu of payment of custom, value added or similar
taxes in those countries.
Aggregate principal repayments of total debt for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Credit Facility |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
6.95% Senior Notes due 2009 |
|
|
149,998 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
149,998 |
|
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
299,837 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
299,837 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249,257 |
|
|
|
249,257 |
|
7.50% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
201,695 |
|
|
|
201,695 |
|
Thompson Notes |
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
172,698 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
299,837 |
|
|
$ |
450,952 |
|
|
$ |
923,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value as used in SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
represents the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between
willing parties. The fair value of our senior notes was based on the quoted market prices for
similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of similar remaining maturities. The
following table presents the estimated fair value of our long-term debt as of December 31, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
6.95% Senior Notes due 2009 |
|
|
149,998 |
|
|
|
149,185 |
|
|
|
149,987 |
|
|
|
153,188 |
|
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013 |
|
|
299,837 |
|
|
|
294,495 |
|
|
|
299,800 |
|
|
|
303,867 |
|
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 |
|
|
249,257 |
|
|
|
249,838 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
7.50% Senior Notes due 2019 |
|
|
201,695 |
|
|
|
196,991 |
|
|
|
201,695 |
|
|
|
217,936 |
|
Project Financing — Thompson Notes |
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
33,034 |
|
|
|
33,034 |
|
NOTE 6 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share Repurchases
Share repurchases were made pursuant to the share repurchase program which our Board of
Directors authorized and adopted and which we announced on January 31, 2002. The program
authorization covered an aggregate of 30.0 million ordinary shares. On February 2, 2007, our Board
of Directors increased the total number of ordinary shares authorized for repurchase by 20.0
million additional ordinary shares. At December 31, 2008, 18.3 million ordinary shares remained
available under this authorization. Share repurchases for each of the three years ended December
31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Year Ended |
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Paid |
|
December 31, |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Total Cost |
|
|
per Share |
|
2008 |
|
|
7,965,109 |
|
|
$ |
331,514 |
|
|
$ |
41.62 |
|
2007 |
|
|
4,219,000 |
|
|
|
178,494 |
|
|
|
42.31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
7,600,000 |
|
|
|
267,021 |
|
|
|
35.13 |
|
Additionally, during 2006, we completed an odd-lot offer to purchase ordinary shares by
purchasing 12,060 shares tendered during the offer for $0.4 million.
59
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Share-Based Compensation Plans
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the “Modified Prospective
Application” method of transition. We record the grant date fair value of share-based payment
arrangements as compensation cost using a straight-line method over the service period.
Share-based compensation is expensed or capitalized based on the nature of the employee’s
activities. Under SFAS No. 123(R), an estimate of forfeitures is used in determining the amount of
compensation cost recognized.
Stock Plans
The Noble Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, as amended (the “1991
Plan”), provides for the granting of options to purchase our ordinary shares, with or without stock
appreciation rights, and the awarding of restricted shares to selected employees. In general, all
options granted under the 1991 Plan have a term of 10 years, an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of an ordinary share on the date of grant and generally vest over a three- or
four-year period. The 1991 Plan limits the total number of ordinary shares issuable under the plan
to 41.4 million. As of December 31, 2008, we had 3.1 million ordinary shares remaining available
for grant to employees under the 1991 Plan.
Prior to October 25, 2007, the Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Share Plan
for Non-Employee Directors (the “1992 Plan”) provided for the granting of nonqualified stock
options to our non-employee directors. We granted options at fair market value on the grant date.
The options are exercisable from time to time over a period commencing one year from the grant date
and ending on the expiration of 10 years from the grant date, unless terminated sooner as described
in the 1992 Plan. On October 25, 2007, the 1992 Plan was amended and restated to, among other
things, eliminate grants of stock options to non-employee directors and modify the annual award of
restricted ordinary shares from a fixed number of restricted ordinary shares to an
annually-determined variable number of restricted or unrestricted ordinary shares. The 1992 Plan
limits the total number of ordinary shares issuable under the plan to 1.6 million. As of December
31, 2008, we had 0.8 million ordinary shares remaining available for award to non-employee
directors under the 1992 Plan.
Stock Options
A summary of the status of stock options granted under both the 1991 Plan and 1992 Plan as of
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the changes during the year ended on those dates is presented
below (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of the year |
|
|
4,397,773 |
|
|
$ |
21.28 |
|
|
|
6,827,376 |
|
|
$ |
19.71 |
|
|
|
7,984,016 |
|
|
$ |
18.07 |
|
Granted |
|
|
168,277 |
|
|
|
43.01 |
|
|
|
215,370 |
|
|
|
35.76 |
|
|
|
456,436 |
|
|
|
36.32 |
|
Exercised (1) |
|
|
(1,007,750 |
) |
|
|
19.29 |
|
|
|
(2,591,861 |
) |
|
|
18.26 |
|
|
|
(1,505,180 |
) |
|
|
15.60 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,301 |
) |
|
|
24.07 |
|
|
|
(53,112 |
) |
|
|
26.20 |
|
|
|
(107,896 |
) |
|
|
26.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year (2) |
|
|
3,553,999 |
|
|
|
22.84 |
|
|
|
4,397,773 |
|
|
|
21.28 |
|
|
|
6,827,376 |
|
|
|
19.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year (2) |
|
|
3,232,260 |
|
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
|
4,102,891 |
|
|
$ |
20.44 |
|
|
|
5,913,296 |
|
|
$ |
18.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$37 million. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008 was
$11 million. |
60
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
The following table summarizes additional information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2008 (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Range of Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
$7.01 to $14.16 |
|
|
|
222,502 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.61 |
|
|
|
222,502 |
|
|
$ |
10.61 |
|
14.17 to 24.40 |
|
|
|
2,003,461 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
17.95 |
|
|
|
2,003,461 |
|
|
|
17.95 |
|
24.41 to 34.62 |
|
|
|
732,614 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
27.15 |
|
|
|
699,280 |
|
|
|
26.95 |
|
34.63 to 43.01 |
|
|
|
595,422 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
38.57 |
|
|
|
307,017 |
|
|
|
37.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7.01 to $43.01 |
|
|
|
3,553,999 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
22.84 |
|
|
|
3,232,260 |
|
|
$ |
21.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value information and related valuation assumptions for stock options granted are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per option granted |
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
13.11 |
|
|
$ |
11.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model. Assumptions used in the valuation are shown in the table above. The
expected term of options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be
outstanding and is derived from historical exercise behavior, current trends and values derived
from lattice-based models. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities of traded
options on our ordinary shares, historical volatility of our ordinary shares, and other factors.
The expected dividend yield is based on historical yields on the date of grant. The risk-free rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
A summary of the status of our non-vested stock options at December 31, 2008, and changes
during the year ended December 31, 2008, is presented below (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Under Outstanding |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Non-vested options at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
294,882 |
|
|
$ |
10.99 |
|
Granted |
|
|
168,277 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(117,308 |
) |
|
|
9.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(24,112 |
) |
|
|
15.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested options at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
321,739 |
|
|
$ |
13.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, there was $3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost remaining
for option grants awarded under the 1991 Plan. We attribute the service period to the vesting
period and the unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.4 years. Compensation cost recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008 related
to stock options totaled $3 million, or $2 million net of
income tax. Compensation cost recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007 related to stock
options totaled $8 million, or $6 million net of income tax.
61
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
We issue new ordinary shares to meet the share requirements upon exercise of stock options.
We have historically repurchased ordinary shares in the open market from time to time which
minimizes the dilutive effect of share-based compensation.
Restricted Stock
We have awarded both time-vested restricted stock and performance-vested restricted stock
under the 1991 Plan. The time-vested restricted stock awards generally vest over three-, four- or
five-year periods. The number of performance-vested restricted shares which vest will depend on
the degree of achievement of specified corporate performance criteria over a three-year performance
period.
The time-vested restricted stock is valued on the date of award at our underlying ordinary
share price. The total compensation for shares that ultimately vest is recognized over the service
period. The ordinary shares and related par value are recorded when the restricted stock is issued
and “Capital in excess of par value” is recorded as the share-based compensation cost is recognized
for financial reporting purposes.
The performance-vested restricted stock is valued on the date of grant based on the estimated
fair value. Estimated fair value is determined based on numerous assumptions, including an
estimate of the likelihood that our stock price performance will achieve the targeted thresholds
and the expected forfeiture rate. The fair value is calculated using a Monte Carlo Simulation
Model. The assumptions used to value the performance-vested restricted stock awards include
historical volatility, risk-free interest rates, and expected dividends over a time
period commensurate with the remaining term prior to vesting, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Valuation assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Additionally, similar assumptions were made for each of the companies included in the defined
index and the peer group of companies in order to simulate the future outcome using the Monte Carlo
Simulation Model.
A summary of the restricted share awards for each of the years in the period ended December 31
is as follows (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Time-vested restricted shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
752,160 |
|
|
|
688,513 |
|
|
|
1,123,566 |
|
Weighted-average share price at award date |
|
$ |
43.18 |
|
|
$ |
37.52 |
|
|
$ |
37.30 |
|
Weighted-average vesting period (years) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-vested restricted shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded (maximum available) |
|
|
348,758 |
|
|
|
563,068 |
|
|
|
193,552 |
|
Weighted-average share price at award date |
|
$ |
43.92 |
|
|
$ |
35.79 |
|
|
$ |
37.93 |
|
Three-year performance period ended December 31 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted-average award-date fair value |
|
$ |
24.26 |
|
|
$ |
13.63 |
|
|
$ |
13.84 |
|
We award both time-vested restricted stock and unrestricted ordinary shares under the 1992
Plan. The time-vested restricted stock awards generally vest over a three-year period. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, we awarded 45,281 unrestricted ordinary shares to non-employee
directors, resulting in related compensation cost of $2 million. We did not award any time-vested
restricted stock under the 1992 Plan during the year ended December 31, 2008.
62
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
A summary of the status of non-vested restricted shares at December 31, 2008, and changes
during the year ended December 31, 2008, is presented below (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Time-Vested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Performance-Vested |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Award-Date |
|
|
Restricted Shares |
|
|
Award-Date |
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Outstanding (1) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted shares at
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
1,364,996 |
|
|
$ |
37.13 |
|
|
|
716,250 |
|
|
$ |
12.36 |
|
Awarded |
|
|
752,160 |
|
|
|
43.18 |
|
|
|
348,758 |
|
|
|
24.26 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(524,802 |
) |
|
|
36.81 |
|
|
|
(233,435 |
) |
|
|
11.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(158,121 |
) |
|
|
41.69 |
|
|
|
(153,784 |
) |
|
|
13.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted shares at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,434,233 |
|
|
$ |
39.92 |
|
|
|
677,789 |
|
|
$ |
18.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of performance-vested restricted shares shown equals the shares that would vest if
the “maximum” level of performance is achieved. The minimum number of shares is zero and the
“target” level of performance is 67 percent of the amounts shown. |
At December 31, 2008, there was $34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
the time-vested restricted shares which is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average period of 1.5 years. The total award-date fair value of time-vested restricted
shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2008 was $19 million.
At December 31, 2008, there was $7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
the performance-vested restricted shares which is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average period of 1.6 years. The total potential compensation for performance-vested
restricted stock is recognized over the service period regardless of whether the performance
thresholds are ultimately achieved. During the year ended December 31, 2008, 91,972
performance-vested shares for the 2005-2007 performance period were forfeited. On December 31,
2008, 114,123 shares of the performance-vested restricted shares for the 2006-2008 performance
period vested and, in February 2009, 57,610 shares for the same performance period were forfeited.
Compensation cost recognized during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 related
to all restricted stock totaled $29 million ($24 million net of income tax), $25 million ($20
million net of income tax) and $16 million ($13 million net of income tax), respectively.
63
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 7 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
We report and display comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income (“SFAS 130”), which establishes standards for reporting and displaying
comprehensive income and its components. SFAS 130 requires enterprises to display comprehensive
income and its components in the enterprise’s financial statements, to classify items of
comprehensive income by their nature in the financial statements and to display the accumulated
balance of other comprehensive income separately in shareholders’ equity.
The following table sets forth the components of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” net
of deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
(12,469 |
) |
|
$ |
6,626 |
|
|
$ |
2,962 |
|
Unrealized gain on foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
Deferred pension plan amounts |
|
|
(44,788 |
) |
|
|
(13,912 |
) |
|
|
(26,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(57,257 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,067 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES
The Cayman Islands does not impose corporate income taxes. Consequently, income taxes have
been provided based on the laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are
conducted, or in which we or our subsidiaries are considered resident for income tax purposes. Our
U.S. subsidiaries are subject to a U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent.
The components of the net deferred taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Tax credit for foreign deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,805 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
Deferred pension plan amounts |
|
|
7,358 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other |
|
|
25,836 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
Non-U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred pension plan amounts |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
Other |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
41,265 |
|
|
|
23,344 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
41,265 |
|
|
$ |
23,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of net book basis over remaining tax basis |
|
$ |
(299,157 |
) |
|
$ |
(259,459 |
) |
Deferred pension plan amounts |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
Non-U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of net book basis over remaining tax basis |
|
|
(7,126 |
) |
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
(306,283 |
) |
|
$ |
(263,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
(265,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(240,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
745,276 |
|
|
$ |
612,348 |
|
|
$ |
455,960 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
1,167,182 |
|
|
|
876,554 |
|
|
|
465,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,912,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,488,902 |
|
|
$ |
921,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current — United States |
|
$ |
215,412 |
|
|
$ |
173,138 |
|
|
$ |
136,493 |
|
Current — Non-U.S. |
|
|
86,339 |
|
|
|
89,244 |
|
|
|
48,791 |
|
Deferred — United States |
|
|
47,307 |
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
Deferred — Non-U.S. |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
351,463 |
|
|
$ |
282,891 |
|
|
$ |
189,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. As a result of the initial adoption
of FIN 48, we recognized an additional reserve for
uncertain tax positions and a corresponding reduction of retained earnings totaling $17 million.
After the adoption of FIN 48, we had $35 million ($32 million net of related tax benefits) of
reserves for uncertain tax positions, including estimated accrued interest and penalties totaling
$7 million, which are included in “Other Liabilities.”
65
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
A reconciliation of FIN 48 amounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
68,096 |
|
|
$ |
34,910 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year (1) |
|
|
35,975 |
|
|
|
30,949 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(4,810 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Expiration of statutes |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Tax settlements |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance at December 31, |
|
|
97,876 |
|
|
|
68,096 |
|
Related tax benefits |
|
|
(4,776 |
) |
|
|
(6,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve at December 31, |
|
$ |
93,100 |
|
|
$ |
61,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$0.5 million and $21 million related to transactions recorded directly to equity for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
The increase in uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2008 was primarily due to tax
positions taken on returns filed. If these reserves of $93 million are not realized, the provision
for income taxes will be reduced by $66 million and equity would be directly increased by $27
million.
We include as a component of our income tax provision potential accrued interest and penalties
related to recognized tax contingencies within our global operations. Interest and penalties
accrued in 2008 totaled $3 million.
We do not anticipate that any tax contingencies resolved in the next 12 months will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, we file numerous income tax returns in the U.S.
and non-U.S. jurisdictions. In the normal course of business we are subject to examination by
taxing authorities throughout the world, including such jurisdictions as Benin, Brazil, Canada,
Cyprus, Denmark, Equatorial Guinea, India, Ivory Coast, Luxembourg, Mexico, Nigeria, Norway, Qatar,
Singapore, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States. We are no
longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for years before 2002 and non-U.S. income
tax examinations for years before 2000.
A reconciliation of statutory and effective income tax rates is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. tax rate which is different than the Cayman Islands rate |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Non-U.S. tax rates which are different than the
Cayman Islands rate |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Reserve for tax authority audits |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Release of valuation allowance |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
U.S. and non-U.S. return to provision adjustments |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2008, we generated and utilized $71 million of U.S. foreign tax credits. In 2007, we fully
utilized our foreign tax credits of $23 million.
66
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Deferred income taxes and the related dividend withholding taxes have not been provided on
approximately $1.0 billion of undistributed earnings of our U.S. subsidiaries. We consider such
earnings to be permanently reinvested in the U.S. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of
deferred income taxes associated with these unremitted earnings. If such earnings were to be
distributed, we would be subject to U.S. taxes, which would have a material impact on our profit
and loss.
NOTE 9 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Adoption of SFAS No. 158
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of SFAS Nos. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (“SFAS
No. 158”). The recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2006. The measurement date provisions are effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2008; however, these provisions have no impact on us as we
currently use a December 31 measurement date for our pension plans. SFAS No. 158 contains a number
of amendments to current accounting for defined benefit plans; however, the primary change is the
requirement to recognize in the balance sheet the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined
benefit plan measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected
benefit obligation. Shareholders’ equity is increased or decreased (through “Other comprehensive
income”) for the overfunded or underfunded status. SFAS No. 158 does not change the determination
of pension plan liabilities or assets, or the income statement recognition of periodic pension
expense. We adopted SFAS No. 158 on December 31, 2006 and retrospective application was not
permitted.
Defined Benefit Plans
We have a U.S. noncontributory defined benefit pension plan which covers certain salaried
employees and a U.S. noncontributory defined benefit pension plan which covers certain hourly
employees, whose initial date of employment is prior to August 1, 2004 (collectively referred to as
our “qualified U.S. plans”). These plans are governed by the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement
Trust (the “Trust”). The benefits from these plans are based primarily on years of service and,
for the salaried plan, employees’ compensation near retirement. These plans qualify under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and our funding policy is consistent
with funding requirements of ERISA and other applicable laws and regulations. We make cash
contributions to the qualified U.S. plans when required. The benefit amount that can be covered by
the qualified U.S. plans is limited under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) of 1986.
Therefore, we maintain an unfunded, nonqualified excess benefit plan designed to maintain benefits
for all employees at the formula level in the qualified U.S. plans. We refer to the qualified U.S.
plans and the excess benefit plan collectively as the “U.S. plans”.
Each of Noble Drilling (Land Support) Limited, Noble Enterprises Limited and Noble Drilling
(Nederland) B.V., all indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Noble, maintains a pension plan which
covers all of its salaried, non-union employees (collectively referred to as our “non-U.S. plans”).
Benefits are based on credited service and employees’ compensation near retirement, as defined by
the plans.
67
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
A reconciliation of the changes in projected benefit obligations (“PBO”) for our non-U.S. and
U.S. plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
88,593 |
|
|
$ |
100,852 |
|
|
$ |
76,562 |
|
|
$ |
104,817 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
6,295 |
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
(13,551 |
) |
|
|
5,678 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
(4,025 |
) |
Plan amendment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
867 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
(2,920 |
) |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
(13,444 |
) |
Plan participants’ contributions |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
(12,458 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
67,517 |
|
|
$ |
116,363 |
|
|
$ |
88,593 |
|
|
$ |
100,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the U.S. plans, the actuarial loss in 2008 is primarily the result of updated actuarial
assumptions. We recognized a curtailment gain in 2008 in conjunction with the sale of our North
Sea labor contract drilling service.
A reconciliation of the changes in fair value of plan assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
$ |
115,732 |
|
|
$ |
116,300 |
|
|
$ |
82,015 |
|
|
$ |
86,382 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
(8,780 |
) |
|
|
(34,473 |
) |
|
|
10,269 |
|
|
|
11,709 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
14,641 |
|
|
|
22,580 |
|
|
|
31,653 |
|
Benefits and expenses paid |
|
|
(2,013 |
) |
|
|
(2,920 |
) |
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
|
|
(13,444 |
) |
Plan participants’ contributions |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign exchange rate changes |
|
|
(16,160 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
$ |
95,932 |
|
|
$ |
93,548 |
|
|
$ |
115,732 |
|
|
$ |
116,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The funded status of the plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
28,415 |
|
|
$ |
(22,815 |
) |
|
$ |
27,139 |
|
|
$ |
15,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (noncurrent) |
|
$ |
29,110 |
|
|
$ |
3,231 |
|
|
$ |
27,167 |
|
|
$ |
24,037 |
|
Other liabilities (current) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Other liabilities (noncurrent) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
(25,788 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(8,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
28,415 |
|
|
$ |
(22,815 |
) |
|
$ |
27,139 |
|
|
$ |
15,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
$ |
6,668 |
|
|
$ |
59,236 |
|
|
$ |
6,742 |
|
|
$ |
10,493 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred income tax asset |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
|
(21,470 |
) |
|
|
(2,126 |
) |
|
|
(4,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
4,915 |
|
|
$ |
39,873 |
|
|
$ |
5,468 |
|
|
$ |
8,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension cost includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
$ |
6,295 |
|
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
|
$ |
3,103 |
|
|
$ |
5,427 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
4,947 |
|
Return on plan assets |
|
|
(6,642 |
) |
|
|
(8,909 |
) |
|
|
(5,251 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(3,598 |
) |
|
|
(5,796 |
) |
Pension obligation
settlement |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Amortization of prior service
cost |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Amortization of transition
obligation |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Recognized net actuarial
loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
Net curtailment (gain) |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension expense |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
4,585 |
|
|
$ |
4,188 |
|
|
$ |
12,948 |
|
|
$ |
3,186 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated prior service cost, transition obligation and net actuarial loss that will be
amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” into net periodic pension cost in 2009 are
$0, $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for non-U.S. plans and $0.3 million, $0 and $4
million, respectively, for U.S. plans.
69
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
In 2007, a pension obligation was paid from the U.S. noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan in a lump-sum cash payment as full settlement of benefits due to a former employee under the
plan.
Defined Benefit Plans — Disaggregated Plan Information
Disaggregated information regarding our non-U.S. and U.S. plans is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
67,517 |
|
|
$ |
116,363 |
|
|
$ |
88,593 |
|
|
$ |
100,852 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
65,281 |
|
|
|
83,892 |
|
|
|
84,003 |
|
|
|
70,275 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
95,932 |
|
|
|
93,548 |
|
|
|
115,732 |
|
|
|
116,300 |
|
The following table provides information related to those plans in which the PBO exceeded the
fair value of the plan assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007. The PBO is the actuarially computed
present value of earned benefits based on service to date and includes the estimated effect of any
future salary increases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
101,138 |
|
|
$ |
3,922 |
|
|
$ |
8,589 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
75,092 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
|
|
— |
|
The PBO for the unfunded excess benefit plan was $6 million and $9 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and is included under “U.S.” in the above tables.
The following table provides information related to those plans in which the accumulated
benefit obligation (“ABO”) exceeded the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The ABO is the actuarially computed present value of earned benefits based on service to date, but
differs from the PBO in that it is based on current salary levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
3,912 |
|
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,438 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
The ABO for the unfunded excess benefit plan was $3 million at both December 31, 2008 and
2007, and is included under “U.S.” in the above tables.
70
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Defined Benefit Plans — Key Assumptions
The key assumptions for the plans are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine
benefit obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.8%-6.7 |
% |
|
|
5.8%-6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.1%-5.3 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to
determine net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.3%-6.70 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5%-6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.8%-6.0 |
% |
|
|
4.5%-5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Expected long-term
return on plan assets |
|
|
4.5%-6.5 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8%-6.5 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8%-6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Rate of compensation
increase |
|
|
3.9%-4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9%-4.2 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
The discount rates used to calculate the net present value of future benefit obligations for
both our U.S. and non-U.S. plans are based on the average of current rates earned on long-term
bonds that receive a Moody’s rating of “Aa” or better. The third-party consultants we employ for
our U.S. and non-U.S. plans have determined that the timing and amount of expected cash outflows on
our plans reasonably matches this index.
We employ third-party consultants for our U.S. and non-U.S. plans that use a portfolio return
model to assess the initial reasonableness of the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.
To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we considered the current level of
expected returns on risk free investments (primarily government bonds), the historical level of
risk premium associated with the other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the
expectations for future returns of each asset class. The expected return for each asset class was
then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return
on assets for the portfolio.
71
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Defined Benefit Plans — Plan Assets
The qualified U.S. plans’ Trust invests in equity securities, fixed income debt securities,
and cash equivalents and other short-term investments. The Trust may invest in these investments
directly or through pooled vehicles, including mutual funds.
The targeted and actual asset allocations by asset category for the qualified U.S. defined
benefit pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Range |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Asset category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
$ |
59,005 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
$ |
78,237 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
31,663 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
35,423 |
|
Cash |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total plan assets |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
93,548 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
116,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any deviation from the target range of asset allocations must be approved by the Trust’s
governing committee. The performance objective of the Trust is to outperform the return of the
Total Index Composite as constructed to reflect the target allocation weightings for each asset
class. This objective should be met over a market cycle, which is defined as a period not less
than three years or more than five years. U.S. equity securities (common stock, convertible
preferred stock and convertible bonds) should achieve a total return (after fees) that exceeds the
total return of an appropriate market index over a full market cycle of three to five years.
Non-U.S. equity securities (common stock, convertible preferred stock and convertible bonds),
either from developed or emerging markets, should achieve a total return (after fees) that exceeds
the total return of an appropriate market index over a full market cycle of three to five years.
Fixed income debt securities should achieve a total return (after fees) that exceeds the total
return of an appropriate market index over a full market cycle of three to five years. Cash
equivalent and short-term investments should achieve relative performance better than the 90-day
Treasury bills. When mutual funds are used by the Trust, those mutual funds should achieve a total
return that equals or exceeds the total return of each fund’s appropriate Lipper or Morningstar
peer category over a full market cycle of three to five years. Lipper and Morningstar are
independent mutual fund rating and information services.
For investments in equity securities, no individual options or financial futures contracts are
purchased unless approved in writing by the Trust’s governing committee. In addition, no private
placements or purchases of venture capital are allowed. The maximum commitment to a particular
industry, as defined by Standard & Poor’s, may not exceed 20 percent. The Trust’s equity managers
vote all proxies in the best interest of the Trust without regards to social issues. The Trust’s
governing committee reserves the right to comment on and exercise control over the response to any
individual proxy solicitation.
For fixed income debt securities, corporate bonds purchased are primarily limited to
investment grade securities as established by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. At no time shall the
lowest investment grade make up more than 20 percent of the total market value of the Trust’s fixed
income holdings. The total fixed income exposure from any single non-government or government
agency issuer shall not exceed 10 percent of the Trust’s fixed income holdings. The average
duration of the total portfolio shall not exceed seven years. All interest and principal receipts
are swept, as received, into an alternative cash management vehicle until reallocated in accordance
with the Trust’s core allocation.
For investments in mutual funds, the assets of the Trust are subject to the guidelines and
limits imposed by such mutual fund’s prospectus and the other governing documentation at the fund
level.
72
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
For investments in cash equivalent and short-term investments, the Trust utilizes a money
market mutual fund which invests in U.S. government and agency obligations, repurchase agreements
collateralized by U.S. government or agency securities, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances,
certificate of deposits, delayed delivery transactions, reverse repurchase agreements, time
deposits and Euro obligations. Bankers’ acceptances shall be made in larger banks (ranked by
assets) rated “Aa” or better by Moody’s and in conformance with all FDIC regulations concerning
capital requirements.
Equity securities include our ordinary shares in the amounts of $2 million (2.6 percent of
total U.S. plan assets) and $6 million (5.3 percent of total U.S. plan assets) at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Our non-U.S. pension plans invest in equity securities, fixed income debt securities, and cash
equivalents and other short-term investments.
The actual asset allocations by asset category for the non-U.S. pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Asset category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
29,043 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
48,435 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
63,393 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
67,232 |
|
Cash |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Other |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total plan assets |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
95,932 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
115,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both the Noble Enterprises Limited and Noble Drilling (Nederland) B.V. pension plans have a
targeted asset allocation of 100 percent debt securities. The investment objective for the Noble
Enterprises Limited plan assets is to earn a favorable return against the Salomon Brothers U.S.
Government Bond Index for all maturities greater than one year. The investment objective for the
Noble Drilling (Nederland) B.V. plan assets is to earn a favorable return against the Salomon
Brothers EMU Government Bond Index for all maturities greater than one year. We evaluate the
performance of these plans on an annual basis.
There is no target asset allocation for the Noble Drilling (Land Support) Limited pension
plan. However, the investment objective of the plan, as adopted by the plan’s trustees, is to
achieve a favorable return against a benchmark of blended United Kingdom market indexes. By
achieving this objective, the trustees believe the plan will be able to avoid significant
volatility in the contribution rate and provide sufficient plan assets to cover the plan’s benefit
obligations were the plan to be liquidated. To achieve these objectives, the trustees have given
the plan’s investment managers full discretion in the day-to-day management of the plan’s assets.
The plan’s assets are divided between two investment managers. The performance objective
communicated to one of these investment managers is to exceed a blend of FTSE UK Gilts index and
Deutsche Börse’s iBoxx Non Gilts index by 1.25 percent per annum. The performance objective
communicated to the other investment manager is to exceed a blend of FTSE’s All Share index, North
America index, Europe index and Pacific Basin index by 1.00 to 2.00 percent per annum. This
investment manager is prohibited by the trustees from investing in real estate. The trustees meet
with the investment managers periodically to review and discuss their investment performance.
73
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
Defined Benefit Plans — Cash Flows
In 2008, we made total contributions of $7 million and $15 million to our non-U.S. and U.S.
pension plans, respectively. In 2007, we made total contributions of $23 million and $32 million
to our non-U.S. and U.S. pension plans, respectively. In 2006, we made total contributions of $10
million to each of our non-U.S. and U.S. pension plans. We expect our aggregate minimum
contributions to our non-U.S. and U.S. plans in 2009, subject to applicable law, to be $6 million.
We continue to monitor and evaluate funding options based upon market conditions and may increase
contributions at our discretion.
In August 2006, U.S. President Bush signed into law the Pension Protection Act of 2006
(“PPA”). The PPA requires that pension plans become fully funded over a seven-year period
beginning in 2008 and increases the amount we are allowed to contribute to our U.S. pension plans
in the near term.
Estimated benefit payments from our U.S. plans are $3 million for 2009, $3 million for 2010,
$4 million for 2011, $4 million for 2012, $5 million for 2013 and $34 million in the aggregate for
the five years thereafter.
Estimated benefit payments from our non-U.S. plans are $.9 million for 2009, $1 million for
2010, $1 million for 2011, $1 million for 2012, $1 million for 2013 and $9 million in the aggregate
for the five years thereafter.
Other Benefit Plans
We sponsor the Restoration Plan, which is a nonqualified, unfunded employee benefit plan under
which certain highly compensated employees may elect to defer compensation in excess of amounts
deferrable under our 401(k) savings plan. The Restoration Plan has no assets, and amounts withheld
for the Restoration Plan are kept by us for general corporate purposes. The investments selected
by employees and associated returns are tracked on a phantom basis. Accordingly, we have a
liability to the employee for amounts originally withheld plus phantom investment income or less
phantom investment losses. We are at risk for phantom investment income and, conversely, benefit
should phantom investment losses occur. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, our liability for the
Restoration Plan was $8 million and $19 million, respectively, and is included in “Accrued payroll
and related costs.”
During 2008, we purchased investments that closely correlate to the investment elections made
by participants in the Restoration Plan in order to mitigate the impact of the investment income
and losses from the Restoration Plan on our consolidated financial statements. The value of these
investments held for our benefit totaled $7 million at
December 31, 2008.
In 2005 we enacted a profit sharing plan, the Noble Drilling Corporation Profit Sharing Plan,
which covers eligible employees, as defined. Participants in the plan become fully vested in the
plan after five years of service, three years beginning in 2007. Profit sharing contributions are
discretionary, require Board of Directors approval and are made in the form of cash. Contributions
recorded related to this plan totaled $2 million, $2 million and $1 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
We sponsor a 401(k) savings plan, a medical plan and other plans for the benefit of our
employees. The cost of maintaining these plans aggregated $37 million, $37 million and $29 million
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We do not provide post-retirement benefits (other than
pensions) or any post-employment benefits to our employees.
74
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 10 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
We periodically enter into derivative instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we may conduct hedging activities in future
periods to mitigate such exposure. We have documented policies and procedures to monitor and
control the use of derivative instruments. We do not engage in derivative transactions for
speculative or trading purposes, nor are we a party to leveraged derivatives.
Hedge effectiveness is measured quarterly based on the relative cumulative changes in fair
value between derivative contracts and the hedged item over time. Any change in fair value
resulting from ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in earnings. We did not recognize any
gain or loss due to hedge ineffectiveness in our Consolidated Statements of Income during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006 related to derivative instruments.
Cash Flow Hedges
Our North Sea operations have a significant amount of their cash operating expenses payable in
either the Euro or British Pound, and we typically maintain forward contracts settling monthly in
Euros and British Pounds. During 2008, we settled all outstanding forward contracts related to our
North Sea operations.
The balance of the net unrealized gain or loss related to our foreign currency forward
contracts and interest rate swaps included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” and related
activity for 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) at beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
$ |
(3,906 |
) |
Activity during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of forward contracts outstanding at
beginning of period |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(2,954 |
) |
|
|
1,397 |
|
Net unrealized gain on outstanding forward contracts |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
Settlement of interest rate swaps |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain at December 31 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hedges
During the third quarter of 2008, we entered into a firm commitment for the construction of a
newbuild drillship. The drillship will be constructed in two phases, with the second phase being
installation and commissioning of the topside equipment. The contract for this second phase of
construction is denominated in Euros, and in order to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates, we entered into forward contracts to purchase Euros. As of December 31,
2008, the aggregate notional amount of the forward contracts was 80 million Euros. Each forward
contract settles in connection with required payments under the construction contract. We are
accounting for these forward contracts as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133”). The fair market value
of those derivative instruments is included in “Other current assets/liabilities” or “Other
assets/liabilities,” depending on when the forward contract is expected to be settled. Gains and
losses from these fair value hedges are recognized in earnings currently along with the change in
fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The fair market value of
these outstanding forward contracts, which are included in “Other current liabilities” and “Other
liabilities,” totaled approximately $5 million at December 31, 2008.
75
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 11 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CREDIT RISK
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
does not require any new fair value measurements. Instead, its application will be made pursuant
to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On February 6, 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157, which
deferred the effective date for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except
those recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. These nonfinancial items include
reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets and
liabilities assumed in a business combination.
We adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities
measured on a recurring basis. There was no impact for the partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 on our
consolidated financial statements. We do not expect the application of SFAS No. 157 to our
nonfinancial assets and liabilities to have any material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of our financial
instruments recognized at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
$ |
7,104 |
|
|
$ |
7,104 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts |
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
|
$ |
2,219 |
|
The derivative instruments have been valued using actively quoted prices and quotes obtained
from the counterparties to the derivative agreements. Our cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and accounts payable are by their nature short-term. As a result, the carrying values
included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to measure eligible assets and
liabilities at fair value. We adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008, and we did not elect
the fair value option for our financial instruments. Accordingly, there was no impact to our
consolidated financial statements as a result of this adoption.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The market for our services is the offshore oil and gas industry, and our customers consist
primarily of government-owned oil companies, major integrated oil companies and independent oil and
gas producers. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require
material collateral. We maintain reserves for potential credit losses when necessary. Our results
of operations and financial condition should be considered in light of the fluctuations in demand
experienced by drilling contractors as changes in oil and gas producers’ expenditures and budgets
occur. These fluctuations can impact our results of operations and financial condition as supply
and demand factors directly affect utilization and dayrates, which are the primary determinants of
our net cash provided by operating activities.
76
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
In 2008, one customer accounted for approximately 20 percent of consolidated operating
revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated operating revenues
in 2008. In 2007, one customer accounted for approximately 15 percent of consolidated operating
revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated operating revenues
in 2007. In 2006, one customer accounted for approximately 12 percent of consolidated operating
revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10 percent of consolidated operating revenues
in 2006.
NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Noble Asset Company Limited (“NACL”), a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of ours, was named
one of 21 parties served a Show Cause Notice (“SCN”) issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.),
Mumbai, India (the “Commissioner”) in August 2003. The SCN concerned alleged violations of Indian
customs laws and regulations regarding one of our jackups. The Commissioner alleged certain
violations to have occurred before, at the time of, and after NACL acquired the rig from the rig’s
previous owner. In the purchase agreement for the rig, NACL received contractual indemnification
against liability for Indian customs duty from the rig’s previous owner. In connection with the
export of the rig from India in 2001, NACL posted a bank guarantee in the amount of 150 million
Indian Rupees (or $3 million at December 31, 2008) and a customs bond in the amount of 970 million
Indian Rupees (or $20 million at December 31, 2008), both of which remain in place. In March 2005,
the Commissioner passed an order against NACL and the other parties cited in the SCN seeking (i) to
invoke the bank guarantee posted on behalf of NACL as a fine, (ii) to demand duty of (a) $19
million plus interest related to a 1997 alleged import and (b) $22 million plus interest related to
a 1999 alleged import, provided that the duty and interest demanded in (b) would not be payable if
the duty and interest demanded in (a) were paid by NACL, and (iii) to assess a penalty of $500,000
against NACL. NACL appealed the order of the Commissioner to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal (“CESTAT”). At a hearing on April 5, 2006, CESTAT upheld NACL’s appeal and
overturned the Commissioner’s March 2005 order against NACL in its entirety. CESTAT thereafter
issued its written judgment dated August 8, 2006 upholding NACL’s appeal on all grounds and setting
aside the duty demand, interest, fine and penalty. The Commissioner filed an appeal in the Bombay
High Court challenging the order passed by CESTAT. In August 2008, the Division Bench of the
Bombay High Court dismissed the Commissioner’s appeal of
CESTAT’s order. The Commissioner has filed a Special Leave
Petition, an Appeal in the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi,
appealing the August 2008 order of the Bombay High Court. NACL is seeking the
return or cancellation of its previously posted custom bond and bank
guarantee and the application for return of the customs bond and bank
guarantee is pending final hearing before CESTAT. NACL continues to pursue contractual indemnification against liability for Indian
customs duty and related costs and expenses against the rig’s previous owner in arbitration
proceedings in London, which proceedings the parties have temporarily stayed pending further
developments in the Indian proceeding. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of this matter
will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We operate in a number of countries throughout the world and our income tax returns filed in
those jurisdictions are subject to review and examination by tax authorities within those
jurisdictions. We are currently contesting several tax assessments and may contest future
assessments when we believe the assessments are in error. We cannot predict or provide assurance
as to the ultimate outcome of the existing or future assessments. We believe the ultimate
resolution of the outstanding assessments, for which we have not made any accrual, will not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. We recognize uncertain tax
positions that we believe have a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being sustained. See Note 8
for additional information.
Certain of our non-U.S. income tax returns have been examined for the 2002 through 2004
periods and audit claims have been assessed for approximately $120 million (including interest and
penalties), primarily in Mexico. We do not believe we owe these amounts and are defending our
position. However, we expect increased audit activity in Mexico and anticipate the tax authorities
will issue additional assessments and continue to pursue legal actions for all audit claims. We
believe audit claims of an additional $13 million to $15 million attributable to other business tax
returns may be assessed against us. We have contested, or intend to contest, most of the audit
findings, including through litigation if necessary, and we do not believe that there is greater
than 50 percent likelihood that additional taxes will be incurred. Accordingly, no accrual has
been made for such amounts.
77
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits that are incidental to our operations in
which the claimants seek an unspecified amount of monetary damages for personal injury, including
injuries purportedly
resulting from exposure to asbestos on drilling rigs and associated facilities. At January
31, 2009, there were approximately 39 of these lawsuits in which we are one of many defendants.
These lawsuits have been filed in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. Exposure related
to these lawsuits is not currently determinable. We intend to defend vigorously against the
litigation.
We are a defendant in certain claims and litigation arising out of operations in the ordinary
course of business, the resolution of which, in the opinion of management, will not be material to
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, our Nigerian subsidiary received letters from the Nigerian
Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (“NIMASA”) seeking to collect a two percent surcharge on
contract amounts under contracts performed by “vessels”, within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage
laws, engaged in the Nigerian coastal shipping trade. Although we do
not believe that these laws apply to our ownership of drilling units, NIMASA is seeking to apply a provision of the
Nigerian cabotage laws (which became effective on May 1, 2004) to our offshore drilling units by
considering these units to be “vessels” within the meaning of those laws and therefore subject to
the surcharge, which is imposed only upon “vessels”. We
also have been informed that NIMASA has recently filed suit against
us in the Federal High Court of Nigeria seeking collection of this
surcharge. Our offshore drilling units are not engaged
in the Nigerian coastal shipping trade and are not in our view “vessels” within the meaning of
Nigeria’s cabotage laws. In January 2008, we filed an originating summons against NIMASA and the
Minister of Transportation in the Federal High Court of Lagos, Nigeria seeking, among other things,
a declaration that our drilling operations do not constitute “coastal trade” or “cabotage” within
the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws and that our offshore drilling units are not “vessels”
within the meaning of those laws. NIMASA and the Minister of Transportation filed a preliminary
objection to our originating summons and the proceeding. In October 2008, the High Court dismissed
the objection as being without merit and a hearing on our originating summons is scheduled for
April 2009. We intend to take all further appropriate legal action to resist the application of
Nigeria’s cabotage laws to our drilling units. The outcome of any such legal action and the extent
to which we may ultimately be responsible for the surcharge is uncertain. If it is ultimately
determined that offshore drilling units constitute vessels within the meaning of the Nigerian
cabotage laws, we may be required to pay the surcharge and comply with other aspects of the
Nigerian cabotage laws, which could adversely affect our operations in Nigerian waters and require
us to incur additional costs of compliance.
We maintain certain insurance coverage against specified marine liabilities, including
liability for physical damage to our drilling rigs, and loss of hire on certain of our rigs. Our
March 2008 insurance program renewal included an annual aggregate coverage limit of $200 million
applicable to our drilling units operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for physical damage and loss
of hire on certain units resulting from named windstorm perils. We believe that damage caused in
2008 by Hurricane Ike to oil and gas assets situated in the U.S. Gulf
of Mexico has caused the energy insurance markets to deteriorate,
resulting in more restricted and more expensive coverage. We may
decide to self insure for U.S. named windstorm perils. This self insurance
would not apply to our units in the Mexican portion of the Gulf of Mexico. We presently have five
semisubmersibles and three submersibles in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
We also expect to assume generally higher deductibles for our other
insurance coverage. We currently have a $10
million deductible on our marine hull and machinery coverage, and loss of hire coverage is subject
to a 60-day waiting period deductible for named U.S. Gulf of Mexico windstorms and a 45-day waiting
period for all other perils.
Although we maintain insurance in the geographic areas in which we operate, pollution,
reservoir damage and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Our insurance policies
and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover our losses or may have exclusions of
coverage for some losses. We do not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all risks,
including loss of hire insurance on most of the rigs in our fleet. Uninsured exposures may include
war risk, activities prohibited by U.S. laws and regulations, radiation hazards, certain loss or
damage to property on board our rigs and losses relating to terrorist acts or strikes. If a
significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or contractual
indemnity, it could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
There can be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify us will
necessarily be financially able to indemnify us against all these risks.
78
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
We carry protection and indemnity insurance covering marine third party liability exposures,
which also includes coverage for employer’s liability resulting from personal injury to our
offshore drilling crews. Our protection and indemnity policy
currently has a standard deductible of $1
million per occurrence, and we retain $5 million of
claims in the aggregate beyond the standard deductible.
In connection with our capital expenditure program, we have entered into certain commitments,
including shipyard and purchase commitments of approximately $1.2 billion at December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2008, we had certain noncancelable, long-term operating leases, principally
for office space and facilities, with various expiration dates. Future minimum rentals under these
leases aggregate $8 million for 2009, $6 million for 2010, $3 million for 2011, $.5 million for
2012, $.2 million for 2013, and $4 million thereafter. Rental expense for all operating leases was
$10 million, $9 million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
We have entered into employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, as well as
certain other employees. These agreements become effective upon a change of control of Noble
(within the meaning set forth in the agreements) or a termination of employment in connection with
or in anticipation of a change of control, and remain effective for three years thereafter. These
agreements provide for compensation and certain other benefits under such circumstances.
Internal Investigation
In June 2007, we announced that we were conducting an internal investigation of our Nigerian
operations, focusing on the legality under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as
amended (the “FCPA”), and local laws of our Nigerian affiliate’s reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by our customs agents in connection with obtaining and renewing permits for the temporary
importation of drilling units and related equipment into Nigerian waters, including permits that
are necessary for our drilling units to operate in Nigerian waters. We also announced that the
audit committee of our Board of Directors had engaged a leading law firm with significant
experience in investigating and advising on FCPA matters to lead the investigation as independent
outside counsel. The scope of the investigation also includes our dealings with customs agents and
customs authorities in certain parts of the world other than Nigeria in which we conduct our
operations, as well as dealings with other types of local agents in Nigeria and such other parts of
the world. There can be no assurance that evidence of additional potential FCPA violations may not
be uncovered through the investigation.
The audit committee commissioned the internal investigation after our management brought to
the attention of the audit committee a news release issued by another company. The news release
disclosed that the other company was conducting an internal investigation into the FCPA
implications of certain actions by a customs agent in Nigeria in connection with the temporary
importation of that company’s vessels into Nigeria. Our drilling units that conduct operations in
Nigeria do so under temporary import permits, and management considered it prudent to review our
own practices in this regard.
We voluntarily contacted the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to advise them
that an independent investigation was underway. We have been cooperating, and intend to continue
to cooperate fully with both agencies. If the SEC or the DOJ determines that violations of the
FCPA have occurred, they could seek civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties,
against us and/or certain of our employees, as well as additional changes to our business practices
and compliance programs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business or
financial condition. In addition, such actions, whether actual or alleged, could damage our
reputation and ability to do business, to attract and retain employees, and to access capital
markets. Further, detecting, investigating, and resolving such actions is expensive and consumes
significant time and attention of our senior management.
The independent outside counsel appointed by the audit committee to perform the internal
investigation made a presentation of the results of its investigation to the DOJ and the SEC in
June 2008. The SEC and the DOJ have begun to review these results and information gathered by the
independent outside counsel in the course of the investigation. Neither the SEC nor the DOJ has
indicated what action it may take, if any, against us or any individual, or whether it may request
that the audit committee’s independent outside counsel conduct further investigation. Therefore,
we consider the internal investigation to be
79
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
ongoing
and cannot predict when it will conclude. Furthermore, we cannot predict whether either the SEC or the DOJ will open its own
proceeding to investigate this matter, or if a proceeding is opened, what potential remedies these
agencies may seek. We could also face fines or sanctions in relevant foreign jurisdictions. Based
on information obtained to date in our internal investigation, we have not determined that any
potential liability that may result is probable or remote or can be reasonably estimated. As a
result, we have not made any accrual in our consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2008.
We are currently operating two jackup rigs offshore Nigeria. The temporary import permits
covering the rigs expired in November 2008 and we have pending applications to renew these permits.
However, as of February 25, 2009, the Nigerian customs office had not acted on our applications.
We continue to seek to avoid material disruption to our Nigerian operations; however, there can be
no assurance that we will be able to obtain new permits or further extensions of permits necessary
to continue the operation of our rigs in Nigeria. If we cannot obtain a new permit or an extension
necessary to continue operations of any rig, we may need to cease operations under the drilling
contract for such rig and relocate such rig from Nigerian waters. In any case, we also could be
subject to actions by Nigerian customs for import duties and fines for these two rigs, as well as
other drilling rigs that operated in Nigeria in the past. We cannot predict what impact these
events may have on any such contract or our business in Nigeria. Furthermore, we cannot predict
what changes, if any, relating to temporary import permit policies and procedures may be
established or implemented in Nigeria in the future, or how any such changes may impact our
business there.
Notwithstanding that the internal investigation is ongoing, we concluded that certain changes
to our FCPA compliance program would provide us greater assurance that our assets are not used,
directly or indirectly, to make improper payments, including customs payments, and that we are in
compliance with the FCPA’s record-keeping requirements. Although we have had a long-standing
published policy requiring compliance with the FCPA and broadly prohibiting any improper payments
by us to foreign or U.S. officials, we adopted additional measures intended to enhance FCPA
compliance procedures. Further measures may be required once the investigation concludes.
For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we incurred legal fees and related costs of $13
million and $15 million, respectively, related to the internal investigation. It is anticipated
that additional costs will be incurred in future periods, but the amount of these costs cannot be
presently determined.
NOTE 13 — HURRICANE LOSSES AND RECOVERIES
On September 12, 2008, Hurricane Ike passed through the oil and gas fields of the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico causing damage to certain of our rigs. The $200 million aggregate insurance limit available
to our rigs operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was sufficient to cover the loss, with the
exception of the physical damage deductible and the loss of hire waiting period. During 2008, we
recorded a charge of $10 million, which represents our deductible under our insurance program. Our
insurance receivables at December 31, 2008 related to claims for hurricane damage were $14 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we recognized a net recovery of $5 million for physical
damage and loss of hire insurance claims for damage caused by the Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in
2005. This recovery was partially offset by an additional claim loss of $2 million earlier in
2007, the net effect of which is reflected in “Hurricane losses and recoveries, net” in our
Consolidated Statements of Income. Our insurance receivables at December 31, 2007 relating to
claims for hurricane damage were $39 million, which we received during the first quarter of 2008 as
final settlement of all remaining hurricane-related claims and receivables for physical damage and
loss of hire for Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $11 million in loss of hire insurance
proceeds for two of our units that suffered downtime attributable to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
80
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 14 — INTERESTS IN DEEPWATER OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
In 2000, we received interests in several deepwater oil and gas properties from Mariner Energy
Inc. and Samedan Oil Corporation pursuant to the settlements of a lawsuit with Mariner Energy and
Samedan over employment of the Noble Homer Ferrington semisubmersible and upon entering into a
long-term contract with each of these companies for use of the unit in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. We
reported “Other Income” from such properties of $4 million in 2006.
81
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 15 — SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION
We report our contract drilling operations as a single reportable segment: Contract Drilling
Services. The consolidation of our contract drilling operations into one reportable segment is
attributable to how we manage our business, and the fact that all of our drilling fleet is
dependent upon the worldwide oil industry. The mobile offshore drilling units comprising our
offshore rig fleet operate in a single, global market for contract drilling services and are often
redeployed globally due to changing demands of our customers, which consist largely of major
non-U.S. and government owned/controlled oil and gas companies throughout the world. Our contract
drilling services segment conducts contract drilling operations in the Middle East, India, U.S.
Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, the North Sea, Brazil and West Africa.
The accounting policies of our reportable segment are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1). We evaluate the performance of our
operating segment based on revenues from external customers and segment profit. Summarized
financial information of our reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006 is shown in the following table. The “Other” column includes results of labor contract
drilling services, engineering and consulting services, other insignificant operations and
corporate related items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Drilling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
3,376,224 |
|
|
$ |
70,277 |
|
|
$ |
3,446,501 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
349,448 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
356,658 |
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
1,867,262 |
|
|
|
41,141 |
|
|
|
1,908,403 |
|
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
350,305 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
351,463 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
1,519,980 |
|
|
|
41,015 |
|
|
|
1,560,995 |
|
Total assets (at end of period) |
|
|
6,530,098 |
|
|
|
572,233 |
|
|
|
7,102,331 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,183,138 |
|
|
|
48,184 |
|
|
|
1,231,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
2,799,520 |
|
|
$ |
195,791 |
|
|
$ |
2,995,311 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
283,225 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
292,987 |
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
1,485,101 |
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
1,490,862 |
|
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized |
|
|
4,484 |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
13,111 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
287,128 |
|
|
|
(4,237 |
) |
|
|
282,891 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
1,194,826 |
|
|
|
11,185 |
|
|
|
1,206,011 |
|
Total assets (at end of period) |
|
|
5,514,337 |
|
|
|
361,669 |
|
|
|
5,876,006 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,222,360 |
|
|
|
64,683 |
|
|
|
1,287,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
1,956,508 |
|
|
$ |
143,731 |
|
|
$ |
2,100,239 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
248,800 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
|
|
253,325 |
|
Segment operating income |
|
|
923,004 |
|
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
|
927,430 |
|
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized |
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
12,101 |
|
|
|
16,167 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
187,428 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
189,421 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
732,191 |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
731,866 |
|
Total assets (at end of period) |
|
|
4,139,945 |
|
|
|
445,969 |
|
|
|
4,585,914 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,035,449 |
|
|
|
86,612 |
|
|
|
1,122,061 |
|
82
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
The following table presents revenues and identifiable assets by country based on the location
of the service provided:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Identifiable Assets |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
676,225 |
|
|
$ |
671,482 |
|
|
$ |
557,851 |
|
|
$ |
2,045,968 |
|
|
$ |
1,963,608 |
|
|
$ |
1,571,887 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
268,778 |
|
|
|
221,498 |
|
|
|
174,430 |
|
|
|
843,987 |
|
|
|
582,480 |
|
|
|
608,184 |
|
Canada |
|
|
37,953 |
|
|
|
36,039 |
|
|
|
34,026 |
|
|
|
21,040 |
|
|
|
22,613 |
|
|
|
20,562 |
|
China (1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
797,854 |
|
|
|
646,995 |
|
|
|
530,038 |
|
Denmark |
|
|
69,417 |
|
|
|
72,650 |
|
|
|
27,947 |
|
|
|
24,377 |
|
|
|
41,662 |
|
|
|
41,760 |
|
Equatorial Guinea |
|
|
115,669 |
|
|
|
30,693 |
|
|
|
10,719 |
|
|
|
257,087 |
|
|
|
31,727 |
|
|
|
28,065 |
|
India |
|
|
80,669 |
|
|
|
76,209 |
|
|
|
40,147 |
|
|
|
107,911 |
|
|
|
83,576 |
|
|
|
70,066 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
678,001 |
|
|
|
452,161 |
|
|
|
269,172 |
|
|
|
823,462 |
|
|
|
410,645 |
|
|
|
289,072 |
|
Nigeria |
|
|
304,844 |
|
|
|
402,130 |
|
|
|
272,961 |
|
|
|
136,545 |
|
|
|
417,647 |
|
|
|
366,960 |
|
Qatar |
|
|
438,754 |
|
|
|
322,708 |
|
|
|
212,227 |
|
|
|
481,724 |
|
|
|
472,679 |
|
|
|
358,313 |
|
Singapore (1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
905,107 |
|
|
|
467,678 |
|
|
|
175,926 |
|
The Netherlands |
|
|
303,313 |
|
|
|
235,595 |
|
|
|
169,003 |
|
|
|
69,837 |
|
|
|
98,233 |
|
|
|
136,360 |
|
United Arab Emirates |
|
|
186,601 |
|
|
|
144,444 |
|
|
|
108,226 |
|
|
|
243,640 |
|
|
|
351,989 |
|
|
|
201,522 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
285,902 |
|
|
|
329,702 |
|
|
|
211,412 |
|
|
|
343,792 |
|
|
|
284,474 |
|
|
|
177,917 |
|
Other |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
12,118 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,446,501 |
|
|
$ |
2,995,311 |
|
|
$ |
2,100,239 |
|
|
$ |
7,102,331 |
|
|
$ |
5,876,006 |
|
|
$ |
4,585,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
China and Singapore consist of asset values for newbuild rigs under construction in
shipyards. |
NOTE 16 — ASSET DISPOSALS
During the second quarter of 2008, we sold our North Sea labor contract drilling services
business to Seawell Holding UK Limited (“Seawell”) for $35 million plus working capital. This sale
included labor contracts covering 11 platform operations in the United Kingdom sector of the North
Sea. In connection with this sale, we recognized a gain of $36 million, net of closing costs.
This gain included approximately $5 million in cumulative currency translation adjustments.
83
NOBLE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share amounts.)
NOTE 17 — UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA
Unaudited interim consolidated financial information for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
861,425 |
|
|
$ |
812,941 |
|
|
$ |
861,981 |
|
|
$ |
910,154 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
466,503 |
|
|
|
460,145 |
|
|
|
467,650 |
|
|
|
514,105 |
|
Net income |
|
|
384,188 |
|
|
|
375,718 |
|
|
|
382,522 |
|
|
|
418,567 |
|
Net income per share (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
646,424 |
|
|
$ |
725,999 |
|
|
$ |
791,276 |
|
|
$ |
831,612 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
311,301 |
|
|
|
361,007 |
|
|
|
393,719 |
|
|
|
424,835 |
|
Net income |
|
|
250,320 |
|
|
|
290,031 |
|
|
|
318,280 |
|
|
|
347,380 |
|
Net income per share (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented.
Therefore, the sum of the quarters’ net income per share may not agree to the total computed
for the year. |
NOTE 18 — GUARANTEES OF REGISTERED SECURITIES
Noble and Noble Holding (U.S.) Corporation (“NHC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Noble, are
guarantors for certain debt securities issued by Noble Drilling Corporation (“Noble Drilling”).
These debt securities consist of Noble Drilling’s 6.95% Senior Notes due 2009 and its 7.50% Senior
Notes due 2019. The outstanding principal balances of the 6.95% Senior Notes and the 7.50% Senior
Notes at December 31, 2008 were $150 million and $202 million, respectively. Noble Drilling is an
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Noble and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of NHC. Noble’s
and NHC’s guarantees of the 6.95% Senior Notes and the 7.50% Senior Notes are full and
unconditional. In December 2005, Noble Drilling Holding LLC (“NDH”), an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Noble, became a co-obligor on (and effectively a guarantor of) the 6.95% Senior Notes
and the 7.50% Senior Notes.
In connection with the issuance of Noble’s 5.875% Senior Notes, Noble Drilling guaranteed the
payment of the 5.875% Senior Notes. Noble Drilling’s guarantee of the 5.875% Senior Notes is full
and unconditional. The outstanding principal balance of the 5.875% Senior Notes at December 31,
2008 was $300 million.
In November 2008, Noble Holding International Limited (“NHIL”), our indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary issued $250 million principal amount of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2014, which are fully
and unconditionally guaranteed by Noble. The outstanding principal balance of the 7.375% Senior
Notes at December 31, 2008 was $249 million.
The following consolidating financial statements of Noble, NHC and NDH combined, Noble
Drilling, NHIL and all other subsidiaries present investments in both consolidated and
unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method of accounting.
84
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
512,179 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
513,311 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
13,099 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
605,137 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
644,840 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,207 |
|
Accounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
32,807 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
562,679 |
|
|
|
247,174 |
|
|
|
961,230 |
|
|
|
(1,803,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
121,008 |
|
|
|
(83,712 |
) |
|
|
47,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
40,863 |
|
|
|
30,542 |
|
|
|
575,813 |
|
|
|
247,174 |
|
|
|
2,233,551 |
|
|
|
(1,887,602 |
) |
|
|
1,240,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling equipment and facilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,864,430 |
|
|
|
116,995 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,442,015 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,423,440 |
|
Other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
105,115 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
105,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,864,655 |
|
|
|
116,995 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,547,130 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,528,780 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(113,481 |
) |
|
|
(70,326 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,702,424 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,886,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,751,174 |
|
|
|
46,669 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,844,706 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,642,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM AFFILIATES |
|
|
511,835 |
|
|
|
20,963 |
|
|
|
44,159 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,757,321 |
|
|
|
(2,334,278 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES |
|
|
5,498,928 |
|
|
|
6,806,209 |
|
|
|
3,460,873 |
|
|
|
2,727,556 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,493,566 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
10,117 |
|
|
|
6,418 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
197,932 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
219,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,054,583 |
|
|
$ |
8,619,005 |
|
|
$ |
4,133,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,976,747 |
|
|
$ |
8,033,510 |
|
|
$ |
(22,715,446 |
) |
|
$ |
7,102,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
21,066 |
|
|
$ |
149,998 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
22,700 |
|
|
$ |
(21,066 |
) |
|
$ |
172,698 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
242,291 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
259,107 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
17,416 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,133 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,449 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
96,730 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
107,211 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
10,036 |
|
|
|
38,735 |
|
|
|
22,798 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(62,646 |
) |
|
|
11,325 |
|
Accounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,642,231 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
161,659 |
|
|
|
(1,803,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,090 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
53,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
27,452 |
|
|
|
1,721,094 |
|
|
|
190,966 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
625,008 |
|
|
|
(1,887,602 |
) |
|
|
678,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
299,837 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
201,695 |
|
|
|
249,257 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
750,789 |
|
NOTES PAYABLE TO AFFILIATES |
|
|
429,900 |
|
|
|
1,207,421 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
576,957 |
|
|
|
(2,334,278 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,977 |
|
|
|
15,160 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
240,881 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
265,018 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
6,679 |
|
|
|
33,543 |
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
74,828 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
121,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
763,868 |
|
|
|
2,971,035 |
|
|
|
534,055 |
|
|
|
251,332 |
|
|
|
1,517,674 |
|
|
|
(4,221,880 |
) |
|
|
1,816,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares-par value $0.10 per share |
|
|
26,190 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,190 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
402,115 |
|
|
|
1,279,983 |
|
|
|
870,744 |
|
|
|
406,998 |
|
|
|
1,275,618 |
|
|
|
(3,833,343 |
) |
|
|
402,115 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
4,919,667 |
|
|
|
4,367,987 |
|
|
|
2,728,073 |
|
|
|
2,318,417 |
|
|
|
5,301,943 |
|
|
|
(14,716,420 |
) |
|
|
4,919,667 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
(57,257 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(57,257 |
) |
|
|
56,197 |
|
|
|
(57,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,290,715 |
|
|
|
5,647,970 |
|
|
|
3,599,877 |
|
|
|
2,725,415 |
|
|
|
6,520,304 |
|
|
|
(18,493,566 |
) |
|
|
5,290,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,054,583 |
|
|
$ |
8,619,005 |
|
|
$ |
4,133,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,976,747 |
|
|
$ |
8,033,510 |
|
|
$ |
(22,715,446 |
) |
|
$ |
7,102,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,544 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
148,441 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
161,058 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
580,516 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
613,115 |
|
Insurance receivables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,066 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,066 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19,781 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,721 |
|
Accounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
419,197 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
576,239 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
176,376 |
|
|
|
(1,171,812 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
65,154 |
|
|
|
(42,692 |
) |
|
|
26,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
435,215 |
|
|
|
23,918 |
|
|
|
586,228 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,029,334 |
|
|
|
(1,214,504 |
) |
|
|
860,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling equipment and facilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,665,102 |
|
|
|
111,089 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,578,591 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,354,782 |
|
Other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
79,999 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
80,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,665,272 |
|
|
|
111,089 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,658,590 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,434,951 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(82,964 |
) |
|
|
(64,947 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,491,124 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,639,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,582,308 |
|
|
|
46,142 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,167,466 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,795,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM AFFILIATES |
|
|
511,835 |
|
|
|
20,963 |
|
|
|
44,159 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,462,786 |
|
|
|
(2,039,743 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES |
|
|
3,881,341 |
|
|
|
4,906,292 |
|
|
|
3,010,249 |
|
|
|
1,722,781 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13,520,663 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
205,433 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
219,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,832,057 |
|
|
$ |
6,540,328 |
|
|
$ |
3,690,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,781 |
|
|
$ |
5,865,019 |
|
|
$ |
(16,774,910 |
) |
|
$ |
5,876,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
25,886 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
10,334 |
|
|
$ |
(25,886 |
) |
|
$ |
10,334 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
|
4,778 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
188,077 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
198,395 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
13,131 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
102,362 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,914 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
83,527 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
85,641 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(16,806 |
) |
|
|
9,951 |
|
Accounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,171,782 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,171,812 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
72,047 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
72,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
1,212,593 |
|
|
|
33,596 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
456,935 |
|
|
|
(1,214,504 |
) |
|
|
492,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
399,800 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
351,682 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
774,182 |
|
NOTES PAYABLE TO AFFILIATES |
|
|
114,300 |
|
|
|
1,228,486 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
576,957 |
|
|
|
(2,039,743 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
12,496 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
223,330 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
240,621 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
23,266 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,237 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
65,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,735 |
|
|
|
2,469,140 |
|
|
|
519,463 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,315,159 |
|
|
|
(3,254,247 |
) |
|
|
1,573,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,596 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares-par value $0.10 per share |
|
|
26,822 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,822 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
683,697 |
|
|
|
1,279,983 |
|
|
|
870,744 |
|
|
|
406,998 |
|
|
|
792,675 |
|
|
|
(3,350,400 |
) |
|
|
683,697 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
3,602,870 |
|
|
|
2,791,205 |
|
|
|
2,301,199 |
|
|
|
1,315,753 |
|
|
|
3,767,848 |
|
|
|
(10,176,005 |
) |
|
|
3,602,870 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
(5,067 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,067 |
) |
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
(5,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,308,322 |
|
|
|
4,071,188 |
|
|
|
3,171,268 |
|
|
|
1,722,751 |
|
|
|
4,555,456 |
|
|
|
(13,520,663 |
) |
|
|
4,308,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,832,057 |
|
|
$ |
6,540,328 |
|
|
$ |
3,690,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,781 |
|
|
$ |
5,865,019 |
|
|
$ |
(16,774,910 |
) |
|
$ |
5,876,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
251,285 |
|
|
$ |
46,742 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
3,101,523 |
|
|
$ |
(100,700 |
) |
|
$ |
3,298,850 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
88,934 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
90,849 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
55,078 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
55,078 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
252,978 |
|
|
|
46,957 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,247,266 |
|
|
|
(100,700 |
) |
|
|
3,446,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
|
22,789 |
|
|
|
38,014 |
|
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,032,633 |
|
|
|
(100,700 |
) |
|
|
1,011,882 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
77,905 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
79,327 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
42,573 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
42,573 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
34,025 |
|
|
|
6,947 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
315,686 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
356,658 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
9,713 |
|
|
|
5,886 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
56,994 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
74,143 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,502 |
|
|
|
79,152 |
|
|
|
27,787 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,499,306 |
|
|
|
(100,700 |
) |
|
|
1,538,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(32,502 |
) |
|
|
173,826 |
|
|
|
19,170 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
1,747,960 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,908,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
|
|
1,617,587 |
|
|
|
1,465,802 |
|
|
|
452,252 |
|
|
|
1,004,775 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,540,416 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(31,071 |
) |
|
|
(71,199 |
) |
|
|
(25,552 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
36,904 |
|
|
|
88,590 |
|
|
|
(4,388 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
8,732 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
85,873 |
|
|
|
(88,590 |
) |
|
|
8,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,562,746 |
|
|
|
1,570,857 |
|
|
|
445,870 |
|
|
|
1,002,664 |
|
|
|
1,870,737 |
|
|
|
(4,540,416 |
) |
|
|
1,912,458 |
|
INCOME TAX (PROVISION) BENEFIT |
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
(18,996 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(338,996 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(351,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,137 |
|
|
$ |
426,874 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,531,741 |
|
|
$ |
(4,540,416 |
) |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
172,992 |
|
|
$ |
59,364 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
2,558,101 |
|
|
$ |
(76,207 |
) |
|
$ |
2,714,250 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
119,728 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
121,241 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
156,508 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
156,508 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
173,679 |
|
|
|
60,196 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,837,643 |
|
|
|
(76,207 |
) |
|
|
2,995,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
|
20,939 |
|
|
|
31,003 |
|
|
|
28,070 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
876,222 |
|
|
|
(76,207 |
) |
|
|
880,049 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
104,551 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
105,952 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
125,624 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
125,624 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,120 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,520 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,968 |
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
261,409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
292,987 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
13,893 |
|
|
|
4,059 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
66,590 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
85,831 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,832 |
|
|
|
61,612 |
|
|
|
36,188 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,448,002 |
|
|
|
(76,207 |
) |
|
|
1,504,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(34,832 |
) |
|
|
112,067 |
|
|
|
24,008 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1,389,641 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,490,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
|
|
1,313,963 |
|
|
|
1,162,384 |
|
|
|
574,976 |
|
|
|
759,668 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,810,991 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(82,605 |
) |
|
|
(45,873 |
) |
|
|
(25,552 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,613 |
|
|
|
103,306 |
|
|
|
(13,111 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
8,061 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
106,594 |
|
|
|
(103,306 |
) |
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,204,587 |
|
|
|
1,228,383 |
|
|
|
573,429 |
|
|
|
759,646 |
|
|
|
1,533,848 |
|
|
|
(3,810,991 |
) |
|
|
1,488,902 |
|
INCOME TAX (PROVISION) BENEFIT |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
15,617 |
|
|
|
(28,075 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(271,857 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(282,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,244,000 |
|
|
$ |
545,354 |
|
|
$ |
759,646 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,991 |
|
|
$ |
(3,810,991 |
) |
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2006
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
99,230 |
|
|
$ |
41,996 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
1,802,875 |
|
|
$ |
(57,114 |
) |
|
$ |
1,886,987 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
91,404 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
92,354 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
111,201 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
111,201 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,628 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
99,839 |
|
|
|
42,406 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,015,108 |
|
|
|
(57,114 |
) |
|
|
2,100,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract drilling services |
|
|
15,674 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
704,269 |
|
|
|
(57,114 |
) |
|
|
696,264 |
|
Reimbursables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
78,692 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
79,520 |
|
Labor contract drilling services |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
91,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
91,353 |
|
Engineering, consulting and other |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
223,060 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
253,325 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
5,639 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,906 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
46,272 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,313 |
|
|
|
46,881 |
|
|
|
20,368 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,141,355 |
|
|
|
(57,114 |
) |
|
|
1,172,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(21,313 |
) |
|
|
52,958 |
|
|
|
22,038 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
873,753 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
927,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
|
|
791,824 |
|
|
|
724,042 |
|
|
|
363,664 |
|
|
|
404,821 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,284,351 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(22,109 |
) |
|
|
(57,650 |
) |
|
|
(38,891 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
53,652 |
|
|
|
48,838 |
|
|
|
(16,167 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
(11,258 |
) |
|
|
(3,043 |
) |
|
|
11,210 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61,953 |
|
|
|
(48,838 |
) |
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
737,144 |
|
|
|
716,307 |
|
|
|
358,021 |
|
|
|
404,808 |
|
|
|
989,358 |
|
|
|
(2,284,351 |
) |
|
|
921,287 |
|
INCOME TAX (PROVISION) BENEFIT |
|
|
(5,278 |
) |
|
|
15,296 |
|
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(205,336 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(189,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
$ |
731,603 |
|
|
$ |
363,918 |
|
|
$ |
404,808 |
|
|
$ |
784,022 |
|
|
$ |
(2,284,351 |
) |
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,137 |
|
|
$ |
426,874 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,664 |
|
|
$ |
1,531,741 |
|
|
$ |
(4,540,416 |
) |
|
$ |
1,560,995 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
34,025 |
|
|
|
6,947 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
315,686 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
356,658 |
|
Impairment loss on assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,362 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,026 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,899 |
|
Equity earnings in affiliates |
|
|
(1,617,587 |
) |
|
|
(1,465,802 |
) |
|
|
(452,252 |
) |
|
|
(1,004,775 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,540,416 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension contribution |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,439 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,439 |
) |
Gain on disposal of assets, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(36,485 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
(2,017 |
) |
|
|
(10,405 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
Other changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(24,621 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(31,725 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(3,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(12,045 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,237 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(4,008 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
23,330 |
|
|
|
42,168 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
|
|
(88,771 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(19,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
189,669 |
|
|
|
(8,030 |
) |
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
1,708,015 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,888,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New construction |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(799,736 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(799,736 |
) |
Other capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,906 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(318,049 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(323,955 |
) |
Major maintenance expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,444 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(104,186 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(107,630 |
) |
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,830 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
40,830 |
|
Repayments of notes from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,065 |
|
|
|
(21,065 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(315,600 |
) |
|
|
315,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Hurricane insurance receivables |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,747 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,747 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,451 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(799,736 |
) |
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(614,742 |
) |
|
|
294,535 |
|
|
|
(1,129,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on bank credit facilities |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Payments on bank credit facilities |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
Payments of other long-term debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
Advances (to)/from affiliates |
|
|
317,475 |
|
|
|
631,577 |
|
|
|
17,333 |
|
|
|
(247,185 |
) |
|
|
(719,200 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
315,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(315,600 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Repayments of notes to affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,065 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,065 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Capital contributions from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net proceeds from employee stock transactions |
|
|
9,304 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,304 |
|
Tax benefit of employee stock transactions |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249,238 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249,238 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(244,198 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(244,198 |
) |
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(314,122 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(314,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
(12,474 |
) |
|
|
610,512 |
|
|
|
17,333 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
(729,535 |
) |
|
|
(294,535 |
) |
|
|
(406,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(11,883 |
) |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
363,738 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
352,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
12,544 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
148,441 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
161,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
512,179 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
513,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
|
$ |
1,244,000 |
|
|
$ |
545,354 |
|
|
$ |
759,646 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,991 |
|
|
$ |
(3,810,991 |
) |
|
$ |
1,206,011 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,968 |
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
261,409 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
292,987 |
|
Impairment loss on assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,789 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,514 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,358 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,509 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
34,681 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
34,681 |
|
Equity earnings in affiliates |
|
|
(1,313,963 |
) |
|
|
(1,162,384 |
) |
|
|
(574,976 |
) |
|
|
(759,668 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,810,991 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension contribution |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(54,233 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(54,233 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
22,188 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
28,801 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
56,027 |
|
Other changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(18,868 |
) |
|
|
(3,086 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(182,920 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(204,874 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(3,473 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,137 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,276 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(17,305 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(11,877 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(25,671 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
43,679 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
58,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
(85,936 |
) |
|
|
125,206 |
|
|
|
(19,495 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1,394,620 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,414,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New construction |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(619,778 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(135,189 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(754,967 |
) |
Other capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(7,464 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(416,023 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(423,657 |
) |
Major maintenance expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,834 |
) |
|
|
(1,337 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(101,248 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(108,419 |
) |
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,334 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
51,594 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,260 |
|
Repayments of notes from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
708,626 |
|
|
|
(708,626 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,474,300 |
) |
|
|
1,474,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
(127,747 |
) |
|
|
(727,747 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
855,494 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Proceeds from sale of business unit |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(127,747 |
) |
|
|
(1,359,863 |
) |
|
|
(8,801 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,348,630 |
) |
|
|
1,621,168 |
|
|
|
(1,223,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt borrowing |
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
685,000 |
|
Short-term debt payment |
|
|
(685,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(685,000 |
) |
Borrowings on bank credit facilities |
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
Payments on bank credit facilities |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(85,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(120,000 |
) |
Payments of other long-term debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(9,630 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(9,630 |
) |
Advances (to)/from affiliates |
|
|
200,991 |
|
|
|
530,500 |
|
|
|
(56,631 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(674,882 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
789,300 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,474,300 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Repayments of notes to affiliates |
|
|
(685,000 |
) |
|
|
(23,626 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
708,626 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Capital contributions from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
127,747 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
727,747 |
|
|
|
(855,494 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net proceeds from employee stock transactions |
|
|
38,995 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38,995 |
|
Tax benefit of employee stock transactions |
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(195,797 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(195,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
223,769 |
|
|
|
1,234,621 |
|
|
|
28,369 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
43,235 |
|
|
|
(1,621,168 |
) |
|
|
(91,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
10,086 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
89,225 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
99,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
59,216 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
12,544 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
148,441 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
161,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
NOBLE CORPORATION AND OTHER SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2006
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHC and NDH |
|
|
Noble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noble |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
NHIL |
|
|
of Noble |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
|
$ |
731,603 |
|
|
$ |
363,918 |
|
|
$ |
404,808 |
|
|
$ |
784,022 |
|
|
$ |
(2,284,351 |
) |
|
$ |
731,866 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
223,060 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
253,325 |
|
Impairment loss on assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,849 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,849 |
|
Hurricane losses and recoveries, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(10,704 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
21,560 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,560 |
|
Equity earnings in affiliates |
|
|
(791,824 |
) |
|
|
(724,042 |
) |
|
|
(363,664 |
) |
|
|
(404,821 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,284,351 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Pension contribution |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(19,928 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(19,928 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
17,697 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,406 |
|
Other changes in current assets and liabilities, net of
acquired working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(133,109 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(131,014 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(12,586 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13,688 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,305 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,837 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
53,746 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
68,392 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
70,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
(14,898 |
) |
|
|
40,268 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
957,843 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
988,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New construction |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(477,205 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(193,746 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(670,951 |
) |
Other capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,034 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(378,059 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(382,093 |
) |
Major maintenance expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69,017 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69,017 |
) |
Accrued capital expenditures |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,334 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,766 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
Repayments from affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,562 |
|
|
|
(21,562 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27,896 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
52,104 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
Proceeds from Smedvig disposition |
|
|
691,261 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
691,261 |
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable
securities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,036 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27,966 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
46,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
656,261 |
|
|
|
(452,835 |
) |
|
|
23,862 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(607,740 |
) |
|
|
30,542 |
|
|
|
(349,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on bank credit facilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(135,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(135,000 |
) |
Payments of other long-term debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(600,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,970 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(608,970 |
) |
Accounts receivable from affiliates |
|
|
(714,996 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(47,541 |
) |
|
|
762,537 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Accounts payable to affiliates |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
431,046 |
|
|
|
670,623 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(339,145 |
) |
|
|
(762,537 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Note payable to affiliate |
|
|
17,104 |
|
|
|
(21,562 |
) |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(30,542 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Net proceeds from employee stock transactions |
|
|
21,186 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,186 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of debt
issuance costs |
|
|
295,801 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
295,801 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(21,825 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(21,825 |
) |
Repurchases of ordinary shares |
|
|
(250,132 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(250,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
(652,862 |
) |
|
|
409,484 |
|
|
|
(29,377 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(395,656 |
) |
|
|
(30,542 |
) |
|
|
(698,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(11,499 |
) |
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(45,553 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(60,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
13,957 |
|
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
104,769 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
121,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
59,216 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
61,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE. |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, David W. Williams, and
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller, Thomas L. Mitchell, have
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report. On the basis of this evaluation, Mr. Williams and Mr. Mitchell have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2008. Our disclosure controls
and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file with or submit to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated
to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended December 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring
(including internal auditing practices), and actions taken to correct deficiencies as identified.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
however well designed, including the possibility of human error and the possible circumvention or
overriding of controls. The design of an internal control system is also based in part upon
assumptions and judgments made by management about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that an internal control will be effective under all potential future conditions.
As a result, even an effective system of internal controls can provide no more than reasonable
assurance with respect to the fair presentation of financial statements and the processes under
which they were prepared.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on management’s assessment, we maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has audited the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 as stated in their report, which
is provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
93
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The sections entitled “Election of Directors”, “Additional Information Regarding the Board of
Directors”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, and “Other Matters”
appearing in the proxy statement for the annual general meeting of members (or, if the Transaction
is completed, for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders of Noble-Switzerland, as our successor)
(the “2009 Proxy Statement”), will set forth certain information with respect to directors, certain
corporate governance matters and reporting under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and are incorporated in this report by reference.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information as of February 15, 2008 with respect to our
executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Williams |
|
|
51 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julie J. Robertson |
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Mitchell |
|
|
48 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Turcotte |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
David W. Williams was named Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
effective January 2, 2008. Mr. Williams served as Senior Vice President — Business Development of
Noble Drilling Services Inc. from September 2006 to January 2007, as Senior Vice President -
Operations of Noble Drilling Services Inc. from January to April 2007, and as Senior Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of Noble from April 2007 to January 2, 2008. Prior to September 2006,
Mr. Williams served for more than five years as Executive Vice President of Diamond Offshore
Drilling, Inc., an offshore oil and gas drilling contractor.
Julie J. Robertson was named Executive Vice President effective February 10, 2006. Ms.
Robertson served as Senior Vice President — Administration from July 2001 to February 10, 2006.
Ms. Robertson has served continuously as Corporate Secretary since December 1993. Ms. Robertson
served as Vice President — Administration of Noble Drilling from 1996 to July 2001. In 1994, Ms.
Robertson became Vice President — Administration of Noble Drilling Services Inc. From 1989 to
1994, Ms. Robertson served consecutively as Manager of Benefits and Director of Human Resources for
Noble Drilling Services Inc. Prior to 1989, Ms. Robertson served consecutively in the positions of
Risk and Benefits Manager and Marketing Services Coordinator for a predecessor subsidiary of Noble,
beginning in 1979.
Thomas L. Mitchell was named Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Controller effective November 6, 2006. Prior to joining Noble, Mr. Mitchell served as Vice
President and Controller of Apache Corporation, an oil and gas exploration and production company,
since 1997. From 1996 to 1997, he served as Controller of Apache, and from 1989 to 1996 he served
Apache in various positions including Assistant to Vice President Production and Director Natural
Gas Marketing. Prior to joining Apache, Mr. Mitchell spent seven
years with Arthur Andersen & Co. where he practiced as a
Certified Public Accountant, managing clients in the oil and gas,
banking, manufacturing and government contracting industries.
William E. Turcotte was named Senior Vice President and General Counsel effective December 16,
2008. Prior to joining Noble, Mr. Turcotte served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary of Cornell Companies, Inc., a private corrections company, since March 2007.
He served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Transocean, Inc.,
an offshore oil and gas drilling contractor, from October 2005 to March 2007 and as Associate
General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from January 2000 to October 2005. From 1992 to 2000, Mr.
Turcotte served in various legal positions with Schlumberger Limited in Houston, Caracas and Paris.
Mr. Turcotte was in private practice prior to joining Schlumberger.
94
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to directors, officers and
employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at
http://www.noblecorp.com in the “Governance” area. Changes to and waivers granted with respect to
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics related to the officers identified above, and our other
executive officers and directors, that we are required to disclose pursuant to applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC will also be posted on our website.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The sections entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” appearing
in the 2009 Proxy Statement set forth certain information with respect to the compensation of our
management and our compensation committee report, and are incorporated in this report by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS. |
The sections entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information”, “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Management” appearing in the 2009 Proxy Statement set
forth certain information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity
compensation plans and the ownership of our voting securities and equity securities, and are
incorporated in this report by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE. |
The sections entitled “Additional Information Regarding the Board of Directors — Board
Independence” and “Policies and Procedures Relating to Transactions with Related Persons” appearing
in the 2009 Proxy Statement set forth certain information with respect to director independence and
transactions with related persons, and are incorporated in this report by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
The section entitled “Auditors” appearing in the 2009 Proxy Statement sets forth certain
information with respect to accounting fees and services, and is incorporated in this report by
reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
(1) |
|
A list of the financial statements filed as a part of this report is set forth
in Item 8 on page 40 and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
|
All schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or required information
is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits: |
|
|
|
|
The information required by this Item 15(a)(3) is set forth in the Index to Exhibits
accompanying this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. |
95
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOBLE CORPORATION
|
|
Date: February 27, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ DAVID W. WILLIAMS
|
|
|
|
David W. Williams, Chairman of the Board, |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity In Which Signed |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID W. WILLIAMS
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Williams
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELL
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Mitchell
|
|
Officer, Treasurer and
Controller
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL A. CAWLEY
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Cawley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ LAWRENCE J. CHAZEN
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence J. Chazen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ LUKE R. CORBETT
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Luke R. Corbett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JULIE H. EDWARDS
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Julie H. Edwards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARC E. LELAND
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marc E. Leland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JACK E. LITTLE
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack E. Little |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARY P. RICCIARDELLO
|
|
Director
|
|
February 27, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mary P. Ricciardello |
|
|
|
|
96
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 11, 2002 among Noble Corporation (the
“Registrant”), Noble Cayman Acquisition Corporation, Noble Holding (U.S.) Corporation and
Noble Drilling Corporation (included as Annex A to the proxy statement/prospectus that
constitutes a part of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-84278) and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, Reorganization and Consolidation, dated as of December 19,
2008, among Noble Corporation, Noble Corporation and Noble Cayman Acquisition Ltd. (filed as
Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Memorandum of Association of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-84278) and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Articles of Association of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 1, 1999, between Noble Drilling Corporation and JP Morgan Chase
Bank, National Association (formerly Chase Bank of Texas, National Association), as trustee
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Noble Drilling Corporation filed on March 23, 1999
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 16, 1999, between Noble Drilling Corporation and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, National Association (formerly Chase Bank of Texas, National Association),
as trustee, relating to 6.95% senior notes due 2009 and 7.50% senior notes due 2019 of Noble
Drilling Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Noble Drilling Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on
March 23, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2002, between Noble Drilling
Corporation, Noble Holding (U.S.) Corporation and Noble Corporation, and JP Morgan Chase Bank,
National Association, as trustee, relating to 6.95% senior notes due 2009 and 7.50% senior
notes due 2019 of Noble Drilling Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2005, between Noble Drilling
Corporation, Noble Drilling Holding LLC, Noble Holding (U.S.) Corporation and Noble
Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to 6.95%
senior notes due 2009 and 7.50% senior notes due 2019 of Noble Drilling Corporation (filed as
Exhibit 4.14 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-131885) and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2006, between Noble Corporation, as Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2006, between Noble Corporation, as Issuer,
Noble Drilling Corporation, as Guarantor, and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
trustee, relating to 5.875% senior notes due 2013 of Noble Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.2
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2006 and incorporated herein
by reference). |
97
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
Specimen Note for the 5.875% senior notes due 2013 of Noble Corporation (filed as Exhibit 4.3
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2006 and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2007, among Noble Corporation; the Lenders
from time to time parties thereto; Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender
and an Issuing Bank; SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent; The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ,
Ltd., Houston Agency, Fortis Capital Corp., and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation
Agents; and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, a division of
SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as Co-Lead Arrangers and Co-Book Running Managers (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2008, between Noble Holding International Limited, as
Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1
to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 21, 2008, among Noble Holding
International Limited, as Issuer, Noble Corporation, as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to 7.375% senior notes due 2014 of Noble
Holding International Limited (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
Specimen Note for the 7.375% senior notes due 2014 of Noble Holding International Limited
(filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
Form of Limited Consent (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 21, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
* |
|
Noble Drilling Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to Noble Drilling Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-17407)
dated December 6, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Amendment, effective as of May 1, 2002, to the Noble Drilling Corporation Equity
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-17407) and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
dated February 4, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Noble
Drilling Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated January 18, 2001 (No.
333-53912) and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-53912) and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan dated
February 25, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan dated
March 9, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
98
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Noble Drilling Corporation 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan dated
March 30, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
* |
|
Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan dated April 27, 1995 (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Noble Drilling Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month
period ended March 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan dated January
29, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Noble Drilling Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
* |
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan dated June 28,
2004, effective as of July 1, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
* |
|
Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Share
Plan for Non-Employee Directors dated February 4, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
* |
|
Second Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Share Plan
for Non-Employee Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three-month period ended September 25, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Noble Corporation
1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Performance-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble
Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Time-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Corporation
1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Restricted Share Agreement under the Amended and Restated Noble
Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May
4, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Performance-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble
Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Time-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Corporation
1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
* |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2002, by and between Noble
Drilling Corporation and Julie J. Robertson (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
99
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
* |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2006, by and between Noble Drilling
Corporation and Thomas L. Mitchell (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrant’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
* |
|
Transition Consulting Services Agreement dated as of April 26, 2007 between Noble
Corporation and James C. Day (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed on May 1, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
* |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2006, by and between Noble Drilling Services
Inc. and David W. Williams (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
* |
|
Noble Corporation 2008 Short Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
* |
|
Separation
Agreement and Release between Noble Corporation and Robert D. Campbell, dated May 13, 2008
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2008
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
* |
|
Composite copy of the Noble Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan dated
December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
* |
|
Amendment to the Noble Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan dated as of
December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
* |
|
Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Noble Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and
Share Plan for Non-Employee Directors dated December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
* |
|
Amendment to the Noble Corporation Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors dated December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
* |
|
Amendment to the Noble Corporation 2008 Short Term Incentive Plan dated December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
* |
|
Noble Drilling Corporation 2009 401(k) Savings Restoration Plan effective January 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
* |
|
Noble
Drilling Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan dated
December 29, 2008, effective January 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
* |
|
Noble Corporation Summary of Directors’ Compensation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Performance-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble
Corporation 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Time-Vested Restricted Stock Agreement under the Noble Corporation
1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Noble Corporation
1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
* |
|
Form of Noble Corporation Restricted Stock Agreement under the Amended and Restated Noble
Corporation 1992 Nonqualified Stock Option and Share Plan for Non-Employee
Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
* |
|
Employment agreement by and between Noble Drilling Services, Inc. and David W. Williams
dated December 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
* |
|
Employment agreement by and between Noble Drilling Services, Inc. and Thomas L. Mitchell
dated December 30, 2008. |
100
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
* |
|
Employment agreement by and between Noble Drilling Services, Inc. and Julie J. Robertson
dated December 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
Noble Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of David W. Williams pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Thomas L. Mitchell pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
+ |
|
Certification of David W. Williams pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
+ |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Mitchell pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
|
+ |
|
Furnished in accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K. |
101